Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

A thick chick sport!

perkele

perkele

New member
Platinum
I watched women's alpine skiing world cup from TV today, and I must say there's plenty of thick chicks competing in that sport. Huge thighs and asses. :p

Top three:

51797702.jpg


The Swedish chick is about 180lbs

51797521.jpg

51797548.jpg


A good thick chick for wrestling and more... :chomp:
 
cycling and speed skating have some thick chicks too.
 
Greater mass = Greater speed

ie: the bigger you are the faster you go....Picabo Street is smaller now that she's no longer competing....
 
thicky thick! yeah.... kinda.... don't want em bigger than me I suppose.
 
shawnerk said:
thicky thick! yeah.... kinda.... don't want em bigger than me I suppose.
Click to expand...

neither do I but then i'm 240+ so that'd be a really big girl. :)
 
jenscats5 said:
Greater mass = Greater speed

ie: the bigger you are the faster you go....Picabo Street is smaller now that she's no longer competing....
Click to expand...


Really? I wouldn't have thought it would matter. Maybe the heavier you are the less friction you get because the top layer of ice will change to water under the skiis. I don't know. That's interesting.

Yep, I'm really a dork.
 
BradG said:
Really? I wouldn't have thought it would matter. Maybe the heavier you are the less friction you get because the top layer of ice will change to water under the skiis. I don't know. That's interesting.

Yep, I'm really a dork.
Click to expand...

Yeah really....it's like, physics or something.... greater mass = greater speed, something to that effect -- read about it in a ski magazine....
 
Lumberg said:
well yeah the heavier something is the greater the force of gravity pulling it down the hill
Click to expand...


No, sir. The acceleration due to gravity is the same regarless of the amount of mass.
 
jenscats5 said:
Yeah really....it's like, physics or something.... greater mass = greater speed, something to that effect -- read about it in a ski magazine....
Click to expand...
Also - larger people= more strength/force = increased momentum = greater initial velocity.
 
that's cuz the skinnier chicks quit after they break their first nail or toe. They can't handle the brute elements of downhill skiing.
 
If wind resistance and friction (skis against snow) are equal, two skiers will
accelerate at the same rate. (Like the experiment of dropping two unequal
weights in a vacuum.) Both will continue to accelerate until opposing forces
are equal and opposite. (equilibrium) The opposing forces are gravity on one
side and wind resistance and friction on the other. As the skiers continue
to pick up speed (accelerate), wind resistance increases exponentially until
equilibrium is reached and the skier then continues at constant velocity.
Equilibrium is where the difference occurs. The heavier skier will
theoretically accelerate for a longer time. When the forces acting on the
lighter skier reach equilibrium, she/he will continue at the equilibrium speed
while the heavier skier continues to accelerate until reaching equilibrium at
a higher speed (laughing at the lightweight left behind). If the hill
isn't long enough for the lighter skier to reach equilibrium, the two skiers
theoretically reach the bottom at the same time.
 
Dial_tone said:
If wind resistance and friction (skis against snow) are equal, two skiers will
accelerate at the same rate. (Like the experiment of dropping two unequal
weights in a vacuum.) Both will continue to accelerate until opposing forces
are equal and opposite. (equilibrium) The opposing forces are gravity on one
side and wind resistance and friction on the other. As the skiers continue
to pick up speed (accelerate), wind resistance increases exponentially until
equilibrium is reached and the skier then continues at constant velocity.
Equilibrium is where the difference occurs. The heavier skier will
theoretically accelerate for a longer time. When the forces acting on the
lighter skier reach equilibrium, she/he will continue at the equilibrium speed
while the heavier skier continues to accelerate until reaching equilibrium at
a higher speed (laughing at the lightweight left behind). If the hill
isn't long enough for the lighter skier to reach equilibrium, the two skiers
theoretically reach the bottom at the same time.
Click to expand...


You are assuming an equal frontal area and drag coefficient, right? That's the thing that hung me up.

Very nice, btw.
 
Last edited:
As in cycling the difference in frontal area isn't that significant when both are in the tuck position. Most of the extra weight is hidden from the wind.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Richardbrown
Napsgear: Beach Body or Body Builder: Training and Nutrition Differ for Each
Replies
13
Views
3K
StevenDarwinMD
StevenDarwinMD
B
Are Prostitutes Better Than Normal Women?
Replies
49
Views
57K
NAVIRA
N
L
Kettlbell workouts and nutrition for superior results
Replies
0
Views
3K
LifeofaFighter
L
E
HELP please?! My pre-contest cycle/meal plan/training... I need advice!
Replies
14
Views
5K
earthquakeawake
E
T
Did anyone get this e-mail?
Replies
5
Views
2K
stevesmi
stevesmi
Top Bottom