Who's Fault Is It?????

[BIGnR$CH]

I was looking at a thread earlier when I came across a topic I think would start a great conversation. I won’t quote this exactly because honestly I don’t remember and am too lazy to go back and look but there was a comment made about a lost package in the mail and it being the responsibility of a "good" supplier or source to resend the package.

So my questions to everyone are as followed:

1. Is it the responsibility of the supplier to re-ship orders "lost" in the mail?

2. If the supplier should choose not to resend the order is this grounds for that supplier or source to be labeled as a scammer?

 

[SgtSlaughter]

bumpage ^^^^^

 

[boops]

hard to say bro you can argue both sides here.....just comes down to working with a source whom you trust and with solid resend policies if something like that happens.....good question although your gonna get different answers from both sides....

 

[danymal04]

I was looking at a thread earlier when I came across a topic I think would start a great conversation. I won’t quote this exactly because honestly I don’t remember and am too lazy to go back and look but there was a comment made about a lost package in the mail and it being the responsibility of a "good" supplier or source to resend the package.

So my questions to everyone are as followed:

1. Is it the responsibility of the supplier to re-ship orders "lost" in the mail?

2. If the supplier should choose not to resend the order is this grounds for that supplier or source to be labeled as a scammer?

I feel it is only fair if both parties are being truley honest that they even "shipped" the package.

 

[cswole]

I was looking at a thread earlier when I came across a topic I think would start a great conversation. I won’t quote this exactly because honestly I don’t remember and am too lazy to go back and look but there was a comment made about a lost package in the mail and it being the responsibility of a "good" supplier or source to resend the package.

So my questions to everyone are as followed:

1. Is it the responsibility of the supplier to re-ship orders "lost" in the mail?

2. If the supplier should choose not to resend the order is this grounds for that supplier or source to be labeled as a scammer?

Most of your good sources will re-ship lost orders. If you are trying to scam(not saying you, BIGnR$CH, just readers of this post in general) the source, be sure he will notice if you make a habit of this.

2) If it is a new source, they usually would be willing to do this more so than the established ones to keep a good name for themselves, but like I said any good source usually makes this a normal practice to keep good customers. I wouldn't go out and call them a scammer, but make note of it, and if you know any others using this same source, let them know and ask them if they have had the same situation. Sources do turn scammers from time to time, it's sad... but it happens.

 

[scout69]

Hard to say but alot of suppliers will let you no before hand if your package gets seized they'll send you a new package with the seizure letter...Now to there benefit if they dont say anything about it than your beat you took the risk..You need to fall before you walk you need to get beat before you get a good source.

 

[bigtravis]

i have to come out. o.k. if your source supplies tracking numbers with purchases. and there is absolute proof that it is lost in the mail. then yes. a good source will resend the original order. now. if you for some reason screwed up the name on the shipping info. and are not able to pick it up or anything of the sort. and the recorded order shows that thats the correct info. that you gave originally. this is if you end up having to go pick up. then no. a source should not have to resend the order . you should have everything in line before hand. tracking no. with delivery confermation helps every single time.

 

[BIGnR$CH]

I feel it is only fair if both parties are being truley honest that they even "shipped" the package.

Your supplier should have proof

 

[BIGnR$CH]

i have to come out. o.k. if your source supplies tracking numbers with purchases. and there is absolute proof that it is lost in the mail. then yes. a good source will resend the original order. now. if you for some reason screwed up the name on the shipping info. and are not able to pick it up or anything of the sort. and the recorded order shows that thats the correct info. that you gave originally. this is if you end up having to go pick up. then no. a source should not have to resend the order . you should have everything in line before hand. tracking no. with delivery confermation helps every single time.

Good point! Definitely make sure your supplier uses a DC #

 

[BIGnR$CH]

I think that a good supplier should re-ship orders lost in the mail especially if the supplier tracks the order via delivery confirmation number and can see that their customer has yet to receive their order. On the other hand I also think that sometimes people take this stuff for granted almost as if they were ordering from a large retail store. They tend to forget the true nature of the business at hand. While a true business man would (out of good business efforts) re-ship the order, there are mere "peddlers” out there that don’t and wont. Be smart and know your supplier!!

There has to be other comment out there or even past experiences that could keep others out of trouble!

 

[MTS]

i think it depends on how large the supplier is...if they can really afford to send another package to the person that has some misfortune or not. hey we all take risks and thats one of them we should deal with

 

[cswole]

BT, you know more than I about this, but...

Wouldn't Delivery Confirmation put the receiver at more of a risk? As sometimes when there is a bust, they will place an agent, or have surveilance on your regular postal delivery agent and have you sign for the item and hand it over to you, that way they have proof of you recieving the goods?

Whereas without DC you know you don't have to sign for anything at all. I mean I know there is the ol' return to sender thing, but.... still. I know it doesn't really put the sender at more risk, except for the possibility of a rat/computer records, but the reciever has less tools at his dispense for detection of a bust?

 

[PolfaJelfa]

You dont sign for DC bro.


"When I step foot to my locker and change my shoes for training, it's like turning on a switch. I become a creature, not a human. I look to tear apart anyone and everyone in my way to hugeness and I don't care how I do it. I can feel my heart start jumping and my body saying "Beat me into the ground like a red-headed step child, I want punishment.

I want to be a freak, a FREAK I TELL YOU!"


I LOVE THIS QUOTE OF ARNIES

 

[cswole]

Ahh ok, my fault then. Was thinking of the signature type of confirmation... nevermind then .. =).

 

[gettinripped]

BT, is that you bro???!!?? in the avatar?? damnnnn

i have to come out. o.k. if your source supplies tracking numbers with purchases. and there is absolute proof that it is lost in the mail. then yes. a good source will resend the original order. now. if you for some reason screwed up the name on the shipping info. and are not able to pick it up or anything of the sort. and the recorded order shows that thats the correct info. that you gave originally. this is if you end up having to go pick up. then no. a source should not have to resend the order . you should have everything in line before hand. tracking no. with delivery confermation helps every single time.

 

[bw1]

Most of your good sources will re-ship lost orders.

Nuff said...end of thread