Lee said:
No I'm not even considering juicing, I just like to learn. I was wondering if taking steroids around the ages of 15 to 18 would have more of a muscle-building effect then someone over the age of 20. I was thinking about it, and teenagers bodies do repair and grow faster then that of older folks, so I thought it made sense that steroids would make teens grow faster then adults.
Hmm...no, not necessarily.
When you're juicing for almost any amount of time, your natural test levels decline sharply. That's why guys who don't do clomid after cycles wind up losing everything they put on (and oftentimes even more...they trade a couple of months of being big for several months of being smaller and softer than they were
before the cycle).
If a young teen was to juice, his own test production can't always simply be added to the "boost" he's getting with steroids--say, like 1+1. His own production will slow to .5, .25, and so on, until eventually he's left with something like 0+1 near the end of a cycle (depending on its length). The steroids become his only real source of test.
And as I said, when he comes off, he'd better have plenty of clomid; until his own test is back in full swing, he'll be going from one whole point of hormones to much less. If he does everything right he'll come out a little bit ahead, but I doubt most kids
would do everything as they should.
In the end, it'd be better for the kid to just take advantage of his crazy natural test. I imagine if you got a kid on a number of short, intelligently-planned cycles, he could do real well, but it ain't worth it. Besides, it's far more fun to wait until you're really about to tap out naturally
then introduce the chemical assistance
