atlantabiolab
New member
Re: Re: Re: A challenging chore to start?.................
If you noticed in my post I mentioned the WORLD when I spoke of the problem of obesity, not European nations, which comprise a smaller portion of the total populace. In the majority of the world access to food is the limiting variable for obesity. Also, access to variety of food is a major contributor for food related diseases. Japanese women who immigrate to the US raise their level of breast cancer to that of US women, due mainly to eating the American diet. They have every right to eat their native foods, but choose to eat an American diet.
Diet is personal and cultural and the major principle I was aiming at was that the "epidemic" of obesity is only a problem in a socialized medical setting. If you eat yourself to death, you are not a problem to anyone save yourself, but in a public health care setting you then become the problem of the society. This is the logic government has used to force itself further into the lives of the citizens, with smoking, guns, diet, and drugs. If others pay for something that you use, then we can restrict your actions. This is why the socialized medical system perpetuates government growth and power. Soon we will have government intrusion into our food choices, as T-Boy was alluding to, to prevent this "epidemic" of obesity, then heart disease, then diabetes, ad nauseum. Since the group pays for your care, we must control the group's actions to lower costs.
Agreed, but a large portion of this is from frivilous lawsuits which could be thrown out by judges, but they almost never throw out cases anymore.
Agreed. I have no problem with considering litigation and incarceration as real problems of government, my dissent was of the idea that personal health is the responsibility of government.
MattTheSkywalker said:
Many European countries have equal access to food. They are not equally obese. Moreover, the poorest people in the US are the fattest; it's not like in ancient Rome where the people starve as the rich pig out.
If you noticed in my post I mentioned the WORLD when I spoke of the problem of obesity, not European nations, which comprise a smaller portion of the total populace. In the majority of the world access to food is the limiting variable for obesity. Also, access to variety of food is a major contributor for food related diseases. Japanese women who immigrate to the US raise their level of breast cancer to that of US women, due mainly to eating the American diet. They have every right to eat their native foods, but choose to eat an American diet.
Diet is personal and cultural and the major principle I was aiming at was that the "epidemic" of obesity is only a problem in a socialized medical setting. If you eat yourself to death, you are not a problem to anyone save yourself, but in a public health care setting you then become the problem of the society. This is the logic government has used to force itself further into the lives of the citizens, with smoking, guns, diet, and drugs. If others pay for something that you use, then we can restrict your actions. This is why the socialized medical system perpetuates government growth and power. Soon we will have government intrusion into our food choices, as T-Boy was alluding to, to prevent this "epidemic" of obesity, then heart disease, then diabetes, ad nauseum. Since the group pays for your care, we must control the group's actions to lower costs.
LOL!
The prevalence of litigation is such a drain on our economy that if you stopped admitting lawyers to the bar for 10 years, things would get better. Our litigious society has added costs to every business transaction and insurance premium.
Agreed, but a large portion of this is from frivilous lawsuits which could be thrown out by judges, but they almost never throw out cases anymore.
I agree but you know that the war on Drugs is window dressing for a bigger problem between the citizenry and government.
The litigation and incarceration problems can be fixed TODAY by government action.
Agreed. I have no problem with considering litigation and incarceration as real problems of government, my dissent was of the idea that personal health is the responsibility of government.