Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply puritysourcelabs US-PHARMACIES
UGL OZ Raptor Labs UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAKUS-PHARMACIESRaptor Labs

anyone done a paper on steroids?

sconoscuito

Banned
I need a 10+ page essay on steroids

or at least an outline for now

i still got lots of time for this but figured you guys might help me out with the outline
 
yeah, i worked like 2 times faster, but it felt like i was working at th esame speed...

i got an A, but a week later i got gyno:(
 
writing a paper for school on steroids is like broadcasting your last cycle over the loudspeaker. hope you arent planning on keeping your gear use secret...
 
at my college you can't do papers on weed or steroids because they have already been done too many 89796879867 times.

do something easy w/ lots of info - like euthanasia/assisted-suicided or something like that.
 
12 pages, i didnt write it




The Media Has Put a Bad Name on Anabolic Steroids




The media tells us all the time about how bad anabolic and androgenic steroids (AAS) are for the human body. The question is, can we really trust what they are telling us? Numerous clinical and scientific studies have been done, and every time the health hazards come back they are very minimal. Very interesting, is it not? We need to ask ourselves, why are there so many false beliefs about these performance enhancing drugs? Why does the public eye look down on anabolic and androgenic steroid users? It all boils down to the media! The media has told us how steroids are not good for the human body, and have almost told us what to think about them. They have fed the public numerous untruths about steroids and have not shown us actual clinical and scientific research that backs up their statements. Have they shown us examples or references so that we, the people, can do our own research and make up our own minds about how we feel about the use of steroids? Clearly, the media has placed a false belief about anabolic and androgenic steroids in our minds without even giving proof that what they are saying is true.
Anabolic (tissue structure) and androgenic (masculinizing) are the qualities that testosterone possess. Primary muscle growth comes from the anabolic effects. Deepening of the voice, facial and body hair, are the androgenic effects of secondary male sex characteristics. Cosmetic appearance and sports performance come from the beneficial effects of anabolic steroids. John Ziegler, M.D., who in correspondence with the pharmaceutical supplier CIBA; introduced to bodybuilders the oral steroid Dianabol in 1956. Scientists had constructed many unique anabolic/androgenic steroids and thousands of athletes were taking them during the mid 1960’s (Collins).
By the turn of the century, scientists were able to produce the first experimental androgen injection. A lot of time was spent researching steroids and steroid production. The androgens were actualized through filtering urine or by extracting testosterone from animal testicles. Much time went on, and research continued with not very much to show but the idea and the theory that testosterone could be added to a test subject and it would grow faster. In the mid 1930’s, chemists finally, after the idea more than 130 years ago, synthesized the structure of testosterone. This was a breakthrough development in the scientific world of anabolic (Zulak).
Germans first experimented on their own dogs and then on soldiers during World War 2 to help them stay healthy and combat malnutrition while fighting in the war. This was the first time steroids were used in the medical field. As you read, they were used to keep their soldiers healthy while fighting. Steroids did keep them healthy too. It would be harder for something like malnutrition to set in on a soldier that was on an anabolic steroid because he is working out in the field. When the muscles are working, and that person has more testosterone in his body, the muscles have no choice but to grow. Testosterone is what makes muscles grow more rapidly. More testosterone yields more muscle if they are working and doing strenuous activities like soldiers do. Athletes in the 1950’s found that steroids were beneficial to them meeting the personal goals that they set for themselves (Zulak).
The world of medicine has taken advantage of the discovery of anabolic steroids. Oxymetholone, also known as Androl 50, is known to treat cases of anemia and it also increases red blood cell production. It is an oral androgen that is one of the strongest, steroid available. The medical field has found many beneficial uses for steroids. So why does the media put such a bad reputation on steroids if doctors are still prescribing them, and they are benefiting the users? This is a very important question that should be asked. Androl also has exceptional anti-wasting properties in HIV Positive and AIDS patients (Zulak).
The benefits versus the health hazards analogous with anabolic steroid use are what society today is largely misinformed about. As in all drugs, steroids have side effects. Extravagant horror stories about undeviating side effects and even death are not evident by the true nature of AAS. Professional bodybuilders taking enormous doses of many different drugs in addition to diuretics are the persons that have been hospitalized or have died from steroid related causes. Athletes in amateur, collegiate, Olympic, and professional have all reached the primary levels of their sports with steroids. Elite military commandos, martial artist, and police officers (ironically), have also become bigger, faster, and stronger by way of steroid use (Anabolik).
AAS are not remotely as hazardous to your body as you might have believed. Taking too much of anything is bad for you, look at frequent aspirin users. Of the people that have died in all the wars fought in the twentieth century combined, more people will die this year from the effects of alcohol and tobacco use. The Propaganda that the media gives out regarding AAS has brainwashed most of the public. They simply don’t have a clue. Society has no idea on how prevalent AAS use is. Most of the general populace does not understand why athletes are so exceedingly bigger, faster, and stronger than just a few decades ago. Natural adaptation does not work that instantaneously. Humans use AAS because they work in today‘s world. Until something better comes along, steroid use is here to remain (Anabolik).
In the early 1990’s, U.S. legislators who voted to control AAS were so oblivious about these drugs that they initially misspelled the legislation to control “antibiotic steroids.” AAS have been legislated into a controlled substance equal to heroin, cocaine, and LSD. How can the U.S. Government compare AAS to addictive, harmful drugs? In the early 1990’s, the United States Government made alcohol illegal for fourteen years. This did very little to stop the consumption of intoxicating drinks. The Government achieved in equipping organized crime with the multi-billion dollar black-market enterprises of supplying alcohol. Moreover, strong laws on AAS have created an underground industry to satisfy the traffic for AAS (Anabolik).
Orally taken A/A steroids advance through the gastrointestinal tract to the liver, then journey immediately into the blood stream. The cells within the tissues of our anatomy have receptor sites with a liking for steroid molecules in our skeletal muscle cells. An A/A Steroid molecule is carried via blood enters the muscle cell by diffusion and attaches to a receptor site. To force certain metabolic changes within the cell, a connection is designed that permits the steroid molecule to transfer a cellular command to the receptor sites. The metabolic changes that increases protein synthesis and nitrogen retention leads to enhanced size and strength of the skeletal muscle cell. Once the A/A steroid dispenses its cellular order, it moves to other receptor sites via blood flow, delivering its command until it is converted into another substance or is given off by means of waste (Collins).
Extreme exercise causes the body to generate a catabolic molecule called cortical, which causes muscle tissue failure. Anabolics, having an anticatabolic effect, prevent the collapse of muscle tissue by removing cortisol from its receptors. Thus, restoration processes are accelerated and injuries, including the microscopic muscle damage incurred from intense training, regenerate rapidly (Collins).
In certain adolescent diseases and some types of anemia, the use of AS can successfully treat them. Similar clinical uses focus on the tissue construction and anti-catabolic effects, such as in the medical care of burn victims, AIDS patients, or patients undernourished from disease or progressed age. As means of male contraception, testosterone supplementation has been extensively tested. Recent research has begun to explore the use of androgen replacement as a safe and effective anti-aging therapy for middle-aged men, as endogenous testosterone production decreases with age (Collins).
By two-dimensional echocardiography, researchers examined 4 elite endurance-trained athletes. Previously, they studied 13 bodybuilders, and examined the individual left ventricular dimensions. The 4 elite endurance-trained athletes had a left ventricular wall thickness outside 13mm. One of the 13 bodybuilders had a left ventricular wall thickness of 16mm, the largest ever reported. Considering past events, 43% of the steroid-free bodybuilders and 100% of the steroid users had a left ventricular wall thickness beyond the normal range of 11mm. Furthermore, 1 steroid-free subject and 3 steroid users were beyond the critical mark of 13mm. None of the athletes had symptoms of diastolic dysfunction. 13mm can be discovered ordinarily in elite endurance-trained athletes who do not use AAS (Haycock).
Gynecomastia is a common disease of the male breast where there is a benign glandular enlargement of that breast. It usually consists of the appearance of a flat pad of glandular tissue beneath a nipple, which becomes tender at the same time. The development may be unilateral or bilateral. There is rarely a continued growth of the breast tissue; ordinarily the process is of brief duration and stops short of the production of permanent enlargement of the breast. A great number of patients who suffer from this disease have a disturbance in the proper ratio of androgen and estrogen levels. The normal ratio of the two hormones in plasma is approximately 100:1. "The etiology of gyecomastia in patients with a known documented cause appears to be related to increased estrogen stimulation, decreased testosterone levels, or some alteration of the estrogens and androgen so that the androgen-estrogen ratio is decreased. From this information it was discovered that there is also a lower ratio of weaker adrenal androgens (delta 4-androstenedione and dehydroepiandrosterone) found in youths with this disease. It was once believed that there was an imbalance in the ratios of testosterone to estrogen or estradiol, but this is now known to be untrue (Williams).
Gynecomastia is found only in males, and the signs can appear any time in a male's lifetime. It is the leading breast disorder in males and it accounts for 60% of all disorders of the male breast. About 85% of male breast masses are due to gynecomastia. Forty percent of the cases affect pubescent boys occurring most often between the ages of 14 to 15.5. Approximately 40% of normal men and up to 70% of hospitalized men have palpable breast tissue. Active gynecomastia in autopsy data is between 5 and 9%. "More than 80% of there hospitalized patients with a body mass index of 25 kg/m2 or greater had gynocamastia."(Williams) About 70% of pubertal males required no treatment. "If the threshold for judging that the breast is enlarged is set at 2.0cm in diameter, the incidence is 32-36% in normal aged men 17-58 years." A bloody discharge is present in about 60% of patients, while a milky discharge is present in about 1% of patients (Williams).
In the case of gynecomastia the disease can occur in a newborn baby, at puberty or at any time in a man's life. In the newborn, transient enlargement of the breast is due to the action of maternal and/or placental estrogens. The enlargement usually disappears within a few weeks. Adolescent gynecomastia is common during puberty with the onset at the median age of 14. It is often asymmetrical and frequently tender. It regresses so that by the age of 20 only a small number of men have palpable vestiges of gynecomastia in one or both the breasts. Gynecomastia of aging also occurs in otherwise healthy men. Forty percent or more of aged men have gynecomastia. One explanation is the increase in age in the conversion of androgens to estrogens in extra- glandular tissues. Drug therapy and abnormal liver functioning can also be causes of gynecomastia in older men. When the disease is pathologic the patient can have increased estrogen secretions, increased conversion of androgens to estrogens or decreased androgen activity due to a failure in protein receptors. Increased estrogen secretions are found in such diseases and disorders as Hermaphroditism, Kleinfelter's syndrome, congenital adrenal hyperlasia, and adrenal carcinoma or testicular tumors. In the second case some examples are adrenal carcinoma, liver disorders, malnutrition and thyroidtoxicosis. Decreased androgen activity can be found in complete testicular feminization, incomplete testicular feminization and Reifenstein's syndrome (Williams).
Serious swimmers wear extrinsic suits that make them swim faster and longer. The truth is that nothing is dishonest with that. Fiberglass poles are used instead of the hickory shafts used 80 years ago in track and field. No one argues that vaulters go back to hickory poles on the basis that fiberglass are unnatural. The runner who set a world record in the 100-yard dash in 1928 was disallowed starting blocks instead of digging holes in the ground. Eight years later, it became illegal to dig holes in the ground. What had been an unjust advantage was now a requisite. Sometimes called unfair because they may not have been earned, advantages may still be legitimate, as in the case with genetics. Because of some advantages that cannot be compensated for are why most competitions are won. AAS don’t work like magic. Even if you take massive amounts of AAS they will never make you look like a bodybuilder unless you work out hard (Gendin). The noted health risks associated with these “deadly drugs” provided a presumably valid basis for the legislation, while the chief objective of Congress in classifying AS as controlled substances was seemingly to resolve the pharmacological “cheating” problem in competition sports (Collins).
Historically the medical and scientific community has been less than truthful in presenting information about AS to the general public. For example, for many years their position was that steroids do not build muscle. In 1984, the well-known anti-steroid text: Death in the Locker Room, then medical student Bob Goldman purposed his theory about how steroids work in a section devoted to the “placebo effect.” It is uncertain whether such faulty opinions were based upon ignorance of the staggering descriptive evidence or upon an attempt to harbor the general public by concealing the truth. “The medical community lost much credibility as a result of repeated denials that AS enhance performance.” Obviously, the athletes themselves knew years earlier about the effects of anabolics on sports achievement and appearance. While today the medical community admits that there is no question that AS do in fact work, its earlier position created a immense mistrust within the athletic establishment and led to an debate between the groups that may never be undone (Collins).
Creatine, Andro, and Protein powder do not promote largely to the anatomy of a man that weights 265 pounds at 4% body fat. Long before the laws to contain steroids, misinformation and hypocrisy existed. The real risks versus the rewards and common steroid use are what society is extremely uneducated about. Ignorance is bliss, but the truth will always stand (Anabolik).
Bodybuilders are constantly in search of substances that will increase anabolism. We take our creatine, glutamine, pyruvate, and a host of other nutritional supplements in our quest for more muscle. Bodybuilders who choose to go the "enhanced" route are always searching for the anabolic drug that will take their physique to the next level. With all of the means at our disposal to increase muscular bodyweight, one simple fact often gets overlooked. Food is the most anabolic substance we can put in our bodies (Collins).
A very popular untruth about steroids is that the testes permanently shrink. It is a fact that the testes do shrink. This is caused by the addition of outside testosterone to the body. The body realizes there is more being added, so it does not need to produce as much, causing the testes to shrink. Clomiphene citrate (Clomid) is a drug that is able to bring testosterone production back to normal levels as well as testicle size back to normal. In studies, Clomid therapy post cycle will bring natural testosterone production back to normal, also bring testicle size back to normal as well. In men, the application of Clomid causes an elevation of follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone. As a result, natural testosterone production is also increased. This effect is obviously beneficial to the athlete, especially at the conclusion of a cycle when endogenous testosterone levels are subnormal. When an athlete discontinues the use of steroids, his testosterone levels will most likely be suppressed. If endogenous testosterone levels are not brought to normal, a dramatic loss in size and strength may occur (Zulak).
People think that they should not use AAS because of birth defects to future children. Anabolic steroids can cause the sperm count to decrease, but it is not linked to birth defects. A good example is Arnold Schwarzenegger. This man is a former Mr. Universe, Mr. Olympia, and also Mr. World. He has taken numerous cycles of steroids, and now has a wife and children. His kids are not deformed in any way and are not defected (Zulak).
AAS are obviously the "bastard child" of controlled drugs. Analysis of federal and state substance schedules reveals that almost all controlled drugs are catalogues in subordinate classifications. It depicts them in terms of their instant psychoactive effects: hallucinogens, stimulants, narcotics, depressants, and opiates. How did AAS come to be classified amongst this collection of unlike drugs when they have no immediate mood-altering effects (Williams)?
Over 3 million athletes and bodybuilders in the United States have used Anabolic steroids, according to recent statistic reports. 90% of elite athletes have at one time taken some form of illegal muscle-endurance enhancing drugs, according to a recent Sports Illustrated article. New steroid legislation, steroid testing, scare tactics, and education programs have been placed to directly put an end to AAS usage. Efforts that have been made to stop the usage of AAS have been unproductive. The reality is that AAS use in the U.S. is still spreading and will continue to do so until something better comes along. Due to their powerful reaction on the body to help promote muscle mass and strength, is what make AAS vastly popular to athletes (Roid).
It is clear that steroids are the “bastard child” of controlled substances. The majority of the controlled substances are such things as marijuana, cocaine, LSD, and methamphetimines. These are all drugs that play a large role in the way the users think and act. Do steroids affect the way a human being can think and act? No, they do not. Drugs such as marijuana are socially acceptable and are readily available everywhere in the world. It seems as though doing these drugs are the cool things to do, and other people do not put them down. It also seems like the media is somewhat promoting marijuana. There are shirts and hats with marijuana leaves on them, there are also clothes made out of hemp. Stores that only sell products made out of hemp are very popular. When people find out about a person being on steroids, it is automatically wrong and they look at the person in a totally different way. What is the big deal about a person putting a drug in their body to make themselves look better and perform better? It seems as though people do not even care about others putting drugs into their bodies that will physically and mentally harm them without proper research and/or medically supervised. The media wants the biggest, fastest, and strongest athletes than that of years previous but how can that be without the aid of AAS. It seems that the media has a double-standard when it comes to being the best and the strongest.

Works Cited
Anabolic Advantage. "A brief commentary about anabolic steroids." 1999. <http://www.anabolik.com/> (Sept. 5, 2001). Anabolic Steroids. “Just the Facts." <http://www.roid.com/> (Sept. 5, 2001). Collins, Rick. Anabolic Steroids, Bodybuilding and the Law. 2000. <http://www.steroidlaw.com/> (Sept. 8, 2001). Croce, Matt, Ph.D. Bridging the Gap Between Science and Practice."'Bad' Steroids help AIDS Patients Live."2001. <http://www.thinkmuscle.com/> (Sept. 6, 2001). Gendin, Sidney, Ph.D. Bridging the Gap Between Science and Practice. "Let's Ban Those Who Don't Use Drugs."2001. <http://www.thinkmuscle.com/> (Sept. 6, 2001). Haycock, Bryan, Ph.D. Bridging the Gap Between Science and Practice. "Have Doctors Been...?" 2001. <http://www.thinkmuscle.com/> (Sept. 6, 2001). Williams, David, Ph.D. Sports In America. San Diego, LA Greenhaven Press, 1994. Zulak, Greg. "Uncensored." MuscleMag. April 2000.
 
ehh i think i can do steroids, no weed and aclohol though i dont think

steroids is kinda easy considering i got all of you who got my back

i think
 
Doing some paper right now, actually.
 
ChewYxRage said:
do something easy w/ lots of info - like euthanasia/assisted-suicided or something like that.


a237f2f82f4de429922697f88f6f8457.jpg
 
sconoscuito said:
I need a 10+ page essay on steroids

or at least an outline for now

i still got lots of time for this but figured you guys might help me out with the outline













Thick and Thin:
Bodybuilding as an Eating Disorder

By:

Guards






















Professor Sociology 4263





Every morning, you wake up to a new day. You crawl out of bed, rub your eyes and stretch, and then saunter over to the bathroom to begin your morning routine. As you enter the bathroom, you turn and look into a contraption which our society has labeled as a mirror and staring back at you is a perfect image of yourself. But what if that image changed? What if you woke up tomorrow morning, rubbed your eyes, sauntered over to the bathroom to discover someone else looking at you in the mirror, someone you didn’t even like? This is the affliction that millions of people must deal with everyday. That the person that they see in the mirror is not the person whom they wish they were. Now, take a step back and attempt to guess the gender of the person who sees themselves in such a light. What is the stereotype? Most likely, the image you have conjured up in your head is that of a wispy looking teenaged girl, battling with the stresses of becoming an adult and wanting to look like the girls that she has seen in the magazines and in the movies. What if it was suggested to you that the person looking in the mirror was not, in fact, a wispy teenaged girl but rather a two hundred and fifty pound man with giant biceps, perfectly formed abdominal muscles, and shoulders more akin to a house rather than a man. Surprised? You shouldn’t be, as this is the scenario that is being played out more and more within our media driven culture. The body dysmorphic disorders, an area that used to be reserved for women, have allowed men to join their exclusive club; introducing the Adonis Complex. The realm of eating disorders has always been dominated by women, that is, until recently. The disorders bulimia and anorexia nervosa conjure up images of starving women attempting to look like the girls they see on television or in a magazine. These images that have been present amongst our present mediums or media for decades. Wraith thin women prancing around in bikinis and stick-like women strutting their stuff down the runways are only a few of these images portrayed by our media. What is only now becoming apparent is that the man prancing around in the Speedo bathing suit with the rippling muscles and the rock hard abs situated beside the overly-thin beauty in the bikini is having a similar effect on the male population. Move over you starved ladies and make room for the men with as much distress and lack of confidence as you do. Eating disorders are no longer a female dominated affliction.

The evolution of the eating disorder begins approximately 50 years ago, when the ideal female body type began to thin out considerably. From the healthy cherub of Marilyn Monroe to the sickly thin “twiggy” and Cheryl Tieggs, the ideal body type portrayed in the media was fast becoming a broomstick-like ideal. In a culture of self-indulgence, the notion that “thin was in” was beginning to be adopted. During the nineteen sixties, psychologists began diagnosing women who had starved themselves to obtain this ultra-thin image as having anorexia nervosa, a body dysmorphic disorder that meant people viewed themselves as being too fat even if they were absolutely famished and frail. From anorexia arose the sister eating disorder of bulimia, a disorder whereby an individual binges and purges on food, evacuating the food through whatever means necessary before it could put on the weight that it was intended to put on. These disorders remained almost exclusively the plight of women. Nowhere was there any mention of men or how these particular eating disorders affected them, albeit there must have been men who suffered from these disorders. The stereotype of the times was that any man complaining of their body was feminine, a trait that was, and is still, frowned upon. So, the number of men actually treated for these disorders was, and remains, extremely negligible compared to women. In the area of men’s health a new phenomenon was forming; the gym. With men such as Charles Atlas, Lou Ferrigno, and Arnold Schwarzenegger, the notion of what was the ideal physique for a man was changing at a rapid pace. Training techniques and new advances in diet supplementation had brought about revolution in the arena of bodybuilding. The unobtainable body had become obtainable, or had it?

The advent of never before seen muscularity being achieved by a small group of individuals, namely those involved in the body building community, began very slowly and very quietly. The physiques being presented at the bodybuilding competitions were getting bigger, stronger, and at the same time leaner and more “cut”. Some may see this as a direct correlation to the mainstream availability of anabolic steroids and hormones. It may also have to do with the general phenomenon of bodybuilding as a sport becoming increasingly popular. It may also have a correlation with the changing attitudes within society as to what is healthy and how to achieve it. Regardless, it is the combination of all these things that has brought the ideal male physique to what it is today. The ideal physique for men has evolved from a very obtainable athletic figure, such as the athletes of the earlier part of this century, to an extremely difficult to obtain, large, rock hard, physical phenomenon. A physique can only be acquired through the use of extremely dedicated training, extremely rigorous diet regimens, and the use of hormones and anabolic steroids. The quest to obtain this overly muscled physique is what has brought about societal creation of the Adonis Complex.

The Adonis Complex has been compared to other eating disorders as “Bigorexia Nervosa” or “reverse anorexia” (www.addictions.net, 1997). It is the constant pursuit of a giant muscled physique; a pursuit that takes away from almost all other facets of daily life. The Adonis Complex is the collective insecurities caused by society’s cultural ideal of the male physique imposed on the individual. These insecurities may include such things as penis size, chest size, bicep size, definition and striation of the muscles, as well as the overall muscular appearance (Pope, 2001). Although the Adonis Complex itself is not a medically recognized disorder, it is made up of a number of different medical disorders. These include depression, bulimia, and most notably muscle dysmorphia. Muscle dysmorphia is characterized as the affliction of when an individual gazes in the mirror, they view themselves as being too small or too frail and that more muscle is needed to achieve the “look” they desire. Unfortunately, this look is never obtained because no matter how big or how defined a person with muscle dysmorphia becomes, they will never be content with their body (Pope, 2001). “A recent study shows that 36% of third-grade boys had tried to lose weight. In the past 10 years, more than a million males have been found to have eating disorders. In addition to suffering from anorexia and bulimia at increasing rates, boys are falling victim to a newly names disorder: muscle dysmorphia (also called bigorexia) – the conviction that one is too small” (Dickinson, 2000).

Where do these insecurities come from? There are extreme amount of diverse opinions as to where these individual insecurities are derived from. Let us start at childhood. Many people have begun to argue that dolls and children’s toys play a significant role in how we view our bodies and what we view as the ideal physique. During the early nineteen nineties, a movement was formed to change the look of the popular girls doll “Barbie” from the almost genetically impossible measurements to a more obtainable and reserved physique. Yet, toys that are being marketed towards young boys are following the trend of the giant, muscled male physique, which very few people will ever be able to obtain. According to one study, action figure toys show that the physique of the character grows ever more muscular with time, exceeding the muscularity of the biggest human bodybuilders, though Barbie’s boyfriend, Ken, has been spared that indignity (Morgan, 2000). “In 1964, G.I. Joe sported a respectable but unremarkable physique; if he were five feet, 10 inches, he would have had a 32 inch waist, a 44-inch chest, and thin 12 inch arms. By 1991, G.I. Joe’s waist had shrunk to 29 inches, and his arms had grown to 16. He had, in other words, become a bodybuilder. Star Wars action figures-Luke Skywalker and Han Solo- were ordinarily athletic in 1978, but by 1995 they were on steroids” (Rauch, 2000). Perhaps this image projected by these action figures promoted the need to be disproportionately muscular. Another source that may contribute to the growing number of men with muscle dysmorphia is the media. The media has begun to portray men in a much different light than it has in the past. Movie stars of the past often sported very obtainable, and frankly quite un-athletic, bodies. It is rare that someone would refer to John Wayne or Frank Sinatra as physical phenomenons. Now, the action and pop stars of today must be in the comparably amazing physical shape. From Arnold Schwarzenegger's giant chiseled physique to Brad Pitt’s extremely defined and sinewy abdominal muscles to Russell Crow’s bulging biceps, the stars of today are presenting the image that being in shape is the only way to be the so-called hero, that their physical prowess somehow gave them the tools to overcome evil. The hero ideal is something that most men would strive to emulate, unfortunately that became tied directly to their outside appearance. The media has taken great strides to moderate the images of women portrayed in the media. They have gone so far as to create guidelines and rules governing the images of women presented in most print-media as well as certain sectors of visual media. Yet, absolutely nothing has been done to address the portrayal of equally unrealistic male physiques. “The UK government’s recent Body Image Summit resulted in commitments from the editors of women’s magazines to ban unhealthy images of women, but the problem of male body image was unrepresented and disregarded. It is no criticism of feminism to suggest that sociocultural approaches to eating disorders must now accept that fat is not just a feminist issue” (Morgan, 2000).

Another issue that may have contributed to the rise in body dysmorphic disorders in men is the rise in popularity of physical exercise. One study suggested that more than two billion dollars was spent on gym memberships by men last year (Cloud, 2000). It has becoming an increasingly growing trend for urban men to participate in some form of exercise associated with a gym. Whether it be aerobics, lifting weights, cardio-kickboxing, or yoga; men are a significant part of the exercise world. Along with this comes the barrage of images that these gyms portray. It is almost impossible to walk into a gym in North-America and not be exposed to numerous images of giant, muscled, lean men and women adorning the walls. These images are portrayed as success stories, correlating success in everyday life with success in the gym; and success in the gym means obtaining this phenomenal physique. Unfortunately, this physique is very unobtainable for the average male without the use of anabolic steroids and hormones coupled with stringent dieting and an extremely rigorous and demanding training regimen. These are the images that are creating the insecurity amongst our men, especially teenaged men, with regards to their bodies. “Among college men in Austria, France, and the USA, they found that most men believed they would be more attractive to women if they were 14 kilograms more muscular than they really were” (Morgan, 2000). The pursuit to obtain these chiseled bodies is fast becoming one of North-America’s favorite pastimes. Unfortunately, the means of obtaining this particular physique comes at a cost; the time and effort spent in the gym must be quite substantial and the supplements such as protein, creatine, and glutamine are quite expensive and unregulated. There is also the addition of anabolic steroids to one’s physical diet. These are substances that are now readily available on the black market, especially since the invention of the internet, and some are extremely potent. Most steroid users do so without the proper guidance from a licensed physician nor the competence to know exactly what they are doing. This ignorance can be extremely dangerous when one is injecting foreign substances into one’s body. They are also extremely expensive. One study suggests that “… abuse of anabolic steroids-drugs associated with substantial morbidity – by boys and men seeking to simply look bigger. In these cases, steroids are not taken for athletic performance, but simply to gain muscle. Epidemiologic data suggest that at lest one million – and possibly even two to three million – American men have used these drugs, often learning as young teenagers to inject themselves” (Pope, 2001). All of these things combined make the pursuit of obtaining the perfect body not only a time consuming one, but an expensive and dangerous one as well. Couple these things with an obsessive desire to achieve this perfect physique and you have an extremely dangerous and concerning combination.
To illustrate the lengths that a person suffering from the Adonis Complex might go to alter their body’s image, we shall look at a hypothetical day in this individual’s life. This person wakes early and goes for a rigorous forty-five minute jog. After completing this jog, the individual returns home to eat a breakfast consisting of 10 eggs and oatmeal as well as a fistful of vitamins. This person then prepares themselves for the day. They shower, shave, and then inject themselves with whatever anabolic steroid or hormone it is that they are currently using. Assuming they work, this person goes to work. Every break at work is accompanied by a protein shake as well as some for of carbohydrate. At lunchtime, he goes for another rigorous jog and returns to eat another full meal. Work continues through the afternoon interspersed with at least 3 small meals before he leaves work. After work, this individual attends the gym; lifting weights for upwards of 2 hours, with the intensity of an Olympic athlete. More jogging is added at the end of this workout. This man then leaves the gym and heads for home where another meal awaits him. Throughout the course of the evening this individual may eat up to 3 more times, making a total of 8-12 meals he’s eaten throughout the day. This cycle may continue for years.
To aide this individual’s pursuit of gaining the perfect muscled physique is the use of anabolic steroids and hormones. Some of the more common steroids used by bodybuilders today include nandralone decanate, boldenone undecyclenate, stanozolol (made famous by Ben Johnson), trenbolone acetate. These drugs are used to help accumulate more muscle than the body was meant to have, thrusting the individual past the normal plateaus of the human body and creating dramatic results. The problem is that these drugs are often being administered by individuals with absolutely no medical training nor any knowledge of the substances that they are taking. These men are aware that these drugs will make them more muscular and many could care less what these drugs do to their bodies in the long run or what the proper way of administration is. The human body creates 112 mg of testosterone a week. Some bodybuilders supplement their hormones to such an extent that their testosterone levels exceed 1200 mg per week, which is ten times the normal level! The side effects associated with steroid and hormone use include such things as depression, mood swings, acne, over-aggressiveness, impotence, sterility, kidney damage, liver damage, and in some very extreme cases, death.

The most concerning problem of muscle dysmorphia and the Adonis Complex is that it is not a recognized disorder. Women have a plethora of resources available to them when it comes to eating and image disorders. There are no resources readily available to men. “Some student-health directors say they see an increasing number of college men who have eating disorders or unhealthy obsessions with their appearance – although few if any colleges have set up programs tailored to men” (Morgan, 2002). If a woman has a problem with eating or the way she looks, there are always hundreds of councilors, hundreds of dieticians, and hundreds of health care professional’s lining up to aide them. Yet, if a man claims he may have an eating disorder, the chance of being ridiculed is extremely likely. Not only may this individual be ridiculed by those he has attempted to gain help from, but the actual resources that those individuals can offer are extremely limited. Our society as a whole has not helped in any way with regards to this issue. Imagine a two hundred and sixty pound man, with rippling pectoral and bicep muscles walking into an eating disorder clinic and claiming to have a problem. Most people would find this funny as our society has deemed this physique to be a healthy one. Unfortunately the methods to obtain this physique are definitely not healthy in any way. One study noted that; “None of them (men ) sought help for eating disorders or eating problems because weight and shape concerns have been stigmatized as a problem that only affects women” (Morgan, 2002). It is still deemed “un-masculine” for a man to admit to having an eating disorder or a problem with their body image. It is even more “un-masculine” to discuss with one’s peers a male view of gaining weight, that weight gain and the bulging of a waistline should be dealt with privately instead of publicly.

It should be noted that not all men who strive to look good or who participate in rigorous physical activity suffer from the Adonis Complex. It is those that take their physical appearance to the next level; People who put their entire lives into attempting to obtain the muscles that our society has deemed attractive. Signs that someone may be suffering from an eating disorder may include; depression, insecurity concerning their bodies, obsessive behavior, excessive exercise, a preoccupation with model appearance, the use of large amounts of dietary supplements, rapid fluctuations in weight, dangerous weight loss techniques, excessive grooming, a need to be constantly reassured about their appearance, and avoidance of social activities (Cowling, 2002). Just because an individual spends an hour a day in the gym and jogs in the morning does not mean they are sick or have acquired the Adonis Complex. It is the individual who has lost contact with their friends and family, has poor work or school performance, and who works out numerous hours everyday that may suffer from this complex. It is only the extreme cases that should be categorized as ill.

Although our society will never be free of ailments such as the Adonis Complex and other body dysmorphic disorders, efforts must be made to minimize the occurrence of these disorders. It is foolish to think that only women could perceive themselves in a negative light because of the way society portrays the ideal physique. It may be even worse for men because of the lack of recognition of the disorders with regards to men, lack of resources available to men, and the lack of moral support that our society is willing to give these individuals. Why are women the only ones given the luxury of being allowed to be self-conscious and ashamed of their bodies? Why are men not allowed to share in this insecurity? These are issues that need to be addressed with clarity and care. These are issues that, if society as a whole cannot change, will forever be imbedded in the male psyche. As one researcher stated; “It’s time to take our Saturday morning cartoons off the juice” (Pope, 2000).


References:

Addictions.net (2003) The Adonis Complex. www.addictions.net/adonis_complex.htm, March 26, 2003.

Batty, David (2003).Do you have the Adonis Complex? www.netdoctor.co.uk/menshealth /feature/adonis.htm. Netdoctor.co.uk.

Cloud, John (2000). Never Too Buff. Time Magazine, Vol. 155, Issue 16

Cowling, Tanya K. (2003). The Adonis Complex: Is your son at risk? Family TLC, http://familytlc.net/adonis_complex_pre.html

Dickinson, Amy (2000). Measuring Up. Time Magazine, Vol. 156, Issue 21.

Morgan, John (2000). From Charles Atlas to Adonis Complex – Fat is more than a Feminist Issue. Journal of American Sociology, Vol. 356, Issue 9239.

Morgan, Richard (2002). The Men in the Mirror. Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol.49, Issue 5.

Pope, Harrison D. (2003) Unraveling the Adonis Complex. Psychiatric Times, March 2001, Vol. 108, Issue 3.

Rauch, Jonathan (2000). Buff Enough? Reason Magazine, Vol.32, Issue 6









I got an A on this fucker.....hope it helps.
 
Top Bottom