Agree/Disagree?

[gjohnson5]

Why don't you reread the part that YOU wrote in bold again. The last words says everything I needed to say...

Say it again. "Belief"

So yes , you do infact need reading classes. You contradicted yourself

LOL

"This is the line GW fed you..."

your response to my stating there was no strictly domestic wiretapping program


"This is why phone companies are denying his requests for phone records without a warrant. He is infact running a dragnet"

You not only said he was running a dragnet (domestic surveillance) but you attempted to evidence this claim by pointing to the phone companies as sharing your belief.

I read just fine. Not just my own posts, but others as well.

You have yet to master the former or the latter.

 

[Phenom78]

Why don't you reread the part that YOU wrote in bold again. The last words says everything I needed to say...

Say it again. "Belief"

So yes , you do infact need reading classes. You contradicted yourself

LOL @ peeps incapable of acknowledging an error.

Government work you said huh lol

 

[gjohnson5]

LOL @ peeps incapable of acknowledging an error.

Government work you said huh lol

Kinda like you calling Scottish people fags , you racist ignorant some bitch...

 

[Phenom78]

Kinda like you calling Scottish people fags , you racist ignorant some bitch...

Wow

LOL

You really must be your moms brightest lil guy. You keep up so well

Good luck to you maing.

Enjoy the rest of your life.

 

[gjohnson5]

Yeah , Like Scotsman said , I don't wanna have any dealings with you stupid ass either.

 

[nimbus]

the only reason people are making an issue of this is because of race. A lot you guys bash people who pop their collars. Maybe none of you should be allowed to become public servants because you might treat somebody who pops his collar unfairly.

Expressing distaste for a group of people is not sufficient evidence that your job performance will be compromised because of these feelings. One of the major foundations of our society is that we are only held accountable for our actions, not our thoughts. From what jestro is saying his posts were just expressions of his thoughts, and not attempts to incite any criminal acts

 

[cboogsrun]

the only reason people are making an issue of this is because of race. A lot you guys bash people who pop their collars. Maybe none of you should be allowed to become public servants because you might treat somebody who pops his collar unfairly.

Expressing distaste for a group of people is not sufficient evidence that your job performance will be compromised because of these feelings. One of the major foundations of our society is that we are only held accountable for our actions, not our thoughts. From what jestro is saying his posts were just expressions of his thoughts, and not attempts to incite any criminal acts

He's not expressing distaste for a group of people of whom he doesn't share beliefs with. Such as feminist groups or peta, he's basing his distaste strictly from a physical perspective of color. They are born black, jewish, hispanic, ect... He's judging people with out even knowing them. Which usually wouldnt affect his job, but he's a cop. That is a serious issue.

 

[Dial_tone]

the only reason people are making an issue of this is because of race.

well, duh! It's a racial issue.

 

[pdaddy]

No robocop can think. Therefroe he can have bias. Therefore you would keep him off the force.

In essence you want to penalize human nature.

Should I argue that a cop who posts on a virulent atheist website shouldnt be allowed to keep his job because he may or may not act biased towards those of faith?

Free thought and a free society are linked. You can't have one without the other.

Most atheists are not committed to the destruction of Christians, unlike the KKK who is. But there is a line of demarcation and most people know where to draw that line. Just as most people can identify what is pornography and what isn't, even if they can't put it in words, they know it when they see it. It's the same with freedom of speech and individual freedoms. People know what is over the line and what is not. This is over the line.

There is no such thing as a totally free society, if you did that would be called anarchy, not society, which implies some type of a social structure which you don't have in chaos and anarchy.

 

[jestro]

Most atheists are not committed to the destruction of Christians, unlike the KKK who is.

Do we know what web site it was he was posting on?
Rember when that Indian dude went postal, then it turned out he was posting on a "white power" type site? I found the site and read the Indian guys posts, and some of the other people posts. There was nothing about "destruction" of any other race.