Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

What kind of test do you think floyd Landis was on?

big_boy_1 said:
Yes france its a very corrupt country, besides...

then cant stand champions, they love losers
worse yet if the champions are Americans

I cant think of his name but there was a leader of another country that passed away, but he went to france i believe to live his last days. France keeps medical records sealed, so no one really knows cause of death. Rumors it was AIDS. Does someone remember this leaders name?? So, yes the French are sneaky and corrupt in my opinion..
 
ItalianMuscle27 said:
I cant think of his name but there was a leader of another country that passed away, but he went to france i believe to live his last days. France keeps medical records sealed, so no one really knows cause of death. Rumors it was AIDS. Does someone remember this leaders name?? So, yes the French are sneaky and corrupt in my opinion..
Princess Diana death is another example.
and yes, her autopsy remains secret :worried:
 
Big O said:
Its obvious his masking agent didnt work...They tested it the first time it came back clean...they shelved it tested it again and came back positive...what is there not to believe....

Cycling is one of the dirtiest doping sports there ever was or is...If you cant acknowledge that then I'm afraid you dont know a fucking thing....

Yeah OK, whatever skippy!

BTW that depo provera you stole from your sister's purse is not a steroid
 
just to clarify landis did not test postive for anabolic steroids. His test to epitest ratio was unnaturally high. Unnaturally high does not mean that he was doping, though it is certainly a possibility.

cycling is very competitive and doping of various kinds is common, many of which are still virtually undetectable.

IMO whether you take your blood out then re-infuse it or you "sleep and train at altitude" using hyperbaric technology- its a form of assistance. But then someone who has better genetics is also getting a "leg up" (and they dont have to draw blood or sleep in a pressure pod or whatever else)--- just an observation.

if you have a better trainer with a better training method (thats unknown to others, perhaps because of advance MRI scanning that allows the design of a program specifically for your tendon length/tension ratio) but gives you a big advantage.. is that cheating? you have access to a tool that makes you "better" than others, a tool that you alone have.. is this the same as doping.. perhaps not... but its still an advantage thats not necessarily "natural"

just some random thoughts on the matter....
 
excuse my ignorance as im not into cycling or know much about it, but if he was going to pick an AS to use, why test?
 
macrophage69alpha said:
just to clarify landis did not test postive for anabolic steroids. His test to epitest ratio was unnaturally high. Unnaturally high does not mean that he was doping, though it is certainly a possibility.

cycling is very competitive and doping of various kinds is common, many of which are still virtually undetectable.

IMO whether you take your blood out then re-infuse it or you "sleep and train at altitude" using hyperbaric technology- its a form of assistance. But then someone who has better genetics is also getting a "leg up" (and they dont have to draw blood or sleep in a pressure pod or whatever else)--- just an observation.

if you have a better trainer with a better training method (thats unknown to others, perhaps because of advance MRI scanning that allows the design of a program specifically for your tendon length/tension ratio) but gives you a big advantage.. is that cheating? you have access to a tool that makes you "better" than others, a tool that you alone have.. is this the same as doping.. perhaps not... but its still an advantage thats not necessarily "natural"

just some random thoughts on the matter....

Mac, didn't all the articles say "synthetic testosterone" I thought that meant is was an anabolic or androgenic steroid. Shit, could've been Halodrol-50 !!!
 
Twoguns said:
Mac, didn't all the articles say "synthetic testosterone" I thought that meant is was an anabolic or androgenic steroid. Shit, could've been Halodrol-50 !!!


just goes to show that the authors of those articles did not even research. if he had tested postive for an anabolic steroid it would have been prominently listed. All the reports mention him "testing positive for synthetic testosterone"- in testing speak this mean test/epitest ratio. as their is no difference between testosterone (synthetic or natural).
 
macrophage69alpha said:
just goes to show that the authors of those articles did not even research. if he had tested postive for an anabolic steroid it would have been prominently listed. All the reports mention him "testing positive for synthetic testosterone"- in testing speak this mean test/epitest ratio. as their is no difference between testosterone (synthetic or natural).

Thanks for the clarification. Just further evidence of how the media spins everything.
 
Top Bottom