Allon
New member
Bigbear said:4everhung, thanks man. Everything I write or say is always sincere and I truly want and mean it. I really don't see good things happening in our immediate future. I know one person cannot change everything but I have a lot of ideas and am very ambitious. I love the sciences, I love the application of them and I love myself (Anyone who sees this last point as arrogance is missing what love I am talking about). I really want to make a significant impact on the world before my time is up and I feel that before we can solve any other issue plaguing society we must atleast fix ourselves first, fixing meaning be in sufficient physical condition to function. I am currently testing a cancer treatment hypothesis that is very simple in its premises yet can be so effective. We'll see how it turns out by this fall. Also I am in the NPC Teen Nationals this weekend so that is pretty big too, I'll keep everyone posted.
Allon: You're entitled to how you feel about low-carb diets, but if you could explain just exactly you're "really against" it would help understand why some people are so opposed. I don't think that any of the low-carb diets are all good but then again no "diet" ever is. However I do feel that on a physiological level its premises are sound and are in concurrence with what we know about the body's reaction to different macronutrients. You even said yourself you agree that reducing carbs and reducing refined carbs is advisable.. so how is that not "low carb"? When you take out refined products such as white breads, baked goods, sodas, chips, etc. you can only eat so many carbohyrdate sources. That leaves you with veggies and fruits really,and I absolutely think that these foods are integral and should be eaten for their health benefits. I think there is a large misconception that low-carb means no carbohyrdate sources at all. This is wrong, both the misconception and the action. This is what I meant by extremes. If one macronutrient were unnecessary for humans or any organism it wouldn't exist. You can't eliminate an entire macro group. Each one has a place and time, like post-workout for example. Low-carb diets are an attempt to over-simplify a good idea for an American public. Oversimplification may be the problem in that the authors felt it would be easier to say no or very few carbs instead of accomodating to the millions of people individually who all can tolerate different amounts and need different sources at different times.
This is why I stress SELF-EDUCATION. The premise is good, but we all need to tailor our diets to our own bodies. For the most part, eating "low-carb" meaning meats, veggies, fruits, nuts, etc. is ideal and will help many maintain or achieve a body goal. As bodybuilders we know that carbohydrates have a time and place and by varying the amount we can either induce hypertrophy or lipolysis. The word "low" is relative to who is thinking or speaking. Low to me may be 50 grams while to others it may 100 g. So if you could tell me what you are really against it would help me understand why others are also against it, because like I said, its premises are sound just the oversimplification of it makes it less than ideal.
Alex
Wow, you are one talented 17 year old.
Also, you seem to be very idealistic, I like that. I hope you don't expect too much out of idealism though as you can be dissapointed a lot, but from your post you seem to be aware of this.
About the low carbs. I meant that the diest out there reccomend completely cutting out carbs down to somewhere between 20-40 grams a day and also to not eat all those carbs at once. I think that rice and fruits are evryday will have you above 100 grams which in my opinion is the minimum. I am not an expert at all, but it makes sense to eat enough carbs to feel good. and low carb diets ae actually "almost no carb diets" so I think that cutting down to soemwhere around 100 grams a day is probably good but even much more than that...