Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
p0ink
New member
"TAKING THE VEIL" IN FLORIDA --The Quran Versus The Constitution
by Denis Schulz
The Iconoclast
The American Civil Liberties Union (the ACLU) has done its best to stamp out every last trace of religious expression it can find in the United States. For example, if a schoolmarm in West Podunk should flounce into a classroom with a miniature crucifix attached to her blouse, the local inquisitor from the ACLU would be the first to know, the first to respond, and the last to stop whining.
How dare Miss Frumpf impose her religious beliefs on those innocent five-and-six year olds? Does she know what an effect it will have on them? Does she want to scar them for life? Is she so lacking in sensitivity that she actually believes her religion is superior to someone else's -- say to Hugh Hefner's or to Osama bin Laden's? She might as well wear a neon sign that flashes on and off and says, "I am a Christian!" Why everybody knows religion is only a matter of opinion. Certainly, the ACLU does.
And what of poor little Habib in the back row -- exposed to a foreign culture -- what effect would it have on him? Will he run home, get down on his prayer rug, and pray to Allah for guidance? Will his parents enlist Insane Rubbish, Ibrahim Hoopercrit, and the ACLU to make Miss Frumpf pay for her insensitivity?
Certainly, if little Herkimer, a born again Christian, brought a Bible to the office, laid it on his desk, and someone saw it, he would be in big trouble. But if he came dressed as Queen Latifah with a dildo strapped to his head, the ACLU would defend him. Cross-dressing is in.
However, if someone complained about his outfit, they would be told to "get over it." So what if his seams were crooked.
If Herkimer should mention the Ten Commandments around the water cooler, he would be guilty of public proselytizing. But if he sprinkled his conversation with as many variants of the F-word as he could think of, the ACLU would find that acceptable.
Creches are only okay if they cannot be seen from high buildings with a ten-power telescope. However, when it comes to the indoctrination of non-Muslim children into the mysteries of Islam, the ACLU has been strangely silent. What's wrong with 3rd graders studying Islam and planning pilgrimages to Mecca as part of a class project? Who could possibly be against something like that? George Washington? Tom Paine? What did they know about cultural diversity and inclusiveness?
So it should come as no surprise that the ACLU was defending Sultanna Freeman, the Muslim woman who refused to have her face photographed for her driver's license because this procedure allegedly violated her religious rights. "I don't unveil," said Freeman, "because it would be disobeying my Lord."
The state of Florida says it's a matter of public safety. Some of the most ugly women in all of Florida have had their faces photographed for their driver's licenses -- Lena the Hyena and Nightmare Alice, for instance -- and there's been little uproar. The ladies have accepted this violation of their privacy as if it were a patriotic duty. Why can't Muslims be as patriotic as Christians, Jews, ugly women, and atheists?
Even the Invisible Man, Ole Claude Rains, had a picture taken for his driver's license. Count Dracula, who cannot be photographed because his image casts no reflection, was kind enough to provide the license bureau with a hand-drawn likeness of his grim phiz. Zorro and the Lone Ranger had pictures taken for their driver's licenses -- that's why they're no longer in the crime-fighting business. Do Muslims take this War on Terrorism seriously?
"This is about religious liberty," insisted Howard Marks of the ACLU. "It's about whether this country is going to have religious diversity."
No, it isn't! It's about driving a car!
It's about getting behind the wheel and tooling down the street to Big Mac's for a burger or to K-mart for a bargain. No one has an absolute right to drive a machine of any kind. One can walk; one can fly; one can take a bus or a taxi; one can mooch a ride. There's no right in the Constitution to drive a car. And there's no right in the Bible or the Quran either. The Holy Books are silent on automobiles. The prophets were not so prophetic.
Florida's drivers license flap was just another attempt by radical Islam to subvert the laws of the United States -- to make America bend to the will of the Mad Mullahs. Sultanna Freeman and her running dogs at the ACLU are no more interested in religious diversity than Hitler was in creating a homeland for the Jews.
And there is also the matter of public safety. Quite frankly, Old Dobbin, with or without his blinders, and Mr. Magoo, too, could see better out of the corners of their eyes than Sultanna can see through a veil.
by Denis Schulz
The Iconoclast
The American Civil Liberties Union (the ACLU) has done its best to stamp out every last trace of religious expression it can find in the United States. For example, if a schoolmarm in West Podunk should flounce into a classroom with a miniature crucifix attached to her blouse, the local inquisitor from the ACLU would be the first to know, the first to respond, and the last to stop whining.
How dare Miss Frumpf impose her religious beliefs on those innocent five-and-six year olds? Does she know what an effect it will have on them? Does she want to scar them for life? Is she so lacking in sensitivity that she actually believes her religion is superior to someone else's -- say to Hugh Hefner's or to Osama bin Laden's? She might as well wear a neon sign that flashes on and off and says, "I am a Christian!" Why everybody knows religion is only a matter of opinion. Certainly, the ACLU does.
And what of poor little Habib in the back row -- exposed to a foreign culture -- what effect would it have on him? Will he run home, get down on his prayer rug, and pray to Allah for guidance? Will his parents enlist Insane Rubbish, Ibrahim Hoopercrit, and the ACLU to make Miss Frumpf pay for her insensitivity?
Certainly, if little Herkimer, a born again Christian, brought a Bible to the office, laid it on his desk, and someone saw it, he would be in big trouble. But if he came dressed as Queen Latifah with a dildo strapped to his head, the ACLU would defend him. Cross-dressing is in.
However, if someone complained about his outfit, they would be told to "get over it." So what if his seams were crooked.
If Herkimer should mention the Ten Commandments around the water cooler, he would be guilty of public proselytizing. But if he sprinkled his conversation with as many variants of the F-word as he could think of, the ACLU would find that acceptable.
Creches are only okay if they cannot be seen from high buildings with a ten-power telescope. However, when it comes to the indoctrination of non-Muslim children into the mysteries of Islam, the ACLU has been strangely silent. What's wrong with 3rd graders studying Islam and planning pilgrimages to Mecca as part of a class project? Who could possibly be against something like that? George Washington? Tom Paine? What did they know about cultural diversity and inclusiveness?
So it should come as no surprise that the ACLU was defending Sultanna Freeman, the Muslim woman who refused to have her face photographed for her driver's license because this procedure allegedly violated her religious rights. "I don't unveil," said Freeman, "because it would be disobeying my Lord."
The state of Florida says it's a matter of public safety. Some of the most ugly women in all of Florida have had their faces photographed for their driver's licenses -- Lena the Hyena and Nightmare Alice, for instance -- and there's been little uproar. The ladies have accepted this violation of their privacy as if it were a patriotic duty. Why can't Muslims be as patriotic as Christians, Jews, ugly women, and atheists?
Even the Invisible Man, Ole Claude Rains, had a picture taken for his driver's license. Count Dracula, who cannot be photographed because his image casts no reflection, was kind enough to provide the license bureau with a hand-drawn likeness of his grim phiz. Zorro and the Lone Ranger had pictures taken for their driver's licenses -- that's why they're no longer in the crime-fighting business. Do Muslims take this War on Terrorism seriously?
"This is about religious liberty," insisted Howard Marks of the ACLU. "It's about whether this country is going to have religious diversity."
No, it isn't! It's about driving a car!
It's about getting behind the wheel and tooling down the street to Big Mac's for a burger or to K-mart for a bargain. No one has an absolute right to drive a machine of any kind. One can walk; one can fly; one can take a bus or a taxi; one can mooch a ride. There's no right in the Constitution to drive a car. And there's no right in the Bible or the Quran either. The Holy Books are silent on automobiles. The prophets were not so prophetic.
Florida's drivers license flap was just another attempt by radical Islam to subvert the laws of the United States -- to make America bend to the will of the Mad Mullahs. Sultanna Freeman and her running dogs at the ACLU are no more interested in religious diversity than Hitler was in creating a homeland for the Jews.
And there is also the matter of public safety. Quite frankly, Old Dobbin, with or without his blinders, and Mr. Magoo, too, could see better out of the corners of their eyes than Sultanna can see through a veil.
