swole
Well-known member
Lestat said:I guess i didn't pick up the sarcasm in Swole's earlier posts..
we've seen pile ons that go the other way and the bookie makes out.. true, swole is correct, this is action like we've never seen before.. but its only going to get heavier..
think about it, we used to be 1000 and that was a LOT, now with limits up to 50,000 you will see K change hands in much larger amounts.. it will all balance out in the end..
and in the end, MORE action = better for you as a bookie.. especially being 1 of only 2 or 3 bookies.. you're gonna earn yourself an ipod as well.
Pile-ons: Bookies determine if the action gets heavier. Don't forget it is the bookie that sets the limit per each event. Try winning back your karma with a 1000 limit on each event. I would never do this since people would lose interest regardless, plus I'm not a dick like that.
Balancing out in the end: Thanks for assuming it will all be OK, Mr. Karma DarwinYinYangDaliLama of all that is green.
Bookie action: All I need is 5 people to place bets on an event and it counts toward the contest. It doesn't matter if the wagered karma adds up to 50 or 500,000; as long as 5 people placed at least 1 karma point on my event then it counts toward the contest. You people won't bet on 1000 k limit events, so I'm forced to create action with high-limits. Kinda like you need more coke to get high. Always needing more.
This whole fiasco has me recalling a famous quote.
"Don't judge people until you have walked a mile in their shoes."
In your case, sandals.
(quote has nothing to do with issue, I just wanted to use the word "sandals")