Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Tren E experiences question?

  • Thread starter Thread starter UA_Iron
  • Start date Start date
U

UA_Iron

Guest
How did they compare to the acetate? I'm trying to decide between the two - I know ed jabs get old quick.

500mg Tren E week versus 75mg Tren Ace ed is what it has come down too. Which would I see less sides with?
 
UA_Iron said:
How did they compare to the acetate? I'm trying to decide between the two - I know ed jabs get old quick.

500mg Tren E week versus 75mg Tren Ace ed is what it has come down too. Which would I see less sides with?

You'll see less sides from the tren enth because you'll have far less trenbolone in your system.
 
UA_Iron said:
How did they compare to the acetate? I'm trying to decide between the two - I know ed jabs get old quick.

500mg Tren E week versus 75mg Tren Ace ed is what it has come down too. Which would I see less sides with?

I haven't run ace so I can't compare. I started at 250mg/w for about 5 weeks until I started to get gyno symptoms, then I dropped it and kept going with the other stuff I was running. Strength gains were great and a few weeks after pct (right now) I haven't gotten much weeker. The only sides I had were lethargy and obviously gyno.
 
thanks for the input guys

I think I'm gonna give the tren E a run and see
 
used2juice said:
You'll see less sides from the tren enth because you'll have far less trenbolone in your system.

Sorry I have to disagree, having run both tren e and a many times.The problem with tren e is that the sides are with you for weeks because of the long ester,therefore an unexperenced tren user should run tren a the first time then if the sides becaome too much they will dissapear within a day or two after last injection.

All IMHO DYOR etc etc
 
The Tren E will actually reach a peak around 1180mg in your system as shown by this graph - granted the days may be wrong, but the peaks are right.
dp729f.jpg


I've dabbled with tren A for around 3 weeks at 75mg/day but my workload became too much and it was kind of making me a psychopath (I got verbally hostile with one of my professors). Just wondering if Tren E might have a different effect as far as mood - I have a lot of time off so its sides wont be a problem.

If I have some time monday I'll put up Tren A accumulation in excel so we can compare.
 
Just finishing up a cycle which includes 300mg Tren E wk (100mg EOD). The stuff is fantastic you wont be dissappointed!!! I had absolutely no sides whatsoever and a dramatic improvement in body composition. I HIGHLY recommend it!
 
XTRALARG said:
Sorry I have to disagree, having run both tren e and a many times.The problem with tren e is that the sides are with you for weeks because of the long ester,therefore an unexperenced tren user should run tren a the first time then if the sides becaome too much they will dissapear within a day or two after last injection.

All IMHO DYOR etc etc

I agree with you completely, but the question wasn't "how long will the tren sides be with me," the question was "which will give me more negative side effects." :) And, in my mind, simple logic says that more active hormone will give you more side effects. Including ester weight, you will get a fair bit more active trenbolone with his dose of tren acetate then he would with his suggested dose of tren enth.

Again though, I DO agree wholeheartedly that if you've never used tren before, tren acetate may be the way to go because you can discontinue with the dosing and get rid of the sides should you find any of them unbearable.
 
used2juice said:
You'll see less sides from the tren enth because you'll have far less trenbolone in your system.
I don't think this is true at all. I only have anecdotal evidence from my own personal experiences but what I find is that short esters that are taken daily keep the hormone levels much more consistent than once a week shots from a long acting ester. That more consistent level of the compound for me at least has given noticable less sides.
 
bluetwistedsteel67 said:
I don't think this is true at all. I only have anecdotal evidence from my own personal experiences but what I find is that short esters that are taken daily keep the hormone levels much more consistent than once a week shots from a long acting ester. That more consistent level of the compound for me at least has given noticable less sides.

Again, true. But, again, I didn't see him post anything about single weekly injections. Assuming he was sticking twice weekly, I believe he would keep up comfortably stable levels of hormone...which brings me right back to the original premise that--assuming all else is equal--you will get more side effects from more active hormone in your body. :)
 
Top Bottom