Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

$100,000 If You Can Prove Quantum Computers Impossible

hanselthecaretaker

High End Bro
Platinum
A researcher at MIT is promising to pay $100,000 to the individual or group of individuals who can prove that the creation of a functional and scalable quantum computer is impossible.


The award was prompted by an article describing the views of a quantum computing skeptic and a proponent. As part of the discussion Scott Aaaronson was challenged to support his opinion with real money, which he now did.

Aaronson himself believes that scalable quantum computers will be possible one day and he does not think that he will ever be forced to pay out the reward. To critics, who said that his challenge is similar to being asked to prove that there is no Bigfoot, he replied that there may be future discoveries in physics that could provide evidence against the quantum computer model, which would be enough for someone being entitled to collect the prize.

Aaronson said that he does not expect this evidence to ever surface, but he "would welcome [it] as the scientific thrill of [his] life." If he had to pay, he would consider it as an "honor" to do so: "For I’d then (presumably) simply be adding a little to the well-deserved Nobel Prize coffers of one of the greatest revolutionaries in the history of physics."

In an update, Aaronson now challenged skeptics to put up a prize for "a demonstration that scalable quantum computing is possible." He added that he is "certainly not offering such a prize."

$100,000 If You Can Prove Quantum Computers Impossible

Samoth in 3...2...
 
I don't think you can prove something is impossible. You can just fail to prove it's possible.
 
True. It's a defeatist attitude to say something isn't possible. Where would we be today if people thought like that.
 
hanselthecaretaker said:
Samoth in 3...2...


The answer is trivial.

Define the quantum computer’s state of existence as

|quantum computer>.

Since a quantum computer can either exist or not exist, we have

|quantum computer> = (|computer exits> + |computer doesn’t exist>)

And by linearity of normalized states,

|quantum computer> = (n|computer exits> + m|computer doesn’t exist>)

for |n|^2 + |m|^2 = 1.

From this we find the probability density of the summation of states as

(|pay out $100k> + |don’t pay out $100k>)/((2)^(1/2)),

and

<quantum computer possible|quantum computer impossible> = 1

is necessarily true.

QEFD.


:cow:
 
The answer is trivial.

Define the quantum computer’s state of existence as

|quantum computer>.

Since a quantum computer can either exist or not exist, we have

|quantum computer> = (|computer exits> + |computer doesn’t exist>)

And by linearity of normalized states,

|quantum computer> = (n|computer exits> + m|computer doesn’t exist>)

for |n|^2 + |m|^2 = 1.

From this we find the probability density of the summation of states as

(|pay out $100k> + |don’t pay out $100k>)/((2)^(1/2)),

and

<quantum computer possible|quantum computer impossible> = 1

is necessarily true.

QEFD.


:cow:

*exists
*exists

genius.
 
Top Bottom