Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

You're all completely average

Better to be average than to be coming up short, mr. 3 inches. Thats what your mommy told me anyway.She caught you whacking it the other day and just didn't say anything, as to not embarass you. She did take pics though and spread them all over the internet.
 
hardrock said:
Better to be average than to be coming up short, mr. 3 inches. Thats what your mommy told me anyway.She caught you whacking it the other day and just didn't say anything, as to not embarass you. She did take pics though and spread them all over the internet.

Turn the burner off cause man, I'm done.
 
It's impossible for everyone to be average. Then there wouldn't be any averages at all just modes.
 
WODIN said:
It's impossible for everyone to be average. Then there wouldn't be any averages at all just modes.

Mathematically speaking, WODIN, you're wrong there. Every group of data has a mean or average. For example the mean of {3} is 3. The mean of {3,3,3} is 3.

In the scenario you are postulating yes the median and the mode are the same but you cannot say that there is no average.
 
Lumberg said:


Mathematically speaking, WODIN, you're wrong there. Every group of data has a mean or average. For example the mean of {3} is 3. The mean of {3,3,3} is 3.

In the scenario you are postulating yes the median and the mode are the same but you cannot say that there is no average.

Technically true, however the mean and mode being equal negates an real terms in deviation which the whole point for the postulaiton of central tendancies. Given that everything first within a central construct then the very idea of averages wouldn't exist.
 
Technically true, however the mean and mode being equal negates an real terms in deviation which the whole point for the postulaiton of central tendancies. Given that everything first within a central construct then the very idea of averages wouldn't exist.

The natural sigma distribution among the sample population dramatically differs from the aggregate construction and implementation of the average factorization. The postulation of the method being average indicates the extinction of the naturally occuring errors and chaotic factors prevalent in the real life practical application of the statistical tendencies for precise evaluation. Though the probability of mean and mode being equavalent to each other theoretically exists, such use in the practical means is limited to severely restricted mathematical practices.
 
revexrevex said:


The natural sigma distribution among the sample population dramatically differs from the aggregate construction and implementation of the average factorization. The postulation of the method being average indicates the extinction of the naturally occuring errors and chaotic factors prevalent in the real life practical application of the statistical tendencies for precise evaluation. Though the probability of mean and mode being equavalent to each other theoretically exists, such use in the practical means is limited to severely restricted mathematical practices.

You don't deadlift much at all do you?
 
WODIN said:


Technically true, however the mean and mode being equal negates an real terms in deviation which the whole point for the postulaiton of central tendancies. Given that everything first within a central construct then the very idea of averages wouldn't exist.

I think you left out a few words there but I think I get your point.

Being a big, intimidating fucker = your game.

Being a smarty pants = my game.

You don't see me getting all big and shit do you?
 
Wodin I challenge you to a pseudo-intellectual discussion pertaining to general philosophies of nature. DO you accept.
 
Top Bottom