Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
.jpg "Research Chemical Sciences")
.png "Research Chemical Sciences")
Which is a better mass builder Deca or Fina??
- Thread starter dirtyluke1
- Start date
Nighthawkk
New member
Dial_tone said:
I agree. I use Deca in longer bulk cycles, and limit my Tren use to shorter cutting cycles. They are both excellent though.
S
satchboogie
Guest
i cant believe nobody here addressed a serious issue regarding the two substances...
deca is manufactured by several human grade pharmaceutical companies.
tren isnt!
so with tren, you're basiclaly forced to go underground.
with deca, more choices.
also, keep in mind that fina has WAY more sides than deca.
listen, deca has been around and has proven to be a very effective choice for bulking and/or cutting. stick with it trooper!
deca is manufactured by several human grade pharmaceutical companies.
tren isnt!
so with tren, you're basiclaly forced to go underground.
with deca, more choices.
also, keep in mind that fina has WAY more sides than deca.
listen, deca has been around and has proven to be a very effective choice for bulking and/or cutting. stick with it trooper!
L
lartinos
Guest
Thats why making it yourself isn't that bad of an idea. If you can handle the sides tren all the way in my book. Deca is Tren's little brother that is slightly less annoying. We are talking results here and the stuff is amazing for that.satchboogie said:
BodyByFinaplix said:
I dont know if you are chuckling at me about this .. or what? What is the big joke? Every one knows that they are the same thing. The reason that I would choose it over regular deca is because you can run it for a short period of time. Whats the point of running nandrolone decanoate for 5 weeks? There IS a point of running NPP for that long, you will actually see your gains in that time frame.
Similar threads
