Bulldog_10 said:
Why are you so against arimidex/liquidex
i'm not against liquidex, i'm just pissed that i can't afford it.. lol.
just for clarification, this post is by no means intended to flame liquidex usage... i just don't see how people can recommend it as a "must" in even first-timer's or beginner's cycles. i would rather be recommended a cycle that would give great gains with little sides and not require the use of liquidex than be recommended a more harsh cycle that requires liquidex as a must.
i personally can't justify the cost. there were so many greats that never had access to this stuff and they had terrific physiques. to me, i would rather know their work out techniques, their diets, and their cycles that they did, without liquidex, than to just jump into a 750-1000mg test/wk and 40mg dbol cycle that requires the use of liquidex to prevent me from becoming the staypuff marshmallow man with tits.
i seem to be flip flopping my purposes for writing this thread as i keep finding different points that i would like to address.
so, to recap the points i would like to address:
A. i want to know what kinds of cycles the greats of the past did - without liquidex - that helped them create the physiques that will forever live on in history. maybe they did the same cycles as today and either just
1. were more at ease with the bloat and less worried about gyno (maybe they knew that you either get it or you don't or perhaps nolva is all you really need)
2. or perhaps they knew a different technique to keep bloat and gyno away.. in which case if we did more research it could open more doors on how to do our AAS in a safer manner and by spending less money
B. these greats could have had entirely different cycles, where they fully minimized bloat and gyno while continuing to make great gains, than today's BBs and the secret is close at hand. again, we could do more research - i don't know, kidnap arnold until he tells us the secret - and we too could be spending less money and having great gains.
C. millions of others have started out, with probably the same exact cycles as are recommended today, but without liquidex, and have made great gains with no sides - so why do people on the board insist on recommending liquidex/arimidex as a must to beginner's cycles and having these guys spend their hard earned dollar on something that simply isn't a necessity.