Who has a better life: a guy or a chick?

[Warik]

A guy of course.

I mean think about it, he's a man. That should be enough right there. What do women have going for them?

She can't sit on her butt all day and do nothing. That only works in extreme situations (i.e. celebrity/very rich old geezer marriages). In the average marriage, the man is going to expect AT LEAST some dinner. Maybe a pair or two of clean underwear. Not that easy anymore.

Childbirth? jeez, no comment.

Menstration? Shoot me.

Multiple orgasms? I hear a lot of women never even have orgasms... others take forever to have one, etc. Not that complicated for men. It's good to be consistent.

Oh, and we're allowed to become members at Augusta Golf Course.

Being a man is clearly better. I'd hate to be a woman.

-Warik

 

[DUSTY]

I CAN'T REALLY SAY BUT I DO BELEIVE THAT IT'S THE GIRL WHO HAS IT ALL.

 

[WODIN]

Women have it better. Women always know when they are going to get laid....men never know when they are going to get laid.

 

[HansNZ]

A good-looking guy has a better time. There are far more good-looking girls around than guys because girls make an extra effort. Females are expected by society to be pretty, so for men, spunky status is an extra bonus rather than an expectation.

Hunky guys can sleep around heaps too and enjoy their looks whereas pretty girls have their "reputations" to protect.

In the gay world, a good looking man enjoys status and power second only to God.

 

[jwill3:16]

If they are both really good looking, then it's equal. They both have it as easy.

I agree...

 

[alien amp pharm]

Women have it better. Women always know when they are going to get laid....men never know when they are going to get laid.

lol, true true

 

[nice6pac]

wrong the answer is equal becuase the good looking women has a different inground set of values from which she bases her qualtiy of life versus the male menaing women think different so beign a good looking women could be considered by women as not that big of a deal tihnk of it this way if you were a chick you have a good assest, pussy now imageine if the chicks are the ones that wnated action sunddenly guys are liek even if i am ugly i can still get ass so being good lookding isn;t as imporitant do you understand the concept women value looks differently ten men some men think being ugly is manly so becuase of 2 different ways of rating qualtiy of ife cannot be said comaprative basically

its like comparing apples to oranges

 

[notpuff]

i think a better question who would be more popular /get more attention in a social sitation a hot girl or a 5'10 260 pound shredded bb

 

[Sinistar]

being neither a good looking guy or girl, all my opinions are conjecture.

id say that a good looking guy is better. talk about getting your ass kissed! women will eat your shit and like it. they may even get a possessive streak in them. they want to keep you. an average guy on the other hand, gets bounced. also, if your a good looking guy, your alot less likely to get cheated on, cause theres only so much farther they can go up.

good looking girls tend to be crazy, heartless or soulless. you hear it all the time on elite: women who work on there looks who hate being hit on. they have a wide independant streak, yet expect there guys to follow them around sniffing there ass, or even better, dont understand why guys get sick of there shit. oh, and the sense of entitlement! sadly, most are little more than high price hookers. youd think if anyone could fal in love, it would be a hot lady.

 

[HansNZ]

i think a better question who would be more popular /get more attention in a social sitation a hot girl or a 5'10 260 pound shredded bb

5"10? Don't you mean 6'2"?

A 5'10" 260lb guy would not be at all attractive to plenty of women. They'd think he looks like a freak.

A think a 6'2", 220lbs shredded guy would get far more attention.