Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

911 Conspiracy?

spongebob said:
ok, i just read that the esteemed general believed it was four seperate detonations set off in four different coulmn locations. i gues they must have went off at exactly the same time as the truck bomb. or are we disputing there was even a truck bomb?

You get a little irritable when discussing opinions that differ from you own, huh?

Nobody is disputing the truck bomb. General Partin and other noteworthy experts concluded columns in the Murrah Federal Building could only have been obliterated from charges placed inside the structure and were detonated shortly before or after the truck bomb blast.
 
As a side note, several national and regional news broadcasts aired the day of the OKC bombing confirmed 2 other undetonated explosive devices were removed from the building by ATF agents.

Alex Jones "Road to Tyranny" gives a lot of attention the to OKC bombing and includes extensive mainstream media video footage the day of the blast confirming multiple bombs were removed from the building.
 
Forge said:
There were actually a total of three truck bombs. The one that detonated was the smallest one, while the two other larger truck bombs never went off. It is documented that one of the internal supporting columns was destroyed at the base of the building, this is only possible if a bomb was detonated at the base, inside the building. The outside truck bomb could not have done that damage. Also, much of the building blew outward, not inward as would be the case if the truck bomb was the only bomb present.
kind of like Kennedy's head having exit wounds on the wrong damned side eh?

Guess you can do sloppy work like that when you are the investigation.


Who investigates the investigators? You got it............the "conspiracy" guys. :)
 
Burning_Inside said:
Dude you are just a joke. You are prime example of someone who gets one thing stuck in their head and then that's it, your mind is locked up, closed up safe and sound to anything else on the matter.

If unquestionable evidence ever surfaced from any source other than you esteemed "credible" sources that this whole thing was indeed a set up, you would probably discount it anyway. Kinda like an athiest, assinine enough to still discount god if proof of his existance was shoved in the person's face.

You just seem to know everything about everything on this matter. It's awesome. You are my hero. You must have read every reputable interview from every reputable person in every reputable magazine or book which were obviously all done in controlled repuutable environments. I'm also sure you have a ton of reputable controlled environment friends from 1000 reputable walks of life that have provided you with unwavering reputable controlled insight.

P.S: I don't fucking drink.

you might as well said something about my momma, it would hold as much validity as you other assumptions. and im sorry i got under your skin so easily, but you admittedly threw the first blow.

the fact is that you jump in the convo and tried to make me sound silly, i then just asked you why in the world are you qouting the gaurdian(reputable or not) without even understanding what a joint or joise is.

and lastly, im just giving you my opinion after what i have read and from what little knowleadge and experience i have. just because you didnt change my opinion or even come close to a respectful rebuttal of my arguement and questions doesnt mean i think im a expert in the matter.

obviously your mind is made up also, obviously if i dont think like you or agree with you im close minded. obviously you have notthing better to say than try to start making assumptions about me. stick to the debate and dont get your little feelings hurt so easy. its nothing personal, im just counter arguements on hear with what i believe are the most possible scenarios.

so lighten up francis.
 
Forge said:
There were actually a total of three truck bombs. The one that detonated was the smallest one, while the two other larger truck bombs never went off. It is documented that one of the internal supporting columns was destroyed at the base of the building, this is only possible if a bomb was detonated at the base, inside the building. The outside truck bomb could not have done that damage. Also, much of the building blew outward, not inward as would be the case if the truck bomb was the only bomb present.

we should have started a new thread on the murrah federal building. do you have a link to any article about three bombs.

i read that the govt actually had a missile stored at the building.

i read a report on the seismic activities recorded fron the truck bomb and says there is no evidence of any second explosions. it explicitly stated that the activity that was recorded by two different locations was from a single energy source.

it also compared the siesmic activity of the actual demolition of the remains of the building and that they were similar in but different in seismic activity.
 
buddy28 said:
You get a little irritable when discussing opinions that differ from you own, huh?

Nobody is disputing the truck bomb. General Partin and other noteworthy experts concluded columns in the Murrah Federal Building could only have been obliterated from charges placed inside the structure and were detonated shortly before or after the truck bomb blast.

i was only joking, i like writting my post like most of the conspiracy sites like to write.

read what i just wrote in my post above. find the study that was done of the siesmic activity recorded from two different locations during the truck bomb explosion. i believe it stated the activity recorded was from a single source of activity, that was there findings.
 
buddy28 said:
As a side note, several national and regional news broadcasts aired the day of the OKC bombing confirmed 2 other undetonated explosive devices were removed from the building by ATF agents.

Alex Jones "Road to Tyranny" gives a lot of attention the to OKC bombing and includes extensive mainstream media video footage the day of the blast confirming multiple bombs were removed from the building.

i have a link to an article that states the govt actually had a missile stored in the building, maybe there is some confusion about this. it did say that atf agents had to remove it.
 
Quick...Someone call 911! Domino's is at the door! Christ its hot in here!

4906205April2004m_086-med.JPG
 
spongebob said:
i was only joking, i like writting my post like most of the conspiracy sites like to write.

No problemo :)

spongebob said:
read what i just wrote in my post above. find the study that was done of the siesmic activity recorded from two different locations during the truck bomb explosion. i believe it stated the activity recorded was from a single source of activity, that was there findings.

Isn't this the same type of data you claimed a few posts back couldn't be relied upon to yeild a conclusive determination of a bombing event?

Tell me you're not a backpeddler Mr spongebob square pants.
 
buddy28 said:
No problemo :)



Isn't this the same type of data you claimed a few posts back couldn't be relied upon to yeild a conclusive determination of a bombing event?

Tell me you're not a backpeddler Mr spongebob square pants.

im not sure which data you are talking about. let me go back and read the thread. because i dont remember anyone presenting specific data on anything, and definitely not recorded data.

im not sure how conclusive seismic data interpretations can be. and im not sure if different analysis can be derived from different experts. but its just a counter to the conspriacy theory of mutiple explosions.
 
Top Bottom