Anti e's and gains

[diesel2]

Most bbers swear by anti e's for their cycles but I was wondering how much or if these actually take away from the gains. In my experiences I have ran liquidex with one cycle and another I did not and the cycle I did not use liquid I blew up alot more. Also could of been the choice of AS but I wanted to get some ideas on this....

 

[Zyglamail]

Blew up a lot more with water gian or muscle gain? Dont confuse the two.

 

[Greek Freak]

Most anti-e's will take away some gains but as johnboy said with liquidex you prob wouldnt even notice. With something like nolvadex or arimadex it would be more noticable but a lot of times its just water your not gaining and not really hurting your muscle gains much.

 

[Cro Magnon]

Depends on what kind of "gains" you mean.

If you're using AS for aesthetic purposes, anti-e's won't hurt you at all (unless your ideal physique is the Stay Puffed Marshmallow Man).

If you're using AS for strength, however, anti-e's will indeed hinder your gains.

CM

 

[diesel2]

I blew up meaning muscle gains. Gained about 15 pounds of muscle that I kept when I didnt take any anti e's. I just didnt get as good of results when I took the l-dex and nolva on cycle even though the compounds were different. It definately didnt hinder my strength, when I was on my weights went through the roof (probably the dbol). Props for the feedback...

 

[Canuck4]

Actually nolva thru a whole cycle does hinder gains. Liquidex is very minimal in hindering gains. It keeps away water weight and bloat. On the other hand femara I heard doesnt hinder gains and actually adds to gains. So you might wanna give that a try also.
My previous cycle I ran Liquidex ED and didnt notice any bloat or water retention. I like that.

 

[diesel2]

Hey Canuck4

I am def. going to try out femara for my next sus, eq, clen cycle. I think Ill steer clear of deca on this one.