Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Peptide Pro
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsPeptide ProUGFREAK

Stop Michael Moore? What slimeballs

Lao Tzu

New member
http://www.moveamericaforward.org/NewsMax/

STOP MICHAEL MOORE FROM PROFITTING
IN HIS ATTACKS ON AMERICA & OUR MILITARY

“Bash America” filmmaker Michael Moore is about to unleash an attack on the U.S. Military, the heroic men and women of the Armed Forces and our Commander-In-Chief via his film “Fahrenheit 9/11.”

Inexplicably, more than 1,000 theaters have indicated they will proudly broadcast what The Guardian calls an “anti-war/anti-Bush” film – beginning June 25th. And the number keeps growing each day. The goal of the film is abundantly clear: to undermine the war on terrorism.

Moore has said the following about the film:

“Half the movie is about Iraq – we were able to get film crews embedded with American troops without them knowing it was Michael Moore. They are totally f***ed.”

After it was pre-screened, one Blame American First viewer cried, “It made me wanna burn my passport.”

Apparently there are dollar signs in their eyes too.

Michael Moore and his anti-American film distributors are hoping to cash in to the tune of millions of dollars and also change U.S. politics. One British paper noted that “Moore hopes that it will bring down the U.S. government.”

So why are mainstream movie theaters involved in promoting a political advertisement that defames our military, insults our troops and attempts to undermine the public’s support for the War on Terror?

Why are movie theaters showing political propaganda that should be governed by Federal Elections Commission regulations on campaign finance?



-------------------

I wish these slimy fucks would move to some right wing country where there is no freedom to condemn the government. i would help pay for their one way tickets.

I also hate when people use the 'criticism of US policy and leadership decreases soldier morale and leads to soldier deaths' argument to stop freedom of speech. If that were true than condemning freedom of speech using false arguments justifies fascism and leads to movements like the Nazis and KKK since we are all making tenous arguments.
 
nordstrom said:
http://www.moveamericaforward.org/NewsMax/

I wish these slimy fucks would move to some right wing country where there is no freedom to condemn the government. i would help pay for their one way tickets.

I also hate when people use the 'criticism of US policy and leadership decreases soldier morale and leads to soldier deaths' argument to stop freedom of speech. If that were true than condemning freedom of speech using false arguments justifies fascism and leads to movements like the Nazis and KKK since we are all making tenous arguments.

Well said. k your way..
 
you gotta be fair. right after the movie -- show a movie from a filmmaker praises Bush and shows the "real" truth.

you can't have one without the other. otherwise it's just liberal bullshit propoganda. What's Micheal afraid of huh??
 
Nordy-Right,let's all stick together and keep this mess one-sided and keep singing Bush's swan song no matter what type of complete bullshit he feeds his people.Gee,I wonder who's behind this latest escapade?I'm not really a fan of Moore's at all(he comes off as a whiney-boy and irritates me at times)but if he's uncovering the truth on certain issues that that the corporate controlled media fails to report on,then all the power to him IMO.
 
Razorguns said:
you gotta be fair. right after the movie -- show a movie from a filmmaker praises Bush and shows the "real" truth.

you can't have one without the other. otherwise it's just liberal bullshit propoganda. What's Micheal afraid of huh??

i don't have a problem with both sides of the story. put out a pro bush story. put out an unbiased story, put out moores (the anti-bush) story. Feel free, i just don't like these people trying to stop free expression because it isn't in the best interest of their political party.
 
why don't people disclose moore's REAL intentions with these "films". Oh yeah MAKING MONEY off making unproven accusations and sensationalizations.

people are gullible and fall for anything wild and outrageous cuz they want to believe there's ALL THESE CONSPIRACIES around them are true. Like life is this one big hollywood story.
 
Razorguns said:
why don't people disclose moore's REAL intentions with these "films". Oh yeah MAKING MONEY off making unproven accusations and sensationalizations.

people are gullible and fall for anything wild and outrageous cuz they want to believe there's ALL THESE CONSPIRACIES around them are true. Like life is this one big hollywood story.

well feel free to point out his flaws. But they are trying to shut him down, which is different. if you silence a liar he will have more followers than if you just disprove everything he says.
 
nordstrom said:
i don't have a problem with both sides of the story. put out a pro bush story. put out an unbiased story, put out moores (the anti-bush) story. Feel free, i just don't like these people trying to stop free expression because it isn't in the best interest of their political party.

I think it is okay he can broadcast whatever message he likes


HOWEVER - if he is broadcasting broad-faced lies or "creatively editing" stuff in order to make it intentionally misleading (as it is rumored he is doing and has done in the past)... I think he should be held criminally or financially responsible (fyi I think all media should be held responsible for the integrity of the information they pass on as well)
 
Becoming said:
I think it is okay he can broadcast whatever message he likes

HOWEVER - if he is broadcasting broad-faced lies or "creatively editing" stuff in order to make it intentionally misleading (as it is rumored he is doing and has done in the past)... I think he should be held criminally or financially responsible (fyi I think all media should be held responsible for the integrity of the information they pass on as well)

Yeah he does do that. I remember a good article about his bowling for columbine article that showed his fancy editing skills.

I do not think this justifies shutting him down. Some kind of mandatory warning like 'you are watching a movie made by someone with an agenda' would be nice, but they should put that on all books and movies that are like that.
 
BTW is his goal really to bring truth and justice, or is it to make a buck?

if it was such an important message - why not distribute it for free or for donations?
 
Top Bottom