Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

The Heavier White Women Are, The Less They Earn

George Spellwin

The Architect
Staff member
Administrator
Elite Moderator
Moderator
The heavier white working women are, the less money they make, a Cornell University researcher's study concludes.
Women who weighed 65 pounds more than other women in a sample of 1,442 white female workers earned an average 7 percent less than their slimmer colleagues, when other factors were controlled for statistically.

That difference in income is roughly equivalent to the wage effect of one year of education, two years of continuous employment at one job or three years of work experience.

However, the same relationship between weight and income did not hold true for Hispanic and African American working women, says John Cawley, a health policy scholar, economist and an assistant professor of policy analysis and management at Cornell.

Cawley found only weak evidence that overweight Hispanic women earn less, and no evidence that the wages of overweight black women are affected. Cawley also found no evidence that weight affects the probability of employment for white, black or Hispanic women, or the probability of holding a white-collar job.

Cawley, who presented his findings at the Robert Wood Johnson Conference on the Politics of Obesity in Burlington, Vt., in June, analyzed data in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth on 2,843 white, black and Hispanic females over as many as 12 years up to 1998.

Cawley's analysis controlled for weight in alternate ways: weight both in pounds (holding constant height in inches) and body mass index, a measure of weight for height that is the standard measure of fatness in medicine and epidemiology.

He also controlled for many other factors that affect wages, such as education, measures of intelligence, number of years at the current job and local unemployment rates.

The average weight of women in the sample was 148.6 pounds. The difference between women at the average weight and those who weighed more than 95 percent of the sample was 65 pounds.

Previous studies of this question also have found that some heavier women earn less. However, those studies were unable to determine whether the correlation was the result of weight lowering wages, low wages raising weight, or perhaps some unobserved third factor causing both high weight and low wages.

The innovation of Cawley's work is to use the econometric method known as instrumental variables to determine whether weight truly lowers wages; the results of this method suggest that weight does have such an effect, but only for white women. Cawley also attempts to improve on previous studies by using a sample that was surveyed over a longer period of time, and by correcting for reporting error in weight and height.

"It should be stressed, however, that the finding that weight lowers wages is not conclusive evidence of workplace discrimination," Cawley points out. "Another hypothesis also consistent with these findings is that heavier workers are less productive at work. It has repeatedly been found, for example, that obese workers are more likely to miss work due to illness. However, this explanation is complicated by the fact that the analysis finds no evidence that weight lowers wages for black women."

Nevertheless, he points out that the finding that weight lowers certain women's wages has become increasingly important in the last two decades. The percentage of Americans who meet the clinical definition of obesity has risen from 15 percent in 1980 to 23 percent in 1990 to 26 percent in 1999.

The study currently is a working paper of the National Bureau of Economic Research and is available for downloading free of charge from this URL. - By Susan S. Lang
 
Extremely interesting, though it seems almost common sense. It doesn't surprise me. It's scary to see it scientifically proven though.
 
I think affirmative action, as it's been practiced in recent decades, may account for the difference here. If you doubt that, go to your local government office (the DMV for example) and see how long it takes the 400 lb. female supervisor to saunter from her desk to the window to help you.

Clearly weight is not adversely affecting HER earning power!;)
 
WarLobo said:
Mind if I slap this over to the women's board... even better, they would freak out if you popped in over there...

I put a copy there.
 
Its interesting -- we live in a society that is fairly unrestrictive as far as government (e.g. oppression, etc.), but that very society is what restricts us because of its focus (I suppose human tendency too) on how people look vs. their ability to perform a task. Weight is really a very sad discriminator. But at the same time, talk about motivation to stay at an optimal weight.....

This is also one of the first things I've seen where white women are the category being discriminated against. (Not that it doesn't make you think, but its usually white men...)

Thx George -- it sucks but its reality. Its good to get a taste of reality every now and then.
 
Sad but believable. Fat or not, this probably explains why most people think they look better with a tan. I know I do (even if it's only a fake tan).
 
I would not hire a fat person if I could find a thinner person with the same skills. It's that simple. Ask any health insurance actuarial what the statistical difference in health claims is between a normal weight person and an obese person and you'll feel the same. Even worse if you're an employer in America where you're expected to provide health benefits for your employees.

As much as obese people protest that it's not their fault that they're obese, the truth is that obesity is one of the few chronic diseases that people have control over compared to having, say, MS, Parkinson's, Huntington's, etc.....

I also would not hire someone who admitted to being a chronic smoker or alcoholic, or even if they looked like a chronic smoker/alcoholic. Does that make me a redneck???
 
MS said it exactly...its a health risk to employers! Also first impressions are everything in the business world..You want someone that takes care of themselves to represent your company and product etc...
 
In my location and area, I would have to disagree. Living in Dallas I was able to secure good-paying employment with no problem, but once I moved back home to a small west Texas town, I could not get work to save my life. The reason being......"I was too pretty" This came straight from the mouth of one of my interviewers. In this area, you have to be at least 30 pounds overweight and not the least bit attractive. The only job I could get was waitressing and I am a college graduate. People are too intimidated by looks and scared you will run off with their husbands. Being in shape has definitely been points against me as far as earning more money. I could be making quite a bit more if I just had a bigger derriere!!! Not a sacrifice I am willing to make. I finally found a job that rewards my mind for actually thinking!!!! But it took me two years. And I still do not make what I am worth. Does someone have an explanation for that?

Mrs. TG
 
Top Bottom