Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
Hi,
there is nothing wrong with injecting 500 mg Testo-E once a week. We all did this years ago with good results.
But it needs time until your Testo-E level has cummulated to an efficient level (sometimes 4 weeks)
So some stacked shorter esters at the beginning (like Testo-P).
Then we realized, that the shorter esters a not necessary. Its better to do a front-load and save the shorter esters for the end of the cycle. We calculated the level/injection frequency depending on half time with the roid calculators.
Now we realized that the mathematical aproach is a good guidline, but
Its not enough to look at one curve of the blood concentration after one Testo-E injection and add the next injection, then the next (no injecting on the half of the half-time ...).
The body simply reacts differnt, when you inject Testo-E during the break down of the cummlulated exogen Testo-E.
There is only one solution for this problem: measuring.
This blood work was done by an expert, an highly respected Doc on the german boards (Kockie). He invented the scheme from above. Of course we all were sceptic, but a lot of people tried it with great sucess.
The thinking behind the intervalls are:
goal: constant level
so a front-load is very important. Thats a point where I disagree with you U.S. guys.
Why do a front-load only at the first day ? Look at the curve I discribed above. There is a second (lower) spike.
So injecting day 0-3-6 results in a more efficient front-load. Then injecting in 8 - 3 intervalls for a constant level. At the end of the cycle switch to faster acting AS like Testo-P.
there is nothing wrong with injecting 500 mg Testo-E once a week. We all did this years ago with good results.
But it needs time until your Testo-E level has cummulated to an efficient level (sometimes 4 weeks)
So some stacked shorter esters at the beginning (like Testo-P).
Then we realized, that the shorter esters a not necessary. Its better to do a front-load and save the shorter esters for the end of the cycle. We calculated the level/injection frequency depending on half time with the roid calculators.
Now we realized that the mathematical aproach is a good guidline, but
Its not enough to look at one curve of the blood concentration after one Testo-E injection and add the next injection, then the next (no injecting on the half of the half-time ...).
The body simply reacts differnt, when you inject Testo-E during the break down of the cummlulated exogen Testo-E.
There is only one solution for this problem: measuring.
This blood work was done by an expert, an highly respected Doc on the german boards (Kockie). He invented the scheme from above. Of course we all were sceptic, but a lot of people tried it with great sucess.
The thinking behind the intervalls are:
goal: constant level
so a front-load is very important. Thats a point where I disagree with you U.S. guys.
Why do a front-load only at the first day ? Look at the curve I discribed above. There is a second (lower) spike.
So injecting day 0-3-6 results in a more efficient front-load. Then injecting in 8 - 3 intervalls for a constant level. At the end of the cycle switch to faster acting AS like Testo-P.
