FreakMonster
New member
TPH said:FreakMonster: thanks for that reading!!! It was educational and it takes alot of the jargon out of what we all were saying.
I understand your first piece in that the study is indicating that there is a correlation between the A50 and cancer female rats.
Freak, with respect, I am not sure what this says about a steriod user doing 25mg of Anadrol spread out over the whole day for 4 weeks. I am not disputing the study, but MAYBE its implications.
I'm not sure about this,but did the subject show signs of cancer while on equal doses of dbol, or any other AS.
Maybe these questions don't make sense, but blinding saying anadrol will cause cancer doesn't make sense to me. Any AS will cause serious health problems if not used right.
Again, I know plenty of guys, myself included, whom have used upwards of 150mgs of a50 for short periods and haven't had serious sides.
The study did not show signs of cancer for other AS's.
It basically says there was equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity of oxymetholone in male rats. Equivocal Evidence of Carcinogenic Activity is demonstrated by studies that are interpreted as showing a marginal increase of neoplasms that may be chemically related. Extrapolation of these results to other species and quantitative risk analyses for humans require wider analyses beyond the purview of these studies. Selection per se is not an indicator of a chemical's carcinogenic potential.