First off- I am new here, so I just want everyone to know I don't believe in absolutes, there is always more to learn, though I do enjoy discussing ideas....
By the way CoolColJ, I hope I did not misquote you, but it is something I thought I recalled you saying in a past post....also I have much respect for your postings here and the progress I've seen you make on the boards...
As for the ratios for perspective- a 1.5 to 2.0 clean is a bigtime lift, most peope will never even get close to that..
I do agree that there is no way to determine how much someone might clean based on their squat.... they might have some natural inclination to the lift (though it is by no means a natural movement)
Also, I think Christian is not 100% correct....
****
When I first started olympic lifting I could full squat 405lbs, clean 250lbs and snatch 175lbs. Increasing my squat to 485lbs improved my snatch to 253lbs and my clean to 319lbs, a combined gain of 147lbs.
When I increased my squat to 575lbs I increased my snatch to 291lbs and my clean to 352lbs (I did clean 374lbs from the hang though) for a relatively similar gain in squatting strength I only improved my total by 71lbs, half the gains as with my previous squat improvement. So even in one individual the ratio between the squat and clean/snatch will vary during his career.
****
going on to say...
****
Basically saying that when you lack strength, improving it will yiled great power gains. But if you already have sufficient brute strength, adding even more won't add much power.
****
I can find nothing that I disagree with in either of his statments-
BUT, Christian does show significant gains in his clean and snatch with improvement in the squat, AND though the correlation is not linear-
This may be due to the fact that there are other factors which will also have an effect on total transfer of one lift to the other.... explosiveness, technique, catch height (thanks CCJ) among hundreds of other factors, which would take years to analyze and equipment no one has the time or money to develop, not to mention that if your technique at 30% resembles your technique at 98%, I think you are a damned good technical lifter.
Either way, I don't think either position in its absolute form is completely correct... I feel making generalizations generally make you wrong....
and Sofa is right, it really doesn't matter what the correlation is or if there is one at all in the end, what matters is how hard you are working and what you are doing to get better...