Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Anyone out there who is PROUD to have the 2nd Amendment?

The 2nd Amendment, like any other amendment, is subject to regulation. Thus, legislators have every right to restrict the 2nd Amendment to advance the health, safey, and welfare of our society.

Prepare to see more regulations on the purchase and sell of guns. It's going to take more than the NRA (killing machine) to give everyone an absolute, unqualified, ubiquitous right to own a gun.
 
Sure ryan, the NRA goes out and shoots people...yep, they're a killing machine.

Dazzling logic indeed! Care to explain with facts and quotes?
 
huntmaster said:
Check my avatar bro--- I am a proud member of the NRA.

Hitler's first priority was to disarm the public. He knew that if he could do this they could not resist or protect.
The only way to live is to have a nice cold piece of steel strapped to your hip. Down here in South Florida we can carry if we have the license (which I do) but it must be conceiled, I feel that if people see you carring then they will think twice before trying to do something to you. And don't forget, if you ever have to use your gun make sure you shoot to kill, this way the bastard wont bother anyone again, Justice served without the cost of a trial
 
The NRA spends more money and does more to educate children about gun safety than all crybaby liberals world wide.

They dont cry about the problems and try to find a easy and false solution----they take the effort to develop programs like Eddy The Eagle to educate children and preserve rights.

Ryan---lets talk facts and not resort to throwing around false labels.
 
ryan, calling the nra a killing machine is more ludicrous liberal propaganda. there are enough gun laws out there, we need to enforce the ones we got now make new ones that will fail. hunt is right, the nra does more to educate peopel on gun safety and care than you can imagine.
 
Code said:
Sure ryan, the NRA goes out and shoots people...yep, they're a killing machine.

that's right, they are indeed a legalized killing machine. For years now, the NRA has fought any type of legislation, tooth and nail, that would remove guns from the hands of murderers, but instead have consistently chosen to uphold some "supposed" right for almost anyone to own a gun. Moreover, the NRA has consistently upheld the selling of guns that can be used for no other purpose than for mass killings. Thus, they aid and abet murderers. Hence, they are just as culpable.
 
> Things that the news will never tell you
January 25, 2002 -- ANOTHER school shooting occurred last week and the
> >headlines were everywhere the same, from Australia to Nigeria. This time
> the
> >shooting occurred at a university, the Appalachian Law School. As usual,
> >there were calls for more gun control.
> >
> >Yet in this age of "gun-free school zones," one fact was missing from
> >virtually all the news coverage: The attack was stopped by two students
who
> >had guns in their cars.
> >
> >The fast responses of two male students, Mikael Gross, 34, and Tracy
> >Bridges, 25, undoubtedly saved multiple lives.
> >
> >Mikael was outside the law school and just returning from lunch when
Peter
> >Odighizuwa started his attack. Tracy was in a classroom waiting for class
> to
> >start.
> >
> >When the shots rang out, utter chaos erupted. Mikael said, "People were
> >running everywhere. They were jumping behind cars, running out in front
of
> >traffic, trying to get away."
> >
> >Mikael and Tracy did something quite different: Both immediately ran to
> >their cars and got their guns. Mikael had to run about 100 yards to get
to
> >his car. Along with Ted Besen (who was unarmed), they approached Peter
from
> >different sides.
> >
> >As Tracy explained it, "I aimed my gun at him, and Peter tossed his gun
> >down. Ted approached Peter, and Peter hit Ted in the jaw. Ted pushed him
> >back and we all jumped on."
> >
> >What is so remarkable is that out of 280 separate news stories (from a
> >computerized Nexis-Lexis search) in the week after the event, just four
> >stories mentioned that the students who stopped the attack had guns.
> >
> >Only two local newspapers (the Richmond Times-Dispatch and the Charlotte
> >Observer) mentioned that the students actually pointed their guns at the
> >attacker.
> >
> >Much more typical was the scenario described by the Washington Post,
where
> >the heroes had simply "helped subdue" the killer. The New York Times
noted
> >only that the attacker was "tackled by fellow students."
> >
> >Most in the media who discussed how the attack was stopped said:
"students
> >overpowered a gunman," "students ended the rampage by tackling him," "the
> >gunman was tackled by four male students before being arrested," or
> >"Students ended the rampage by confronting and then tackling the gunman,
> who
> >dropped his weapon."
> >
> >In all, 72, stories described how the attacker was stopped without
> >mentioning that the student heroes had guns.
> >
> >Unfortunately, the coverage in this case was not unusual. In the other
> >public school shootings where citizens with guns have stopped attacks,
> >rarely do more than one percent of the news stories mention that citizens
> >with guns stopped the attacks.
> >
> >Many people find it hard to believe that research shows that there are 2
> >million defensive gun uses each year. After all, if these events were
> really
> >happening, wouldn't we hear about them on the news? But when was the last
> >time you saw a story on the national evening news (or even the local
news)
> >about a citizen using his gun to stop a crime?
> >
> >This misreporting actually endangers people's lives. By selectively
> >reporting the news and turning a defensive gun use story into one where
> >students merely "overpowered a gunman" the media gives misleading
> >impressions of what works when people are confronted by violence.
> >
> >Research consistently shows that having a gun is the safest way to
respond
> >to any type of criminal attack, especially these multiple victim
shootings.
> >
> >John Lott is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and
> the
> >author of "More Guns, Less Crime."
>
>
 
Sushi X said:
ryan, calling the nra a killing machine is more ludicrous liberal propaganda. there are enough gun laws out there, we need to enforce the ones we got now make new ones that will fail. hunt is right, the nra does more to educate peopel on gun safety and care than you can imagine.

I see you've adopted that familiar Republican refrain of "Oh the laws are on the books, we just need to enforce them." The problem with this absurd refrain is that most of the current laws are ineffective, contain numerous loopholes, and stop far short of what is needed to solve the existing crisis in our nation.
 
Man, I was sure you'd be bright enough to at least give a valid response not based on rhetoric.

Has pulling the party line so long given you a back ache yet?
 
Top Bottom