Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Women are so complicated
- Thread starter RADAR
- Start date
tinytank said:
He's 26.
Growth&Courage
New member
RADAR said:
Then perhaps you are the simplistic one.
I have figured women out.
They are unpredictable. lol
They are unpredictable. lol
fistfullofsteel
Well-known member
keep on telling ya guys, but does anybody listen
Will I see you tonight on a downtown train
Every night, every night it’s just the same
You leave me lonely
Will I see you tonight on a downtown train
All my dreams, all my dreams fall like rain
On a downtown train
Will I see you tonight on a downtown train
Every night, every night it’s just the same
Will I see you tonight on a downtown train
All my dreams, all my dreams fall like rain
On a downtown train
On a downtown train
All my dreams fall like rain
On a downtown train
Will I see you tonight on a downtown train
Every night, every night it’s just the same
You leave me lonely
Will I see you tonight on a downtown train
All my dreams, all my dreams fall like rain
On a downtown train
Will I see you tonight on a downtown train
Every night, every night it’s just the same
Will I see you tonight on a downtown train
All my dreams, all my dreams fall like rain
On a downtown train
On a downtown train
All my dreams fall like rain
On a downtown train
Last edited:
A
alien amp pharm
Guest
Yasmina had a good point, although I don't remember what she said now...
B
BrothaBill
Guest
RADAR said:
The question was raised: "If a man alone in the woods speaks, and his
wife cannot hear him, is he still wrong?"
I have considered this question in light of the principles of Modern
Physics and offer my thesis.
In the year 1900 Max Planck discovered that the energy of light is
quantified. In 1905 Albert Einstein used Planck's Constant to write the
theory of the Photoelectric Effect, that light behaves as a particle
when it comes to energy transfer. Louis de Broglie proposed that
particles can have a wave nature and this fact was later verified.
These discoveries led Neils Bohr to propose a radical theory of the
atom, which was partially successful in explaining the emission spectra
of the hydrogen atom. Neils Bohr was compelled to introduce the
Principle of "Complementarity," that light is both a particle and a
wave.
The modern theories were extended when Max Born showed that the
distribution of energy was a function of probability. Further, Warner
Heisenberg wrote the Principle of Uncertainty, which says that it is
impossible to determine the exact location of an electron and the vector
direction of its momentum at the same time.
This was followed with the master stroke penned by Erwin Schrodinger.
Using the "Psi function" of Quantum Mechanics, Schrodinger could map the
"wave field" of any particle, thus giving us a theoretical explanation
for the structure of an atom and the entire periodic table of the
elements.
The Quantum mechanics predicts that a wave of a single frequency would
stretch out to infinite proportions, the superposition of a narrow range
of frequencies produces a standing wave function which can be localized
to a much more precise location. Thus the electron and its position
within an atom becomes a cloud of probability.
From this I infer that there are such states as being right and being
wrong, within certain parameters of uncertainty. Applying the Psi
function, the more vague the statement of the man the greater the
probability of him being correct. The narrower and more specific his
utterance the greater the likelihood of his being wrong.Also, the Principle of Complementarity assures us that if a man alone in
the woods speaks, and his wife can not hear him, he is BOTH right and
wrong until he comes out of the woods.
In the analogy of Schrodinger's Cat, the cat in the box is both dead and
alive until someone opens the lid. The act of observing the phenomenon
determines the outcome.
Thus, the inevitable conclusion is that it doesn't matter what the man
says only his wife can determine whether or not he is correct.
edit, for those that arent familiar with The Schrodinger Cat in the Box Classic Thought Experiment:
Schrodinger's cat is a famous illustration of the principle in quantum theory of superposition, proposed by Erwin Schrödinger in 1935. Schrödinger's cat serves to demonstrate the apparent conflict between what quantum theory tells us is true about the nature and behavior of matter on the microscopic level and what we observe to be true about the nature and behavior of matter on the macroscopic level.
Here's Schrödinger's (theoretical) experiment: We place a living cat into a steel chamber, along with a device containing a vial of hydrocyanic acid. There is, in the chamber, a very small amount of a radioactive substance. If even a single atom of the substance decays during the test period, a relay mechanism will trip a hammer, which will, in turn, break the vial and kill the cat. The observer cannot know whether or not an atom of the substance has decayed, and consequently, cannot know whether the vial has been broken, the hydrocyanic acid released, and the cat killed. Since we cannot know, the cat is both dead and alive according to quantum law, in a superposition of states. It is only when we break open the box and learn the condition of the cat that the superposition is lost, and the cat becomes one or the other (dead or alive). This situation is sometimes called quantum indeterminacy or the observer's paradox: the observation or measurement itself affects an outcome, so that it can never be known what the outcome would have been if it were not observed.
We know that superposition actually occurs at the subatomic level, because there are observable effects of interference, in which a single particle is demonstrated to be in multiple locations simultaneously. What that fact implies about the nature of reality on the observable level (cats, for example, as opposed to electrons) is one of the stickiest areas of quantum physics. Schrödinger himself is rumored to have said, later in life, that he wished he had never met that cat
Last edited:
Hints? TELL US what you want! Don't hint.
See? I made my point, no hinting needed.
See? I made my point, no hinting needed.
A
alien amp pharm
Guest
SoKlueles said:
Didn't I tell you not to come out of the kitchen until those dishes were done?!!
wnt2bBeast
New member
RADAR said:
i stopped trying to figure them out
i just roll with the punches
If all women would just be like me the world would be perfect 
stfu alien
stfu alien
B
BrothaBill
Guest
Frisky said:If all women would just be like me the world would be perfect
stfu alien
I agree, I wonder what you think the world be like if all men were like me?
BrothaBill said:
Which one of you... You have so many different personalities.
What's so complicated. They're crazy.
If you walk into a mental health facility and some guy is jumping up and down on the table ranting about how someone is trying to invade his head no one asks whats wrong with that guy. You just know hes nuts.
And then you medicate him.
Instead with women we give them credit cards
WTF?
Im pretty sure its all a corportae conspiracy by the hair products and scented candle making industries
If you walk into a mental health facility and some guy is jumping up and down on the table ranting about how someone is trying to invade his head no one asks whats wrong with that guy. You just know hes nuts.
And then you medicate him.
Instead with women we give them credit cards
WTF?
Im pretty sure its all a corportae conspiracy by the hair products and scented candle making industries
B
BrothaBill
Guest
Frisky said:Which one of you... You have so many different personalities.
Just the BB one, I think Im fairly consistently insane but one single unitary spirit of having fun and hijinx. I dont take myself seriously whatsoever, thats all.
tinytank
New member
woman cant make up there mind, they want a guy tht will listen to them , but after a while they will get board with him, u want us to dress+act like ppl on t.v, but when we make a change like getting hair straightners, u call us GAY !!???u give us hints, tht no way r we going to understand. but when we tell u the offside rule in football(soccer) about 500 times u still dont understand. i tryed useing pictures, toys and even bought a dvd on the rules of football. but my brothers G/F still wont get it.
U CANT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!!!!!!!!!!!!
U CANT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!!!!!!!!!!!!
