Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

911 Conspiracy?

Wrongun

Plat Hero
Platinum
Ok i do enjoy a good conspiracy theory and some i have subscribed to and some i just can not see reasoning.

One that is gathering momentum is Sept 11th. THIS IS A DISCUSSION TOPIC AND NOT STATING AS MY VIEW. Here it is

Watch this amazing video. There’s plenty of evidence that 911 was an inside job, a massive vicious con, but no single piece of evidence is as clear and decisive as this amazing film taken by CNN and ABC – provided it’s viewed carefully in slow motion.

Just before impact, the plane that hits the south WTC tower (allegedly United Airlines Flight 175) fires a missile from the strange pod attached to its underside. Watch the clip several times. It’s unmistakable.

http://www.letsroll911.org/

What do you think?

Wrongun!
 
What use is a missile against a skyscraper? The plane (and fuel) impact would do far more damage than a missile strike, unless it was specially designed for it's target. One theory is that the burning jet fuel is what melted the structural beams, but the fuel would have been a flash fire and not sustainable for enough time to melt the beams. If the missile was designed to carry a substance that would sustain a fire at the temperatures long enough to melt the beams, that would explain a lot.

While those videos prove nothing, it is interesting. However, if there was something truly there then I doubt a website on the internet would be the first to notice. If something's there, someone more important would have found it by now.
 
Someone needs to clean up the video frame by frame. It can be done.


The plane hit the side of the building. Bad aim for us to believe in the way that the building collapsed.
 
Testosterone boy said:
Someone needs to clean up the video frame by frame. It can be done.


The plane hit the side of the building. Bad aim for us to believe in the way that the building collapsed.
Hello?

Anybody else notice this?

It struck the side of the building....not the main structural support system. Almost all of the burning would have occured on one side of the main support systems.
 
Top Bottom