Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

the ACLU's next defendant? the KKK...

mekannik

New member
KKK claims bias keeps its name from project
Bricks at Heritage Center in Clark won’t carry name of group

By Shawn Ankrom
Cox News Service

SPRINGFIELD | The Ku Klux Klan is claiming discrimination because bricks bearing its name won't line the way to the Heritage Center of Clark County.

Local masonry manufacturer and supplier Bryce Hill, Inc., won't engrave the bricks with the KKK name, bricks intended to be displayed alongside more than 1,200 others purchased by residents to raise money for the center. People can buy a brick engraved with their name or the name of a loved one for $100.

The Klan requested the first brick in August when a man walked in and filled out a form requesting the inscription "Mystic Knights of the Ku Klux Klan," said Roger Sherrock, Heritage Center operations director. He paid cash, Sherrock said, and walked out without leaving an address or phone number.

"When I realized what we had, I thought, ‘Let's make sure we're doing the right thing here,’ " Sherrock said. "No brick goes down until that (confirmation) form comes back."

Sherrock discussed the request with attorneys, then rejected the brick order. So, the KKK ordered 100 bricks directly through Bryce Hill, which has been doing the work for the museum. But Bryce Hill didn't fill the order either.

Bryce Hill manager Kent Sherry wouldn't comment on the order. The company's owner could not be reached Friday for comment.

Doug R. Walker, imperial wizard of the Dayton-based Mystic Knights of the KKK, filed a complaint this month to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission. It claimed, in part, that the Klan placed an order with Bryce Hill, which did make one brick.

"We were then told that they could not make anymore (sic) bricks for our order because we were the Ku Klux Klan!" the letter states. "They returned our check with a letter stating that they have decided not to except (sic) our business! We feel that this is nothing but discrimination against a legal White Christian fraternity!"

G. Michael Payton, executive director of the Ohio Civil Rights Commission, said the commission would not take up the Klan's cause because the Ohio Civil Rights Act does not prohibit discrimination by private entities because of political or societal beliefs.

"A fair interpretation of (Bryce Hill's) refusal indicated that service was not provided to the KKK because of its political/societal beliefs," Payton wrote to Walker. "We presume the KKK still advocates hatred against minorities and Jews, among other things."

Payton, who is black, was taken aback by Walker's letter.

"If there is anything good about this story, it's Bryce Hill," he said. "Sometimes we have to have principles. Bryce Hill is the hero here. That's an honorable thing for them to do. That reflects well on the Springfield community."

This isn't the first time the Heritage Center has dealt with KKK controversy. A historical display prepared for the museum's opening in March 2001 contained a reference to the Klan and racial tension in Springfield. That display, including a mannequin in a Klan robe, was changed after museum supporters complained it was too graphic.

"Obviously, we don't want to be associated with groups like (the Ku Klux Klan)," said Bill Swaim, Clark County Historical Society board president and publisher of the Springfield News-Sun. “To think of them being memorialized with a brick . . . no, we're not interested."

Sherrock just wants to return the $100 to the man who made the original request. But the man can't be reached at phone numbers he left for return calls.

http://www.activedayton.com/ddn/local/0330klan.html
 
Though you and I may not agree with what they have to say, they still have the right to say it.....

This is what the ACLU is all about... Like it or not.

If you want to lose your freedom of speech, I can give you several choices of other countries to move to..
 
if the aclu takes the case they will contradict themselves.

they defend civil rights and oppose racism, yet if they defend the kkk then they defend racism and bigotry. wonder what ryan has to say about this. personally i hope they don't take the case, i really do dispise the kkk. they give the confederate flag a bad name but more importantly they give the south a bad rep too.
 
What makes you think the ACLU will defend this? The goal of the ACLU is to push forth the liberal agenda and curb the people's freedom of speech. I don't agree with what the KKK has to say, but we're worse than them if we forbid them to say it.

-Warik
 
Warik said:
What makes you think the ACLU will defend this? The goal of the ACLU is to push forth the liberal agenda and curb the people's freedom of speech. I don't agree with what the KKK has to say, but we're worse than them if we forbid them to say it.

-Warik

You bet your ass!!!

If they do not take the case it will give the KKK a reason to march and may attract more attention to themselves.

do we want to see them in the news again...???
 
Prometheus said:
that deserves a second reading.

Please note that I'm referring to the KKK of today that only SAYS stupid shit, not the KKK of yesterday that actually DID stupid shit.

I think that forbidding someone to say stupid shit is worse than actually saying the stupid shit. What right does anyone have to say "you can't say that."

-Warik
 
dballer said:


You bet your ass!!!

If they do not take the case it will give the KKK a reason to march and may attract more attention to themselves.

do we want to see them in the news again...???

agree, otherwise its like giving them fuel. Thats what they're asking for.
 
I think if the aclu did defend these pricks, it would be on the principle that an "organization" could not be represented for making contributions to a museum and have the thanks other groups receive.

i dont know, some people I know would be just as offended to see a "Holy Gospel Church of Springfield" brick up there as a KKK brick. its like, if we open the door for some, it should be open for all. I know its not like that in real life, but thats what I always thought freedom and liberty meant to this country. my guess is thats what the aclu would be thinking if they took this case...
 
Top Bottom