Sourcing

[corvettedudeman]

The remailer busted thread brings me to something i want to point out about sourcing. Over the past years and especially the past few months i have been doing alot of research of steroid caselaw.

Anyways, Passing on the name or information about someone who distributes scheduled substances falls under "distribution" itself. Meaning under law it is just as bad to source as it is to actually distribute.

I'm bringing this up so everyone is extra careful with who they source to and what kind of records they keep.

 

[granby140]

bump so more ppl can see it

 

[slobberknocker]

I don't think they'd actually bust you for that though.

 

[02gixxersix]

yea but definitely something to think about.

 

[02gixxersix]

yea but definitely something to think about.

 

[INNOCENT]

bump

 

[microstar02]

Honestly, You could not get in 1 bit of legal trouble for that.
Maybe some trouble with the source or person you gave info to, but no legal penalties could subside.

 

[corvettedudeman]

yes legal penalties, not sure exactly how it works but something along the lines of conspiracy

 

[SofaGeorge]

Honestly, You could not get in 1 bit of legal trouble for that.
Maybe some trouble with the source or person you gave info to, but no legal penalties could subside.

You're are dead wrong... the Feds can, will, and have prosecuted for providing the source info.

 

[slobberknocker]

This country is really starting to suck. Hmm, I hear Mexico's nice this time of year.

 

[Juice Authority]

You're are dead wrong... the Feds can, will, and have prosecuted for providing the source info.

You learn something new everyday. Basically you're saying by pointing a Bro in the right direction you're just as guilty as if you made the sale yourself? That just doesn't sound right but if it's the case then I'll definitely think twice before I help someone out.

 

[Juice Authority]

Bump for more input on this.

 

[Lestat]

Can you get busted for providing a source? Yes.

Will you get in any trouble at all whatsoever for it? No.

Why? Because they will make you disclose the source and any other info you know.

 

[DeepZenPill]

One more reason to keep source info scarce!

 

[SofaGeorge]

You learn something new everyday. Basically you're saying by pointing a Bro in the right direction you're just as guilty as if you made the sale yourself? That just doesn't sound right but if it's the case then I'll definitely think twice before I help someone out.

It gets even more rediculous. All you have to do is pick up the telephone or use a computer to supply the info... and you have a new charge.

Since most people here supply source info via PM or email... they can count on at least one enhancement.

What people don't understand about the process is that it is often selective. They will prosecute some people if they want to make a point in the media. (This is like when the chainsaw juggler on Venice Beach got hit by the IRS for not declaring his tips. The IRS didn't give jack diddly about the money... they just wanted the story in the paper because they knew the media value would scare the shit out of people and get them to pay their taxes.) Secondarily, they come after you if they have a reason to nail you (real or imagined) or they want to put great preassure on you to get you to rat out your source(s).

One famous pro introduced two guys. He did not participate in a sale... he just provided the introduction. He served three years for it.

 

[Juice Authority]

Sofa,

Do me a favor...can you chime in on the thread I started of at Fitness Geared. Some people seem to think I'm full of shit since I don't have case law or statutes that support this claim.

http://www.fitnessgeared.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=85343#post85343