Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Walmart looting = Reparations for Blacks

spongebob said:
im willing to bet two months salary that you have made generalizations in your life. it may not be about a race, it may have been a good generalization but that really doesnt change the fact of why you made the generalizations, the concept is the same and that is that generalizations hold some truth.

i know thats hard for people to accept especially when dealing with sensitive issues.

Fair enough, let me qualify. I have never made a generalization ever about someone based upon their colour.
 
spongebob said:
it was a sarcastic reply to your reply to hatussin, your logic was that since he lived in a lilly white town and only had contact with several blacks and was 18 that he couldnt possibly have a valid arguement. so it reminded me of your rantings about illegal immigration in the US.

and remember i dont need to taste shit to know that it will taste horribly.

btw im just chatting here.

Apples and oranges. MY sarcastic post was pointing out rather succinctly that since Robert Jan had little experience or contact with the people he was generalizing, his point was moot.

What rantings about illegal immigration are you referring to? The only thread on that I can recall was BRR pwning DJ_UFO and the only comment I made was something along the lines of agreeing with BRR.
 
nycgirl said:
It is one thing to have a intelligent conversation about a controversial topic. Will some people get upset? Of course. That said, one does not have to be ignorant to be controversial.

if i had to descibe the importance of conversation i would graph it, with time on the left and agreeability on the bottom. id give it a positive slope maybe even a slight exponential curve up. dont know why i say that but there you go.
 
redguru said:
My sentiments exactly. Breaking into a store for food, water, propane, emrgency items can be rationalized. Grabbing a 35" HDTV cannot. Or a Marlin 30-30, for that matter? Why grab the guns, so you can prevent lawlessness?

Another person made a quote, "Well, WalMart's insured". Where do you think these companies get the money to pay insurance premiums? Insurance is going to go up, increasing overhead, increasing price point. By stealing a TV, the looters are screwing themselves by raising thier costs on consumables.

BTW, this looting isn't a racial issue, it's a decadence of society in crisis issue. Five bucks says a bunch of meth heads would be doing the same thing if this happened in Phoenix, Arizona.

Why grab a gun? Maybe to defend yourself, your family, and your property, those are a few good reasons. People have to defend themselves, calling 911 is not going to help much. As far as the racial makeup of the looters, I'm just sticking with the facts. Most of the looters are black, there are no images of large numbers of white people looting because the looters are mostly black. Get it? I'm sure that meth heads in Phoenix could loot with the best of them, but the current situation is in 'Orleans.
Disclaimer: I only have one black friend and I hate rap music with a passion. I have certain prejudices and racial views, and I do not change them to suit a certain audience. I shave my head, ride a Harley and have lots of tattoos. I am respectful to people, but I am not politically correct and never will be. Life can be cruel, get tough or die.
 
bluepeter said:
Horseshit. People stay because of bravado, machismo, because they don't have the resources to leave whatever. They do not stay expressly for the purpose that they MIGHT get a chance to loot. That's ridiculous and you know it :)

you are correct, those are reasons people stay. but what i said was fact, now its up to you on how to use that information. enough said, next topic.
 
bluepeter said:
Fair enough, let me qualify. I have never made a generalization ever about someone based upon their colour.

ok, then you agree generalizations hold some truth?

so that makes you a generalizer. ;)
 
bluepeter said:
Horseshit. People stay because of bravado, machismo, because they don't have the resources to leave whatever. They do not stay expressly for the purpose that they MIGHT get a chance to loot. That's ridiculous and you know it :)
You are so naive. You obviously don't know many hood rat brothas. Have you ever been to a Ghetto? I seriously doubt it. :evil:
 
Breeze said:
Disclaimer: I only have one black friend and I hate rap music with a passion. I have certain prejudices and racial views, and I do not change them to suit a certain audience. I shave my head, ride a Harley and have lots of tattoos. I am respectful to people, but I am not politically correct and never will be. Life can be cruel, get tough or die.

Quite possibly the best disclaimer ever.
 
spongebob said:
you are correct, those are reasons people stay. but what i said was fact, now its up to you on how to use that information. enough said, next topic.

So you agree that this thread was started on a horseshit premise then, thanks. I believe that's what I said about half a dozen times until you decided to start arguing for practice :)
 
Top Bottom