Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

That Pesky Constitution blocking the Christo-Fascist...tsk...tsk...

WODIN

बुद्धकर&
Platinum
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7834478/

Judge strikes down Nebraska gay marriage ban
Ruling says measure interferes with rights of gays, others

WASHINGTON - In the first time that a federal judge has struck down a state constitutional provision limiting marriage to heterosexual couples, U.S. District Judge Joseph Bataillon on Thursday declared void a provision of the Nebraska constitution that defined marriage as only between a man and a woman and that banned same-sex civil unions, domestic partnerships and other similar relationships.

Bataillon declared in his ruling that under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Nebraska cannot ban same-sex marriages and civil unions.

The ruling may call into question similar provisions in other states’ constitutions.

Nebraska voters enacted the provision five years ago, with 70 percent approving it.

Will rekindle debate in Congress
The ruling is sure to rekindle debate in Congress over judicial power and may re-energize the forces backing an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to limit marriage to man-woman couples.

In a statement, Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning said the state would appeal Bataillon’s ruling.

“Seventy percent of Nebraskans voted for the amendment to define marriage as a union between one man and one woman, and I believe that the citizens of this state have a right to structure their constitution as they see fit,” Bruning said.

Bataillon, who was nominated to the federal bench by President Clinton in 1997 and unanimously confirmed by the Senate, based his ruling on two Supreme Court decisions, Romer v. Evans in 1996 and Lawrence v. Texas in 2003, with the majority opinion in both written by Justice Anthony Kennedy.
 
bluepeter said:
The wisdom of the founding fathers keeps tripping these fuckers up doesn't it?
Good stuff I tell ya. It'll block Rove's mid-term election strategy now since these initiatives are now considered unconstitutional.
 
People should be allowed to spend their lies with whomever they want, and making an official declaration of that endorsed by government is their right.

It's just not marriage. "Gay marriage" is like saying "cat dog".

People are asking to change the language. Bizarre.


Hey WODIN - I just got a dog.

Yeah, Matt I noticed. I like his whiskers.

WTF? Why is this even a court / legal issue?
 
MattTheSkywalker said:
People should be allowed to spend their lies with whomever they want, and making an official declaration of that endorsed by government is their right.

It's just not marriage. "Gay marriage" is like saying "cat dog".

People are asking to change the language. Bizarre.


Hey WODIN - I just got a dog.

Yeah, Matt I noticed. I like his whiskers.

WTF? Why is this even a court / legal issue?
It's a legal issue because the Right made it one. You remember those state ballot initiatives from the Presidential Election that banned Gay Marriage or made marriage a union of only a man and a woman right?
 
WODIN said:
It's a legal issue because the Right made it one. You remember those state ballot initiatives from the Presidential Election that banned Gay Marriage or made marriage a union of only a man and a woman right?

It was those initiatives that brought out the voters. Once the anti-homo crowd was in the voting booth they hit the lever for Bush..... just cause they were there. If Rove and crew (hell the dems and the homo rights groups are at fault too) never got those initiatives on the ballot then Bush would have lost.

Clever I tell you....... I hate it but clever none-the-less.
 
WODIN said:
It's a legal issue because the Right made it one. You remember those state ballot initiatives from the Presidential Election that banned Gay Marriage or made marriage a union of only a man and a woman right?

Yeah, I sure do, as hengst said they were effective, though they represent how shitty US politics are....this is how the most powerful man on Earth is selected?

The thing is, civil unions are OK almost everywhere and Bush supports them. Marriage is a civil union too - people do it in churches sometimes, but they still file paperwork with the state.

Marriage already has a definiton, and it invovles a man and a woman. Why try to invent a new one just for an agenda?

Just call it a civil union and be happy with that.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:
Yeah, I sure do, as hengst said they were effective, though they represent how shitty US politics are....this is how the most powerful man on Earth is selected?

The thing is, civil unions are OK almost everywhere and Bush supports them. Marriage is a civil union too - people do it in churches sometimes, but they still file paperwork with the state.

Marriage already has a definiton, and it invovles a man and a woman. Why try to invent a new one just for an agenda?

Just call it a civil union and be happy with that.
Oh I agree I just love it when this stuff blows up and a judge who will now be labeled an activist is using a conservative interpretation of the constitution. Great stuff.
 
I dont even understand the dogma behind Christians attacking gay marriage... they claim its a religous institution but if we said well if its religious and not civil then you are no longer afforded ANY benefits from marriage like tax and insurance breaks.. Id bet they would change their tune REAL fucking fast.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:
Just call it a civil union and be happy with that.

Agreed.

Call it a Civil Union -- give it the same rights and responsibilities for a normal marraige -- and everyone is happy.

Call it a "Gay Marraige Certificate" if they don't care about the legal rights, but just want a victory of having the "m" word in there. Whatever.

Have your damn certificate and go be unhappy and miserable and stuck in divorce court fighting over kids and alimony like the rest of straight america.

Hope you're happy now.
 
Razorguns said:
Agreed.

Call it a Civil Union -- give it the same rights and responsibilities for a normal marraige -- and everyone is happy.

Call it a "Gay Marraige Certificate" if they don't care about the legal rights, but just want a victory of having the "m" word in there. Whatever.

Have your damn certificate and go be unhappy and miserable and stuck in divorce court fighting over kids and alimony like the rest of straight america.

Hope you're happy now.
LMFAO!!!
 
Top Bottom