SteelWeaver
New member
Alright, I know this is going to cause a bit of debate, but debate is always a good way to get folks thinking. So, I'd like to know if the whole thing about PL's being too thick/disproportionate for BB'ing is really a myth. Now, spatts, this doesn't apply to you - we already know you have some lovely genes flowing through your tiny waist ... I'm just asking in general. Does PL'ing result in a less "eye-pleasing" physique (from a BB'ing judge's point of view) than strict BB'ing training????
Are the cross-over PL/BB'ers the genetically lucky ones - strong AND shapely? Or are the majority of PL'ers (I'm talking WOMEN here), thick in the wrong places for BB'ing?
Please note - I'm asking this because I don't know, not just to fire a debate. I want to try WSB PL training, but I have a pretty huge waist to start with - am I going to ruin the small chance I have to be reasonably good at BB'ing by following a PL routine? How important is it for a BB'er to be that strong? We already know there isn't a direct correlation between strength and size .....
Opinions?
Are the cross-over PL/BB'ers the genetically lucky ones - strong AND shapely? Or are the majority of PL'ers (I'm talking WOMEN here), thick in the wrong places for BB'ing?
Please note - I'm asking this because I don't know, not just to fire a debate. I want to try WSB PL training, but I have a pretty huge waist to start with - am I going to ruin the small chance I have to be reasonably good at BB'ing by following a PL routine? How important is it for a BB'er to be that strong? We already know there isn't a direct correlation between strength and size .....
Opinions?