Aromasin is the BEST

[CanadianBro]

There can be NO DEBATE!

Aromasin is the king of all anti-e's!

After using 2mg/day of Arimidex during a 1000mg/week
Test cycle and STILL getting quite a bit of water weight as well as slight gyno, I decided to try Aromasin.

Well, needless to say, after shooting 1gram + of test per week and taking ONE 25mg Aromasin per day, I literally had ZERO water bloat and gyno........ZERO!!!

Aromasin is simply INCREDILE

I think the reason Arimidex is much more popular is because it is much readily available as there are SEVERAL generic and undergorund versions.

However, it one has access to real Aromasin (Pharmacia), then there should be no choice between the two.

I'm sure those that have used BOTH will concur.

 

[Texas Ranger]

I heard the same thing from a brother from the AE board who swears by it. He used Nolvadex and Arimidex prior and he says it's not even close. If you're using Test at 400-750mgs a week, I don't think it's needed.

 

[CanadianBro]

If you're using Test at 400-750mgs a week, I don't think it's needed.

That may be true however, if you have access to Aromasin and want to never have to worry about bloating and gyno, then it should be the way to go.

Now I know why DrJMW speaks so highly of Exemestane.
It truly is awesome!

 

[GENETIC_FREAK]

Liquid-Exemestane is available through P&P.....It will be on the site after xmas-------------Freak

 

[galaxy]

Fuck anti e's. I need to get to 260lbs. Aint going to happen with no water, but I think you should take it Freak and tell me your results.........I see the future............you LOSE!.............galaxy

 

[GENETIC_FREAK]

Makes you wonder..........Aromasin perhaps lowers Shbg freeing up test. Keep in mind Galaxy.....Ill be 260 and still pretty Freak

 

[WARBIRDWS6]

Makes you wonder..........Aromasin perhaps lowers Shbg freeing up test. Keep in mind Galaxy.....Ill be 260 and still pretty Freak

yeah, tell that bald ugly fucker. so is this going to be good shit or what? aromasin generic makes me a bitty sketchy.

 

[galaxy]

Hey! I got all my hair bro. I just chose to shave it And to think, I was trying to give you karma, but said I needed to spread it around.LOL...........galaxy

 

[GENETIC_FREAK]

It will be on the site for sale as soon as the lab analysis on the Exemestane is completed using a US. rx Aromasin as a standard. Freak

 

[galaxy]

And Freak, dont even get me going about how much better looking I am than you!

 

[WARBIRDWS6]

It will be on the site for sale as soon as the lab analysis on the Exemestane is completed using a US. rx Aromasin as a standard. Freak

cool. i'll order some for post cycle...wanted to use it post cycle with clomid and a few other things. using arimidex 1/2 tab and 25mg proviron with the dbol half of the cycle (sust/EQ), and proviron 50mg with the last 5 wks of sust/eq/fina. yes i am gyno prone and am trying to get rid of some pre existing...reason for heavy anti-E's. i'm from stoneham/malden/lynn/revere MASS myself originally BTW.

 

[CanadianBro]

It will be on the site for sale as soon as the lab analysis on the Exemestane is completed using a US. rx Aromasin as a standard. Freak

This will be very interesting as the raw materials are very expensive. I'd love to see the price they will offer their generic version at as well as the actual quality of the product.

We shall see.......

 

[macrophage69alpha]

femara is stronger than aromasin. whether that is good or bad?? but it is stronger.

 

[galaxy]

My undrstanding is the aromasin has no effects on lipid profile , where as femera and liquidex do?.............galaxy

 

[DaMan]

femara is stronger than aromasin. whether that is good or bad?? but it is stronger.

stronger in what way? aromatase inhibition or lipid effects? (i know the answer to the second one )

 

[Zyglamail]

Argueing lip profiles of anti-es is kind of like argueing politics. I can show at least one abstract for each anti-e showing it does raise lipds and yet another showing it doesnt. Dont ya just love modern science

 

[DaMan]

Argueing lip profiles of anti-es is kind of like argueing politics. I can show at least one abstract for each anti-e showing it does raise lipds and yet another showing it doesnt. Dont ya just love modern science

And hence the miracle of bloodwork. I know that for ME, arimidex raises it significantly. Testing femara next cycle.

 

[CanadianBro]

femara is stronger than aromasin. whether that is good or bad?? but it is stronger.

If you mean stonger as an Anti-E/Anti Aromatase, I will have to disagree.

Keep in mind though, that Anastrazole and Letrozole are non-steroidal anti-aromatase agents while Exemestane is steroidal.

Also, there has not been that much extensive testing and clinical trials done on exemestane. Not nearly as many as Anastrazole and Letrozole.

 

[icelandic]

To come out and declare aromasin to be absolutely supperior to all other anti-e's is akin to declaring one single steroid to be the king of em all. (and keep you mouths shut, all you fina nuts )

I mean come one, the fact remains that aromasin is AT LEAST twice as expensive as any comparable aromatase inhibitor, unless your one of the lucky few whose insurance will cover AAS and/or ancillaries, but you guys don't really count either

Its like the basic economic principle of cost/benefit analysis. Not every aas user out there needs hardcore estrogen suppresion, genetics play a HUGE role in one's susceptibilty to estrogenic sides. I know people who can get away with 50mgs of proviron while taking up to a gram per week. Would it really be worth it for someone like that to throw down three or four beans a day just for stopping trace amounts of e when they can get away with spending pennies a day for nearly the same results. Those savings can then be spent on food and/or supps in order to grow.

 

[CanadianBro]

To come out and declare aromasin to be absolutely supperior to all other anti-e's is akin to declaring one single steroid to be the king of em all. (and keep you mouths shut, all you fina nuts )

I mean come one, the fact remains that aromasin is AT LEAST twice as expensive as any comparable aromatase inhibitor, unless your one of the lucky few whose insurance will cover AAS and/or ancillaries, but you guys don't really count either

Its like the basic economic principle of cost/benefit analysis. Not every aas user out there needs hardcore estrogen suppresion, genetics play a HUGE role in one's susceptibilty to estrogenic sides. I know people who can get away with 50mgs of proviron while taking up to a gram per week. Would it really be worth it for someone like that to throw down three or four beans a day just for stopping trace amounts of e when they can get away with spending pennies a day for nearly the same results. Those savings can then be spent on food and/or supps in order to grow.

I disagree.

With steroids, there are many goals one could have. It could be a bulking cycle, it could be a cutting cycle.

However, with an anti-e/anti-aromatas, the goal is to do everything possible to prevent estrogen conversion and ideally keep water bloat and gyno to a minimun correct?

Of course it is!

So with that one goal in mind, we actually CAN say that one or the other is the BEST because the goal is the same for each.

With my personal experience using all 3 of the Aromatase Inhibitors with fairly heavy Test Stacks, I without a doubt say that Aromasin did the best job.

Also, I have no less that half a dozen friends that also have used all 3 of the major Inhibitors and feel the same way.

You see, I am speaking from years of experience. Therefore, I think I can say that Aromasin is the best.

I appreciate your feedback and respect your opinion.

 

[icelandic]

I understand exactly where your coming from, for me personally I have no doubt that aromasin would work extremely well. But the argument I'm making here is that there are some lucky bros out there who need very little as far as estrogen suppresion is concerned. For them to shell out the big bucks for aromasin when a much cheaper alternative will end with nearly the same result seems to contradict any "one is best" mantra regardless of which drug were talking about.

 

[CanadianBro]

I understand exactly where your coming from, for me personally I have no doubt that aromasin would work extremely well. But the argument I'm making here is that there are some lucky bros out there who need very little as far as estrogen suppresion is concerned. For them to shell out the big bucks for aromasin when a much cheaper alternative will end with nearly the same result seems to contradict any "one is best" mantra regardless of which drug were talking about.

Yes, as far as price vs Cycle is concerned, I would DEFINITELY NOT recommend Aromasin for a 250mg/week Sustanon only cycle.

You are right on with that statement.

 

[Sigmund Roid]

Whatever happened to the enthousiasm of formestan, a suicidal aromatase inhibitor. You can inject it in the same syringe as your aromatising gear.

 

[baby_bbol]

Yes, as far as price vs Cycle is concerned, I would DEFINITELY NOT recommend Aromasin for a 250mg/week Sustanon only cycle.

You are right on with that statement.

Is the some type of standard like with arimidex/liquidex: .25mg of armidex/250mg of test?

How much test can you run per week with 25mg/EOD of aromasin to prevent water bloat and gyno?

 

[chakarov]

$3.5 per day. Wow that's going to break the bank! Even if you went hardcore and ran a highly androgenic cycle it would cost you $157.5 for 45 days. That's dirt cheap for insurance provided by an ancillary. To say Aromasin is very expensive is ignorant; you just done't know the right peopls...

 

[tbro]

femara is stronger than aromasin. whether that is good or bad?? but it is stronger.

MACRO PLEASE EXPLAIN!!!!

 

[Nutzz]

i'm from stoneham/malden/lynn/revere MASS myself originally BTW.

You would actually admit to being from lynn and revere?!?!?!

 

[JP@Ironology]

Good feedback so far.

 

[macrophage69alpha]

femara is stronger than aromasin. whether that is good or bad?? but it is stronger.

MACRO PLEASE EXPLAIN!!!!

it cuts estrogen to a point that may be TOO low in some people. it is quite effective.

it has been put forth that it MIGHT also impact some synthesis of other steroids precursors and that aromosin does not... though have not seen the data to back that up. and not sure that it is a sound theory, but it is one that may have some credence.

 

[hardrock]

Well now, I'm sure glad I read this post. Just started my cycle today. I'm running;

1-10 750 mg sus
1-6 50 mg dbol/day
7-12 75 mg fina/day

was planning on running .25 liquidex/day all the way through.

Now keep in mind my last was

1-10 600 mg Eq
1-10 800 mg test enan
1-6 60 mg dbol/day
7-13 fina 75 mg/day

ran liquidex all the way through@ .5 mg per day and had very little bloat(if any) and no gyno.

I keep hearin ya need a little estrogen, and I'm thinkin I could've used less Liquidex.

Any advantages to using Aromasin instead? Thoughts?

 

[BigAndy69]

What's so bad about a little bloat?