Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES UGL OZ
Raptor Labs UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIES UGL OZUGFREAKRaptor LabsOxygenPharm

Who will give Iran the beat down?

Who will give Iran the beat down?

  • The UN

    Votes: 4 44.4%
  • NATO

    Votes: 1 11.1%
  • Israel

    Votes: 2 22.2%
  • The US

    Votes: 2 22.2%

  • Total voters
    9
Abe Froeman, the sausage king of Chicago
or
Cole Trickle, best damn Nascar driver ever
or
Chunk, the king of the truffle shuffle
or
Adam Bomb, the poster boy for the best thing to ever grace the earth, GPK's
 
Amazing how any time an Islamic nation rumbles about obtaining a nuclear device, various countries who already have nuclear devices throw a fit.
 
bluepeter said:
Amazing how any time an Islamic nation rumbles about obtaining a nuclear device, various countries who already have nuclear devices throw a fit.

Have you heard the anti-semite rhetoric coming from the Iranian president lately?
 
I said the UN based on this logic:
- The US can not engage them. We are spread too thin now.
- Israel could do it in a heart beat, but won't because they need peace with the Arab world.
- NATO? That would be a land war and Iran just might whip them. Iran has a big, well trained army thanks to us.

This leaves the UN coupled with EU, Russian and American economic pressure on Iran's government. The younger people are very internet savy and long for contact with the Western world. They are not Arabs and will rebel against their own government if squeezed.

Squeeze and wait.
 
I think many have become spoiled after the "ease" of "victory" in the IRAQ war. We do know Iran will be different, but do we know how much different? Are we prepared?

This is not a video game!

"Who will give Iran the beat down?" omg
 
bluepeter said:
Amazing how any time an Islamic nation rumbles about obtaining a nuclear device, various countries who already have nuclear devices throw a fit.

Not because they are an Islamic nation. Because they are a state sponsor of international terrorism. The govt has vowed to destroy Israel. It would be foolish to sit by and allow them to have a nuke.
 
Longhorn85 said:
Not because they are an Islamic nation. Because they are a state sponsor of international terrorism. The govt has vowed to destroy Israel. It would be foolish to sit by and allow them to have a nuke.

Perhaps not primarily because they are an Islamic nation but that's definitely one reason. Look at Pakistan and India. India tested a bomb and the US did nothing until Pakistan followed suit several weeks later. Then all of a sudden they slapped sanctions on both countries. :)
 
bluepeter said:
Perhaps not primarily because they are an Islamic nation but that's definitely one reason. Look at Pakistan and India. India tested a bomb and the US did nothing until Pakistan followed suit several weeks later. Then all of a sudden they slapped sanctions on both countries. :)


Could the difference here be that India and Pakistan have been at odds and escalating actions towards each other? Throw in nukes and all of a sudden their choice of weapons has a far bigger and reaching impact that is no longer contained to just their borders.


And as for the Iranian president... let us see, he has called for wiping Isreal off the map and said the holocaust was a 'myth'. Mmmmkay. And then his own ministers offer up some half assed 'it was taken out of context' statement. Yeah.


I would normally understand/support the muslim point of view, but Iran's president is a dipshit. They would garner far greater support for condemning Isreal's use of torture and camps which is quite hypocritical seeing as how they point back to the holocaust and the associated treatments.
 
mekannik said:
Could the difference here be that India and Pakistan have been at odds and escalating actions towards each other? Throw in nukes and all of a sudden their choice of weapons has a far bigger and reaching impact that is no longer contained to just their borders.

Possible but I'm a pessimist :)


mekannik said:
And as for the Iranian president... let us see, he has called for wiping Isreal off the map and said the holocaust was a 'myth'. Mmmmkay. And then his own ministers offer up some half assed 'it was taken out of context' statement. Yeah.


I would normally understand/support the muslim point of view, but Iran's president is a dipshit. They would garner far greater support for condemning Isreal's use of torture and camps which is quite hypocritical seeing as how they point back to the holocaust and the associated treatments.

Couldn't agree more.
 
I think the US should work behind the scenes to encourage the Israelis to take it out with air strikes like they did before. Israel has the most to lose. We'll just have their back when the shit hits the fan.
 
Testosterone boy said:
8 billion Muslims is a lot of people.

Life on planet earth will get a "beatdown" if diplomacy is not respected.

8 billion? Whose rectum you pull that number out of?
 
Last edited:
The total number of muslims in the world doesn't mean shit.

They aren't united, they all don't have the same beliefs either.
 
themselves. I hope that they tinker with a nuke and mess up. Blow themselves up

Whiskey
 
The problem with T-Boy's number is that there is an estimated 6.5B people on earth right now. If half of them are muslim (big if) that means 4.75B muslims live somewhere else than earth.
 
chewyxrage said:
The total number of muslims in the world doesn't mean shit.

They aren't united, they all don't have the same beliefs either.
I concur, that's like claiming all "Christians" are catholic...it's just one sect.
 
Top Bottom