Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Worm Holes And Other Things!

  • Thread starter Thread starter DcupSheepNipples
  • Start date Start date
D

DcupSheepNipples

Guest
If Worm Holes are the hypothetical theoretical connection between a black holes and a white holes!

And a Black Hole is a region in space where the velocity of escape exceeds the speed of light in that medium! When a star dies and begins to shrink a name is given to the size below which it must shrink in order to become a black hole! The name for this size is the star's "Schwarzchild Radius" and the primary factor which determines whether or not a star will shrink below it's Schwarzchild Radius is its initial mass! Schwarzschild Radius also called gravitational radius, distance that defines the size at which a spherical astronomical object such as a star becomes a black hole! A black hole is an object so dense that not even light can escape the pull of its gravitational force!

And a White Holes are the theoretical exact opposite of black holes, and their existence is implied by a negative square root solution to the Schwarzchild metric! The Schwarzchild metric is based on General Relativity, which is time symmetric! Which means that the most technical definition of white hole is simply a black hole running backwards in time! It is a location in space time that, instead of being impossible to escape, is impossible to reach!

Now lets forget that theoretically that a Black Hole is impossible to escape and a White Hole is impossible to reach!

How come the people of Earth have not been visted by Alien Beings or Time Travelers from the future in any large scale visible way to us? Or have they and they are really hinding amongst us?

Or could it be possible that they are hiding amongst us but are camouflaged by another Dimension that we can not see?
 
Nobody? MENSA? People or Sheeple can respond to? Anyone?
 
Many physists still argue the finer points of such topics. If your are well read on the topic, you will find that there are those who argue against such objects existence in anything more than a theoretical sense. No matter, unless you get off wondering about things you will never understand I'd rather stick to thongs and bikinimom rants.
 
SV2 said:
Many physists still argue the finer points of such topics. If your are well read on the topic, you will find that there are those who argue against such objects existence in anything more than a theoretical sense. No matter, unless you get off wondering about things you will never understand I'd rather stick to thongs and bikinimom rants.

Yes but I'm going for a hypothetical theoretical answer! I'm well read on the subject! I just want some other hypothetical theoretical answer from different types of Sheeple, People etc! I'm not looking for a text book answer per say! Even a PoyeBoy rant answer is welcomed! Thanks for the effort though! I prefer MENSA Porn over bikinimon rants, but that's just me!
 
Personally I think wormholes will never be able to be traveled through they last less than a split second and the theory is that if you were to expand them beyond there original microscopic size that it would implode. This is the universes way of regulating time travel. Because I would'nt even want to see what would happe If someone went back in time & killed their mother beccause that be the ultimate paradox.
 
It's been theorized that given the estimated size of the known universe, and its density, the escape velocity of this body is greater than the speed of light. hence the universe itself is a black hole.

What might be outside this black hole -- a singularity in a macro universe, etc. etc. Given that all laws of physics breaks down inside the black hole, what might the laws of physics of that macro universe be?

Could the big bang creating our universe merely be the other side of a black hole that formed in that macro universe some 15 billion of our years ago?
 
SV2 said:
Personally I think wormholes will never be able to be traveled through they last less than a split second and the theory is that if you were to expand them beyond there original microscopic size that it would implode. This is the universes way of regulating time travel. Because I would'nt even want to see what would happe If someone went back a killed their mother beccause that be the ultimate paradox.

Yes Time Travel Paradoxes do suck! So it sounds like you are a skeptic or at the very least want to be one because you fear the consequences if they truly exist! But if that is the case we may really be alone or at least we can not be reached!
 
DcupSheepNipples said:


Yes Time Travel Paradoxes do suck! So it sounds like you are a skeptic or at the very least want to be one because you fear the consequences if they truly exist! But if that is the case we may really be alone or at least we can not be reached!

If there is life out there.. we have a good enough chance finding it in our own galaxy... we dont need to worry about other parallel universes. Besides, the whole notion of backward time travel Kinda makes you think about the whole edipus thing a little differently.
 
SV2 said:


If there is life out there.. we have a good enough chance finding it in our own galaxy... we dont need to worry about other parallel universes. Besides, the whole notion of backward time travel Kinda makes you think about the whole edipus thing a little differently.

Life maybe, but Intellegent life in the Milky Way no in my opinion unless they traveled here from another galaxy!
 
LOL, fine then here goes........

dude Im pretty tore up right now so the reading stuff isnt working great for the old think pot
 
PoyeBoy said:
LOL, fine then here goes........

dude Im pretty tore up right now so the reading stuff isnt working great for the old think pot

Thanks for your attempt anyways! I know being a Leppy is sort of like being handicapped! So for this thread you get affirmative action! Your a Genius PoyeBoy!
 
yes, aliens do live among us. haven't you seen the movie the arrival with charlie sheen?
 
*** said:
yes, aliens do live among us. haven't you seen the movie the arrival with charlie sheen?

Great movie! A poor mans "Contact" if you will! Are you saying they are hostile then? :alien:
 
Very nice D-Cup,you know Huckster is very open minded to anything being possible!We know that time travel IS possible,as well as means of travel that far supercede anything currently known.Now the question is,has it already been going on in a time far ahead of us,and are there certain folks amonst us in this day and age that can already slip in and out?
 
HUCKLEBERRY FINNaplex said:
Very nice D-Cup,you know Huckster is very open minded to anything being possible!We know that time travel IS possible,as well as means of travel that far supercede anything currently known.Now the question is,has it already been going on in a time far ahead of us,and are there certain folks amonst us in this day and age that can already slip in and out?

It's a mind bender every day if you dwell on it! But I feel Time Travel is the most logical explantion of many of the paranormal or scientific questions that still face mankind today! Or should I say in this "Time!" But then again you would think they would have "Slipped Up" or is their technology so advanced they are able to defeat Human Nature and are infallible to create Time Travel Paradoxes or reveal themselves to us in this "Time?"
 
Last edited:
psychedout said:


Other dimensions do actually exist.

My Linear Algebra prof told me all about them.... really funky stuff.

Superstring Theory the 11 dimensions=The Bubble Universe!
 
Our reality is only what we are capable of measuring/comprehending with our limited senses/intelligence.I think there is so much undiscovered/unknown that one literally could not begin to fathom.
 
HUCKLEBERRY FINNaplex said:
Our reality is only what we are capable of measuring/comprehending with our limited senses/intelligence.I think there is so much undiscovered/unknown that one literally could not begin to fathom.

Yep! Does the Tree that fell in the woods really make a sound? Who knows what really exists even though mankind can not "See it as of yet!

Speaking of the Tree etc this is sort of funny!

If a tree falls in the middle of the woods, an no one is there to hear it, does it really make a sound?

Ass' view:

What tree? I didn't see any freaking tree? *hides axe behind back*
Seriously though, it depends. We could consider the idea that when the tree falls... it creates wind vibration. This vibration/energy created can travel for miles, and perhaps whisp accross another object far away. If someone were close by, they could possible hear it. But, what if the wind isn't strong enough... how big is the tree? if i were like.. right outside the woods when it fell in the woods... maybe i could hear it... ponder....


Butt's view:

Euh... Duh? Made a noise on Earth at that time, maybe not heard by people but still made a noise??

uNLeSs this UFO ship laser-cut the poor tree, and teleported it in the ground without the slightest noise (advanced technology... sigh) AND the tree experienced missing time... meaning that the technically, the tree "fell" but no one was there to see or hear it. *Insert X-Files theme*
 
Her is the married man's hypothosis...

If a married man has an opinion and his wife isn't there to hear it is he still wrong?

LOL!!!
 
HUCKLEBERRY FINNaplex said:
Our reality is only what we are capable of measuring/comprehending with our limited senses/intelligence.I think there is so much undiscovered/unknown that one literally could not begin to fathom.

My reality is reality, there is nothing beyond what my mind doesn't know.

Dcup,

The tree is a nice and very commonly used example. If I didn't see it (well "sence" it) fall, then it didn't fall. :)

-sk
 
Usually, the given mindset, calculates and sees what is most probable based on other calculations it has done. Most will conclude that the tree fell, at one time or another, based on past experiences (calculations, or however you define it).

Truth is, even if you see the tree falling it still doesn't say much according to the reality defined by society.

To make things simpler, this is how I see it:

Whatever I see, whatever I do, whatever I feel like is reality. I define my own reality.

I don't wonder about blackholes (and similar things like it), simple because, no mindset can even claim that they have "senced" it but instead they use a bunch of calculations to derive at the possibility of a black hole. I don't know about you guys but the margin of error seems way larger here than with the tree falling in the middle of the forest.

Either way, it doesn't matter. It doesn't change anything if a black hole exists or not. My reality is still my reality.

Most people go in an open grassy area with their girlfriends and look at the little stars and tell themselves, "look how small we are compared to the universe. Well I laugh at those people. Stupid sheeple as dcup calls them.

I don't exist in this pathetically accepted universe. The universe exists within my own mind.

That is all.

-sk
 
Interesting thread. When I unfuck myself over the next 2-3 days, I will hopefully look at this thread again and respond.
 
plornive said:
Interesting thread. When I unfuck myself over the next 2-3 days, I will hopefully look at this thread again and respond.

If you don't mind me asking, what's the girl's name in the pic?

-sk
 
If wormholes were to have the geometry that everyone portrays them as having, then they would have to have some field perpendicular to the normal gravity field, wouldn't they? A black hole would just suck in some object and crush it. A black hole joined to a white hole might suck in an object when the black hole collapses, and spit it out when the white hole uncollapses, but no time travel or faster than light would result from this, becuase the black hole's gravity points forward in time and the white-holes gravity backwards, not vice versa. You couldn't manage to get yourself sucked into the white-hole end of it to travel backwards, could you?
 
Why the hell did you end all those sentences with exclamation points?

You must be pretty damn excited about it.
 
SV2 said:
If wormholes were to have the geometry that everyone portrays them as having, then they would have to have some field perpendicular to the normal gravity field, wouldn't they? A black hole would just suck in some object and crush it. A black hole joined to a white hole might suck in an object when the black hole collapses, and spit it out when the white hole uncollapses, but no time travel or faster than light would result from this, becuase the black hole's gravity points forward in time and the white-holes gravity backwards, not vice versa. You couldn't manage to get yourself sucked into the white-hole end of it to travel backwards, could you?

The current theory does not even allow for the ultimate destination of a Worm Hole to be much of a worry because it is believed that passing through a Worm Hole is impossible! Instant death would be a near certainty given any imaginable method of protection, and no matter the circumstances return would be impossible given everything we know about Black Holes and the way they would interact with White Holes!

The only method where death would not be a near certainty is if a Worm Hole could somehow be stabilized for longer than the brief amount of time under which they are naturally believed to remain stable! This is an impossibility given our current understanding of science and would obviously be grander in scope than anything ever attempted by mankind in the "History" of Earth!

It is theoretically possible, although highly improbable that a worm hole could somehow be stabilized to allow safe passage through it! The only theoretical way this could be done that I was able to find involves using "Exotic Matter" or matter unlike any we know, Highly Exotic Matter! In order to stabilize the Worm Hole the throat of the singularity would have to be threaded with this matter which would be spherical in nature. The properties this matter would have to have would be negative mass, and yet still be capable of exerting a positive surface pressure!

It must have these two properties for very specific reasons the negative mass ensures the the throat of the Worm Hole lies outside the protected region and the positive surface pressure is the property that prevents the throat of the worm hole for collapsing!These properties of matter are not arbitrary or purely theoretical, It has been determined this is the type of Space Time geometry most likely needed to produce a stable Worm Hole!

Einstein's equations then specify what the energy momentum content of matter must be in an area to produce the needed geometry! From as general a standpoint as a matter such as this can be, these are the properties normally suggested to be needed to stabilize a worm hole! Anyways, the notion of negative mass matter is certainly rather disturbing however because of Vacuum Fluctuations near a Black Hole it is not considered to be an impossibility!
 
sk* said:


My reality is reality, there is nothing beyond what my mind doesn't know.
-sk

You are living in a VERY limited mindset if that is what you truly believe.Your mind only interprets/understands what it is ABLE to based on VERY limited biomechanisms.There is SO MUCH more within just an arms reach,dimensionally speaking,than you or I will ever be able to comprehend in this lifetime.
 
HUCKLEBERRY FINNaplex said:


You are living in a VERY limited mindset if that is what you truly believe.Your mind only interprets/understands what it is ABLE to based on VERY limited biomechanisms.There is SO MUCH more within just an arms reach,dimensionally speaking,than you or I will ever be able to comprehend in this lifetime.

Huck,

I'll interpret this better but look at the quote you have in your signature:

"Reality is merely an illusion,albeit a very persistent one."
-Albert Einstein

Think about it.

-sk
 
HUCKLEBERRY FINNaplex said:


You are living in a VERY limited mindset if that is what you truly believe.Your mind only interprets/understands what it is ABLE to based on VERY limited biomechanisms.There is SO MUCH more within just an arms reach,dimensionally speaking,than you or I will ever be able to comprehend in this lifetime.

Was on the phone, anyway ...

Limited mindset? No, I am living in a completely free mindset.

Let me explain ...

First of all, the dimensional argument is somewhat a joke to me as I percieve everything in a one dimensional state. For example time, time didn't begin whenever "god" or whoever else chose it to begin, but instead it begun with my first memory. Time never changed, time and dimension are this single dot of my "memories" or whatever I "know." Instead of looking at a timeline I look at a single dot.

Now this is how I see everything,

My mind -> Universe -> everything else including people and other planets (if you choose to "believe" in them)

As opposed to the mind of the average person,

Universe -> galaxies -> planets -> earth -> People -> Person X's Mind

-----

My reality is what I percieve, my reality is my illusion.
If I see, hear, smell, etc. something then it most likely exists. I don't try to make obscene calculations to figure out if a worm hole exists, because all a worm hole is is someone's idea of what the universe is all about. Looking from my point of view the universe is about my mind, weather a worm hole exists or not is such a small thing that isn't worth my "time" or effort to "calculate."

I've always had that statement in my signature, "insanity has its price" and what I mean by it is that only once you reach a true stage of insanity will you be completely free. Why? Because as long as you don't deviate from current society and as long as you aren't considered "insane" by what "society" percieves you than you are confined within society. Then you are just another dot.

Once you are able to isolate yourself to the point where your mind will seperate from your body, then you will become "god." God, with all its "powers." God with full control over the "universe" (being my mind).

See where I am going with this?

---

To me it sounds riddiculous when someone will say "there is so much more than what me or you can percieve." That statement alone shows how locked up within society you are. It shows that you limit your mind by believing that there is so much more out there.

-------------

Anyway, that's it for now ... I can elaborate further later on.

-sk
 
I wish I was as simple minded as you Sk,but unfortunately I am not arrogant enough to believe that everything I've interpreted up to this point is all that there is.I have seen and experienced things first hand that you,I,or anyone else could not possibly explain.You have much to learn my friend.You're still very young though,so perhaps you will open your mind and think outside the box one day.
 
sk* said:


Was on the phone, anyway ...

Limited mindset? No, I am living in a completely free mindset.

Let me explain ...

First of all, the dimensional argument is somewhat a joke to me as I percieve everything in a one dimensional state. For example time, time didn't begin whenever "god" or whoever else chose it to begin, but instead it begun with my first memory. Time never changed, time and dimension are this single dot of my "memories" or whatever I "know." Instead of looking at a timeline I look at a single dot.

Now this is how I see everything,

My mind -> Universe -> everything else including people and other planets (if you choose to "believe" in them)

As opposed to the mind of the average person,

Universe -> galaxies -> planets -> earth -> People -> Person X's Mind

-----

My reality is what I percieve, my reality is my illusion.
If I see, hear, smell, etc. something then it most likely exists. I don't try to make obscene calculations to figure out if a worm hole exists, because all a worm hole is is someone's idea of what the universe is all about. Looking from my point of view the universe is about my mind, weather a worm hole exists or not is such a small thing that isn't worth my "time" or effort to "calculate."

I've always had that statement in my signature, "insanity has its price" and what I mean by it is that only once you reach a true stage of insanity will you be completely free. Why? Because as long as you don't deviate from current society and as long as you aren't considered "insane" by what "society" percieves you than you are confined within society. Then you are just another dot.

Once you are able to isolate yourself to the point where your mind will seperate from your body, then you will become "god." God, with all its "powers." God with full control over the "universe" (being my mind).

See where I am going with this?

---

To me it sounds riddiculous when someone will say "there is so much more than what me or you can percieve." That statement alone shows how locked up within society you are. It shows that you limit your mind by believing that there is so much more out there.

-------------

Anyway, that's it for now ... I can elaborate further later on.

-sk
To me the major flaw in what you are saying is that if you try to understand the world you observe, you will generally not be able to explain all of its permutations without understanding it from another reference frame. If you really did separate your ideas from society and/or the vast world your thoughts would would be very limited and incomplete, even with respect to just your immediate surroundings. You don't know if the outside world affects you or not. In my observations (and I presume yours, too), it DOES.
 
Last edited:
Free Your mind and you can see the Bubble Universe clearly!
 
HUCKLEBERRY FINNaplex said:
I wish I was as simple minded as you Sk,but unfortunately I am not arrogant enough to believe that everything I've interpreted up to this point is all that there is.I have seen and experienced things first hand that you,I,or anyone else could not possibly explain.You have much to learn my friend.You're still very young though,so perhaps you will open your mind and think outside the box one day.

Now I hate this shit. Much respect to you on anabolics issues and everything else that goes on on the ana board, but you have no idea what you are talking about.

Don't patronize me, and age does not always define the person's "intellect."

Think outside of my box? For a great portion of my life I thought like you did, but apparently I changed my mind. So maybe you have to live outside of the "box."

This just tops off my day.

Later.

-sk
 
plornive said:
To me the major flaw in what you are saying is that if you try to understand the world you observe, you will generally not be able to explain all of its permutations without understanding it from another reference frame. If you really did separate your ideas from society and/or the vast world your thoughts would would be very limited and incomplete, even with respect to just your immediate surroundings. You don't know if the outside world affects you or not. In my observations (and I presume yours, too), it DOES.

The "outside world" only affects you if you let it exist.

Go think about that.

Later. Oh yea, there are no flaws in my statements.

-sk
 
sk* said:


Now I hate this shit. Much respect to you on anabolics issues and everything else that goes on on the ana board, but you have no idea what you are talking about.

Don't patronize me, and age does not always define the person's "intellect."

Think outside of my box? For a great portion of my life I thought like you did, but apparently I changed my mind. So maybe you have to live outside of the "box."

This just tops off my day.

Later.

-sk

Thank you for illustrating my entire point.You believe you know everything,and not you,or ANYONE does,or ever will.I get a good chuckle any time I hear someone make statements such as yours.A great deal of your life?You're like 21 bro.You have not lived life yet.
 
Dark Matter! Gotta love it!


"Behind physics is the more ancient and honorable tradition of attempts to understand where the world came from, where it is going, and why." -P. J. E. Peebles
 
Last edited:
HUCKLEBERRY FINNaplex said:


Thank you for illustrating my entire point.You believe you know everything,and not you,or ANYONE does,or ever will.I get a good chuckle any time I hear someone make statements such as yours.A great deal of your life?You're like 21 bro.You have not lived life yet.

No huck, I don't know "everything." HOWEVER, I have come up with my defenition of the "spark" of life.

I may not be as old as you, but you have to realize this kind of philosophy and computer programming is my passion. I have spent 7-8years in depression because I couldn't find the "meaning of life." I locked myself in isolation of all human contact just to come to this conclusion, but yet you feel like I am not old enough to give my opinion on the matter.

Fact is, age isn't relative to experience. I have interned in major cooperations as a programmer and I ended up doing more work than most anyone else at the desk. Why? Because programming was one of my passions and I simply knew more than everyone else. It was a passion just like the other things I have said on this thread.

There are a few things that will define me as a person and this is one of them. Until now, you have just patronized me without even slightly supporting your point of view.

-sk
 
sk* said:


The "outside world" only affects you if you let it exist.

Go think about that.

Later. Oh yea, there are no flaws in my statements.

-sk
This is no flame, but if someone wanted to, they could kill you and end your existence. That would affect you.

I understand that we start from different premises. You think of your existence as simply an experience alone. I see others affecting me. MAYBE they are just part of my experience. MAYBE not. I don't know. In fact, you don't know, in my opinion. In my opinion, your existence ignores the causal relationship of your existence. You believe you can control your experience. I say you probably cannot.

You do understand that with your philosophy, there is NO PURPOSE to debating anything with anyone other than your personal preference. You believe what you want, regardless of any semblance of correctness. People must argue from the same premise at some time, or it is pointless in a way.
 
Theres only 2 things I gotta say on this D, #1: It is very possible "BUSH" is an alien from another planet seeking to gather in, shall we say, this planets precious resources for their own demonic means. #2. We should just forget this bullshit, and watch Farscape and Star Trek and Star Wars-and just pretend we know what were talking about.
 
plornive said:
This is no flame, but if someone wanted to, they could kill you and end your existence. That would affect you.

I understand that we start from different premises. You think of your existence as simply an experience alone. I see others affecting me. MAYBE they are just part of my experience. MAYBE not. I don't know. In fact, you don't know, in my opinion. In my opinion, your existence ignores the causal relationship of your existence. You believe you can control your experience. I say you probably cannot.

You do understand that with your philosophy, there is NO PURPOSE to debating anything with anyone other than your personal preference. You believe what you want, regardless of any semblance of correctness. People must argue from the same premise at some time, or it is pointless in a way.

The death of my body won't end my thought. This wasn't the point of my argument anyway. If my thought ends, then so will everything else, including you [this is ofcourse according to me, so I don't want any childish arguments here from anyone].

Like I said before, my "philosophy" is best to define the spark of the universe. I find it useful to argue certain things for my own entertainment, and other things like "worm holes" to be useless.

-sk
 
DcupSheepNipples said:
Dark Matter! Gotta love it!


"Behind physics is the more ancient and honorable tradition of attempts to understand where the world came from, where it is going, and why." -P. J. E. Peebles

No fucking shit. I've been saying that, in not so many words, forever. Let's smoke dope!
 
sk* said:


The death of my body won't end my thought. This wasn't the point of my argument anyway. If my thought ends, then so will everything else, including you [this is ofcourse according to me, so I don't want any childish arguments here from anyone].

Like I said before, my "philosophy" is best to define the spark of the universe. I find it useful to argue certain things for my own entertainment, and other things like "worm holes" to be useless.

-sk
Since you are a programmer, you will probably agree that we must argue with the premise of logical consistency.

Now that we have that taken care of, do you aknowledge that you cannot prove that nothing can affect your thought? ... do you agree that it is possible you don't have complete control and that something could control you?

I agree that it is logical to look at things from our experience only. But, my experience only tells me that the world existed before me and there are things I can learn from that. It is the only consistent truth I can find in a world where everything I see is interconnected --- including me and you. I am affecting you right now.
 
plornive said:
Since you are a programmer, you will probably agree that we must argue with the premise of logical consistency.

Now that we have that taken care of, do you aknowledge that you cannot prove that nothing can affect your thought? ... do you agree that it is possible you don't have complete control and that something could control you?

I agree that it is logical to look at things from our experience only. But, my experience only tells me that the world existed before me and there are things I can learn from that. It is the only consistent truth I can find in a world where everything I see is interconnected --- including me and you. I am affecting you right now.

"Insanity has its price"

Only in complete insanity do you become completely unaffectable. I have asymptoted this stage. BTW, there are many aspects that will allow me not to be affected by you, which can't be explained by plain writing.

-sk
 
plornive said:
Since you are a programmer, you will probably agree that we must argue with the premise of logical consistency.

Now that we have that taken care of, do you aknowledge that you cannot prove that nothing can affect your thought? ... do you agree that it is possible you don't have complete control and that something could control you?

I agree that it is logical to look at things from our experience only. But, my experience only tells me that the world existed before me and there are things I can learn from that. It is the only consistent truth I can find in a world where everything I see is interconnected --- including me and you. I am affecting you right now.

I took pascal and c in college, and your on way to much dope. Any fucking moron in their right mind can concern 10000100010010100100100100100000011111111111111000010010001011111111111 from the origin of the universe.
 
sk* said:


"Insanity has its price"

Only in complete insanity do you become completely unaffectable. I have asymptoted this stage. BTW, there are many aspects that will allow me not to be affected by you, which can't be explained by plain writing.

-sk
You evidently cannot explain your ideas through reason. Sure, it's possible... but it should be obvious to you that no one will agree with something that aparently cannot even be shown to them. To them you are like a man telling them to believe in an entirely new religion that can only be understood through experience.

Basically, I think you might be foolish by thinking this way. Maybe some day your ideas will be proven wrong to you.
 
rsnoble said:


I took pascal and c in college, and your on way to much dope. Any fucking moron in their right mind can concern 10000100010010100100100100100000011111111111111000010010001011111111111 from the origin of the universe.
Wow, C and pascal.

What the fuck are you talking about?
 
plornive said:
You evidently cannot explain your ideas through reason. Sure, it's possible... but it should be obvious to you that no one will agree with something that aparently cannot even be shown to them. To them you are like a man telling them to believe in an entirely new religion that can only be understood through experience.

Basically, I think you might be foolish by thinking this way. Maybe some day your ideas will be proven wrong to you.

No, there are just techniques that I have developed through mind games. You can't comprehend them because you do not have the same background as me.

You can chose to omit that part of my last post if it will make you feel better, the rest of the post still answers your post.

-sk
 
There are a great many things that we don't know now, and probably never will know. And if you don't think it's fun to contemplate them, don't. If you like to explore, do it. Einstein is famous for exploring the unknown. Who would have thought that time behaves differently when you travel at the speed of light? Not me. In fact, I thought the whole relativity thing was a load of shit before I started reading about it.

Honestly, if you think you know everything, or you just choose to ignore the unknown, then I pity you. Our scope of knowledge is SO minute it is fucking rediculous...We know so little, and there is so much to know it boggles my mind.

Sk*, you remind me of Carl Everett...he doesn't even believe in dinosaurs because he's never "sensed" one.
 
sk* said:


No, there are just techniques that I have developed through mind games. You can't comprehend them because you do not have the same background as me.

You can chose to omit that part of my last post if it will make you feel better, the rest of the post still answers your post.

-sk
If someone were to tell you about a method developed through mind games that you could not possibly comprehend, would you believe him? Would it make sense to believe someone's claim with no evidence?

If not, then you see my point. You should expect people to not believe you.
 
plornive said:
Wow, C and pascal.

What the fuck are you talking about?

That was a long time ago asswipe, to your degrade Mr. vocab, I had 2.5 years of college and 5+ years of education for my previous vocation. You are so blinded.
 
plornive said:
If someone were to tell you about a method developed through mind games that you could not possibly comprehend, would you believe him? Would it make sense to believe someone's claim with no evidence?

If not, then you see my point. You should expect people to not believe you.

Okay, here goes, do your best to understand:

Most of the incoming data that I recieve is filtered and recycled, I only chose certain data inside that I believe are better for my cause. I have developed a method for doing this throughout the years.

Like I said, only in complete "insanity" I can reach this stage at its best ... I am close to it now but not where I used to be.

Bulldog, all I have to say is: :rolleyes:.

-sk
 
Bulldog_10 said:


You sure you're past that insanity phase you spoke of?:rolleyes:

Bulldog, your statements were redandant and already answered on my part. It is really ignorant and disrespectful to address them again.

-sk
 
sk* said:


Okay, here goes, do your best to understand:

Most of the incoming data that I recieve is filtered and recycled, I only chose certain data inside that I believe are better for my cause. I have developed a method for doing this throughout the years.

Like I said, only in complete "insanity" I can reach this stage at its best ... I am close to it now but not where I used to be.

Bulldog, all I have to say is: :rolleyes:.

-sk

You sure you're past that insanity phase you spoke of?:rolleyes:
 
rsnoble said:


That was a long time ago asswipe, to your degrade Mr. vocab, I had 2.5 years of college and 5+ years of education for my previous vocation. You are so blinded.
Again, my friend, what the fuck are you talking about?:p
 
sk* said:


Bulldog, your statements were redandant and already answered on my part. It is really ignorant and disrespectful to address them again.

-sk

My fault, I was probably filtering the data that entered my head too scrupulously.:)
 
plornive said:
Again, my friend, what the fuck are you talking about?:p

Ok asshole, let's make this short and sweet: I want to eat the pussy of the bitch posted on your av. If this is not acceptaple, pm me a price.
 
rsnoble said:


Ok asshole, let's make this short and sweet: I want to eat the pussy of the bitch posted on your av. If this is not acceptaple, pm me a price.
You remind me of a friend whom paid lots of money to lick the pussy of a young (think 12 or 13) "virgin" in thailand. I don't think you are willing to pay what it would cost you, so I wouldn't try if I were you.
 
Top Bottom