Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
J
Juice Authority
Guest
There has been a lot of back and forth on this issue. The threory is that 10mg of D-bol taken at once will increase your average testosterone level by 5 times and decrease your endogeneous cosrtisone by 50-70%.
http://www.fitnessgeared.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=7513&perpage=35&pagenumber=1
Posted by Fonz,"The reason why dianabol is a good choice for a bridge is that its VERY anti-catabolic. It also dopaminergic. Giving you the benefits of increased CNS strength modulation by its androgenic mode of action. Androgens, in case you don know, increase neuro-muscular function, thus STRENGTH".
Fonz: "The body will be partially fooled. It will not entirely detect the increased levels of testosterone (above the normal test sipke), thus LH function WILL REMAIN only partially(Very little actually) suppressed.
In other words, he is "piggy-backing" an extra dose of testosterone on top of the endogeneously reduced one,
thus creating an "inflated" test spike".
Fonz:"The bridge is for 2 purposes:
1. To go from one cycle to the next letting your body recover from super-physiological levels of AAS. Your HPTA will partially recover too, but since you're going to start another cycle this is un-important. But at least its a semi-break. And little/no muscle loss will occurr.
In contrast to this notion Big Cat has the following to say,"When levels are supressed and you introduce an HPTA blocking factor of any kind, higher than normal physiological levels (achieved with Dbol on less than 5mg) you will keep levels supressed, if you perchance don't supress them even more. Only when levels of estrogen and androgen binding are significantly low (on both counts) will levels return to normal due to cessation of negative feedback".
Big Cat seems to reference studies and science that indicates this is a myth yet Fonz and others who have actually done this claim the opposite. For those of you who have actually done a D-bol bridge, what were the results? Was it worth it?
http://www.fitnessgeared.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=7513&perpage=35&pagenumber=1
Posted by Fonz,"The reason why dianabol is a good choice for a bridge is that its VERY anti-catabolic. It also dopaminergic. Giving you the benefits of increased CNS strength modulation by its androgenic mode of action. Androgens, in case you don know, increase neuro-muscular function, thus STRENGTH".
Fonz: "The body will be partially fooled. It will not entirely detect the increased levels of testosterone (above the normal test sipke), thus LH function WILL REMAIN only partially(Very little actually) suppressed.
In other words, he is "piggy-backing" an extra dose of testosterone on top of the endogeneously reduced one,
thus creating an "inflated" test spike".
Fonz:"The bridge is for 2 purposes:
1. To go from one cycle to the next letting your body recover from super-physiological levels of AAS. Your HPTA will partially recover too, but since you're going to start another cycle this is un-important. But at least its a semi-break. And little/no muscle loss will occurr.
In contrast to this notion Big Cat has the following to say,"When levels are supressed and you introduce an HPTA blocking factor of any kind, higher than normal physiological levels (achieved with Dbol on less than 5mg) you will keep levels supressed, if you perchance don't supress them even more. Only when levels of estrogen and androgen binding are significantly low (on both counts) will levels return to normal due to cessation of negative feedback".
Big Cat seems to reference studies and science that indicates this is a myth yet Fonz and others who have actually done this claim the opposite. For those of you who have actually done a D-bol bridge, what were the results? Was it worth it?
