Abortion is not killing a human life

[ajtomasi]

life is hard

death is easy

please kill the children

 

[gainer_uk]

Yeah, but a baby wouldn't be able to survive without someone to mother it once it's been born anyway. It's still dependant on the mother outside of the womb, just as it is on the inside.

So by your logic (leaving the breathing bit aside), the baby is not really alive outside of the womb either, because it would die without it's mother.

 

[ajtomasi]

what? a baby can be raised in a lab without any mother in sight.

 

[2Thick]

Yeah, but a baby wouldn't be able to survive without someone to mother it once it's been born anyway. It's still dependant on the mother outside of the womb, just as it is on the inside.

So by your logic (leaving the breathing bit aside), the baby is not really alive outside of the womb either, because it would die without it's mother.

Weak, very weak.

Eating is not necessary to exist but a pair of lungs is.

Try again.

 

[Dougly]

Great post! 2thick for mod

 

[gwl9dta4]

If someone takes a child from a mother, then she would do anything in the world to get it back (as long as she is normal).

That is a weakness.

OK, i fail to see your point on this statement as it is based on the emotion of being disagreeable.

 

[gainer_uk]

what? a baby can be raised in a lab without any mother in sight.

Dunno if this is directed at me?

If it is, then surely you should have worked out what i meant. In this case, the scientists would be acting as the mother, feeding it etc.

If the baby was alone, it would die.

 

[MidwestJ]

that's ridiculous. you're ridiculous.

 

[gainer_uk]

Weak, very weak.

Eating is not necessary to exist but a pair of lungs is.

Try again.

Ok, so we have a newborn baby and its mother abandons it.

Is the baby gonna think to itself "Hmmm, by the looks of it i'm gonna have to pop down the shops to get myself something to eat and drink if want to survive"?

OR is it more likely to just die?

----

Don't be an idiot.

The baby is going to die, it is completely dependant on it's mother just as it was dependant inside it's mother womb.

The only thing that is weak is your logic, but you seem to get very defensive when it is questioned.

I'm not against abortion by the way, simply making a point that could make you think a bit more about your argument and possibly stengthen it.

 

[gainer_uk]

Eating is not necessary to exist but a pair of lungs is.

Sorry to post twice, but I only just realised the stupidity of this.

Eating not necessary to exist?

Fuck... I've been wasting all this money on food for nothing!?