Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
If you listen to both then how can you reasonably conclude George Bush is responsible for the weapons disapearing? You sir, are not listening to both sides but one and drawing conclusions based on very little fact, if it is fact at all.
I suggest you do more research on economics. The economy is going up, no doubt about it. Bush inherited a economic recession due to over inflation over the 90's. When a market climbs that rapidly it is inevitable. So let’s see, economy going down, now it is picking up, all in four years and even during a time of war. Hmmm who was in office the last four years? So therefore Bush did impact the economy as a direct result of his tax cuts.
History has proven over and over again, if you cut taxes the economy is stimulated. People have less money going to the government and therefore can decide what to do with it. The more money you have available the more money you will spend reinvesting it into stocks, business etc. etc. Clinton had a boom for many reasons but none of which he was responsible for. He raised taxes in, um, I think it was 94 but don't take that as a fact. The only reason he rode the wave for so long was because of long term tax planning from the Reagan administration and the technology boom. However it could not last forever and the economy started receding before he even left office. The democratic way has never worked and never will because there is no logic behind it. Talk about "throwing fiscal caution to the wind throughout this period when the US could ill afford it" look at Kerry's health care plan alone. He said he will not raise taxes on the middle class yet for him to apply the healthcare system he says he will, it will be impossible not to. He has all these so called "great plans" as the liberals call them yet he has no plan on how to get the money to make it work. This is just like the 90's when he voted to cut the military budget by 6 billion and now when we are running short on troops he says Bush didn't plan and now must reinstate the draft, which by the way is ludicrous, when it was his, Clinton’s and numerous other liberals decisions that affected our troops.
I don't have time to adaquetly respond to all these arguements because my homework is lacking since I have started in these debates. So unless I have a chance of getting you to use your head instead of your emotions I cannot respond any more until this weekend unless it is important.
I suggest you do more research on economics. The economy is going up, no doubt about it. Bush inherited a economic recession due to over inflation over the 90's. When a market climbs that rapidly it is inevitable. So let’s see, economy going down, now it is picking up, all in four years and even during a time of war. Hmmm who was in office the last four years? So therefore Bush did impact the economy as a direct result of his tax cuts.
History has proven over and over again, if you cut taxes the economy is stimulated. People have less money going to the government and therefore can decide what to do with it. The more money you have available the more money you will spend reinvesting it into stocks, business etc. etc. Clinton had a boom for many reasons but none of which he was responsible for. He raised taxes in, um, I think it was 94 but don't take that as a fact. The only reason he rode the wave for so long was because of long term tax planning from the Reagan administration and the technology boom. However it could not last forever and the economy started receding before he even left office. The democratic way has never worked and never will because there is no logic behind it. Talk about "throwing fiscal caution to the wind throughout this period when the US could ill afford it" look at Kerry's health care plan alone. He said he will not raise taxes on the middle class yet for him to apply the healthcare system he says he will, it will be impossible not to. He has all these so called "great plans" as the liberals call them yet he has no plan on how to get the money to make it work. This is just like the 90's when he voted to cut the military budget by 6 billion and now when we are running short on troops he says Bush didn't plan and now must reinstate the draft, which by the way is ludicrous, when it was his, Clinton’s and numerous other liberals decisions that affected our troops.
I don't have time to adaquetly respond to all these arguements because my homework is lacking since I have started in these debates. So unless I have a chance of getting you to use your head instead of your emotions I cannot respond any more until this weekend unless it is important.
Last edited:
