Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

What is your IQ? Everyone vote please!

  • Thread starter Thread starter SSAlexSS
  • Start date Start date

Your IQ is

  • <80

    Votes: 4 3.9%
  • 80-90

    Votes: 1 1.0%
  • 91-100

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 101-110

    Votes: 1 1.0%
  • 111-120

    Votes: 5 4.9%
  • 121-130

    Votes: 26 25.5%
  • 130+

    Votes: 65 63.7%

  • Total voters
    102
Status
Not open for further replies.
Bullit said:


For a guy with a 133 IQ u aren't that bright.
Maybe only those who scored high are reporting their numbers?
Maybe only those who were confident that they would score high even bothered to take the test?

The sample size in this thread is way too small to say that this threads average is EF's average.

I like you more every day.
 
According to MENSA I am in the range 155-165......but everybody knows tat tese tests are bullcrap. See I cant even type legibly.
 
Actually, if I remember right, IQ tests are really only of significance/"accurate" in younger people (under 15) and the test is based on age-matched comparisons. Also, remember the arguments re: gender and race biased testing.

If I recall the true references, below 100 is considered retarded/impaired, and >140 is considered genius?
 
thebabydoc said:
Actually, if I remember right, IQ tests are really only of significance/"accurate" in younger people (under 15) and the test is based on age-matched comparisons. Also, remember the arguments re: gender and race biased testing.

If I recall the true references, below 100 is considered retarded/impaired, and >140 is considered genius?

Ahhhhh.....141 here. :?)

What about you gramps...low 80's?

hehe.....

Fonz
 
I started taking the test but got annoyed with that Johnny likes 400 but not 300 question, he likes etc., etc.

What the hell kind of question is that?
 
thebabydoc said:
Actually, if I remember right, IQ tests are really only of significance/"accurate" in younger people (under 15) and the test is based on age-matched comparisons. Also, remember the arguments re: gender and race biased testing.

If I recall the true references, below 100 is considered retarded/impaired, and >140 is considered genius?

100 is the average I.Q. I think mentally impaired is around 80 and below. 140 and above is considered genius. With 1% or less of the population in that range.
 
I'm a genius? I am the perfect example to demonstrate why these tests are worthless.

biteme said:


100 is the average I.Q. I think mentally impaired is around 80 and below. 140 and above is considered genius. With 1% or less of the population in that range.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom