The best Dan Brown book is..........

[Testosterone boy]

Which one of these books did you cultured folk like the best?

 

[Dante Alighieri]

I'm more of a Nelson DeMille fan, though I found Brown's The Da Vinci Code a decent read, but I've forgotten most of it now seeing as Cussler's Dirk Pitt novels have me enthralled once again.

 

[Testosterone boy]

Angels and Demons was the best one.


Cusslers novels are great fun....I have read them all.

 

[Testosterone boy]

The Da VInci Code was excellent.

But did the voters read Angels and Demons? It was even more thrilling. I absolutely lost two days of my life....could not put it down.

 

[MattTheSkywalker]

did not read deception point - digital fortress is pretty solid though, except for his extreme license-taking creating an attractive PhD mathematician.

 

[Testosterone boy]

did not read deception point - digital fortress is pretty solid though, except for his extreme license-taking creating an attractive PhD mathematician.

Yea.....especially when he made her full breasted. That was just too much.


All of his heroines are beauties with brains while the bloke is just smarter than shit. Interesting twist.

 

[Testosterone boy]

did not read deception point - digital fortress is pretty solid though, except for his extreme license-taking creating an attractive PhD mathematician.

I'd say that was the third best but the second most interesting.

Hard to believe it was written in 1998 with all of the talk of stopping terrorism and government agencies reading emails etc.

 

[B0ARDIN087]

i read deception point and angels and demons both in 1 sitting each, but i aws in a car on the way to hilton head for decpetion and on the way back for angels and demons. im not sure which was better....... angels didn't develop the main characters well enough however he really did an exceptionaly job and developing everyone else. i enjoyed them both and will be reading hte da vinci code once i find a paperback version


btw best thriller boook i have read is dean koontz- lightning

 

[Testosterone boy]

i read deception point and angels and demons both in 1 sitting each, but i aws in a car on the way to hilton head for decpetion and on the way back for angels and demons. im not sure which was better....... angels didn't develop the main characters well enough however he really did an exceptionaly job and developing everyone else. i enjoyed them both and will be reading hte da vinci code once i find a paperback version


btw best thriller boook i have read is dean koontz- lightning

Oh boy.....another guy bragging about reading a book non-stop and finding faults.


Akin to bragging about speed sex in my book.


Anybody can read fast. Why?


BTW...my comprehension in junior high was best at the highest speed the machine could go, I forgot the exact rate (it was over 1000wpm though). Never figured out a reason to read fast though. The whole idea is to enjoy the time spent.

 

[B0ARDIN087]

Oh boy.....another guy bragging about reading a book non-stop and finding faults.


Akin to bragging about speed sex in my book.


Anybody can read fast. Why?


BTW...my comprehension in junior high was best at the highest speed the machine could go, I forgot the exact rate (it was over 1000wpm though). Never figured out a reason to read fast though. The whole idea is to enjoy the time spent.

i was complementing the book not myself

 

[Testosterone boy]

i read deception point and angels and demons both in 1 sitting each, but i aws in a car on the way to hilton head for decpetion and on the way back for angels and demons.

angels didn't develop the main characters well enough


/QUOTE]ok

 

[B0ARDIN087]

i read deception point and angels and demons both in 1 sitting each, but i aws in a car on the way to hilton head for decpetion and on the way back for angels and demons.

angels didn't develop the main characters well enough


/QUOTE]ok

ya thats right, i thoght it was a style thing, i would have liked robert to be developed more, they were great books some of the best i have read in a long tmie. that doesn't mean i cant have an opinion that about smoething in the book that isn't completely positive?