Should we allow discussion of UG's if they are their own rep?

[wetback]

So what if someone wanted to know the quality of a UG and wasn't allowed to ask then decided what the hell lets give em try and they end up shooting up some garbage and getting an abcess or worse. I think that there is a line between posting a source(ie webnsite or email addy) and asking about quality of a product. And the source has their website or email addy has the souce's lab name in it then they are the ones lacking intelligence.

Thats what PRIVATE boards are for......oh wait........should I have said that............

 

[powderguy]

I agree, it looks like most people are in favor of posting the names of their sources on a federally watched board. Part of me is sad that most of you are that stupid and care about your source that little. But...the retards have spoken.

You have alot of nerve saying something like that..... It really shows your personality

Tell me, in your own words, what problems saying something like this will create??? ::: British Dragon has some top notch products... always worked well for me!

Now, your turn, what problems would this create? Yes, I am talking to you used2juice....... You are so sure of yourself that you will call people that you have never even met 'retards', so lets hear it

 

[powderguy]

I agree, it looks like most people are in favor of posting the names of their sources on a federally watched board. Part of me is sad that most of you are that stupid and care about your source that little. But...the retards have spoken.

Oh, wait a minute..... I just realized that YOU are the one that started this thread! LOL! So, if you are posting it to see what the concensus is, why would you insult people by saying the things you did? Are you in bed with someone? And now someone is cutting into your business? LMAO!

 

[wetback]

You have alot of nerve saying something like that..... It really shows your personality

Tell me, in your own words, what problems saying something like this will create??? ::: British Dragon has some top notch products... always worked well for me!

Now, your turn, what problems would this create? Yes, I am talking to you used2juice....... You are so sure of yourself that you will call people that you have never even met 'retards', so lets hear it

If I can comment...........IF you respect your source and are looking out for his interest I feel there is no need to broadcast his name onto a board that is KNOWN to be watched by the feds. Also why bring undo publicity to a source that you obviously are happy with, do you really think he needs YOU to promote his products ?????

I think not.

 

[Mr.X]

Tell me, in your own words, what problems saying something like this will create??? ::: British Dragon has some top notch products... always worked well for me!

Did you read the title of this thread?

"Should we allow discussion of UG's if they are their own rep?"

BD doesn't sell AS directly to people, they are NOT a source or their own rep.

What we are talking about here is (example) John's-UnderGround Lab, where John IS the lab and IS the distrubutor. The lab is not just a lab but also it's own distrubutor. Basically, ABC Lab, is just the source ABC with the word "LAB" in the end to make them look different.

It looks like the "YES" won, so there's everyone's answer - democracy in action.

 

[powderguy]

Did you read the title of this thread?

"Should we allow discussion of UG's if they are their own rep?"

BD doesn't sell AS directly to people, they are NOT a source or their own rep.

What we are talking about here is (example) John's-UnderGround Lab, where John IS the lab and IS the distrubutor. The lab is not just a lab but also it's own distrubutor. Basically, ABC Lab, is just the source ABC with the word "LAB" in the end to make them look different.

It looks like the "YES" won, so there's everyone's answer - democracy in action.

Yes, I did read the thread name, and I made a poor example.... My appologies. However, who is to say that 'xyz' lab IS the source also? As long as things like 'he has been good to me' or 'xyz labs have some good products, but HE is a dick head' are not said, no one will know if the lab is the source.... IMO things like that should NOT be on any board at all. Only feedback on the quality, and MAYBE some feedback on prices (IE xyz lab is a little high priced for my taste) of the products should be posted...

Yes, Democracy is a beautiful thing..... Most of the time

 

[wetback]

Yes, Democracy is a beautiful thing.....

AGREED........but so is the Patriot Act ! ! !

 

[Mr.X]

Yes, I did read the thread name, and I made a poor example.... My appologies. However, who is to say that 'xyz' lab IS the source also? As long as things like 'he has been good to me' or 'xyz labs have some good products, but HE is a dick head' are not said, no one will know if the lab is the source.... IMO things like that should NOT be on any board at all. Only feedback on the quality, and MAYBE some feedback on prices (IE xyz lab is a little high priced for my taste) of the products should be posted...

Yes, Democracy is a beautiful thing..... Most of the time

I stick to the wishes of the member majority, even when I don't agree....

but to give you a clear answer, IMO talking about labs who is the source (their own distributor) is just like asking about a source in the open, no different. This is not an open source board, and it is watched by LE. Some members might not understand this, but when talking about this SOURCE who is the lab, I can almost guarantee that an LE guy will get a hold of the Source's email via one of the members posting in the thread, contact them, make a buy and set them up. Eventually, all the people talking in the open about how great ABC Lab is, are in deep shit because their source (aka ABC Lab) was busted, because they couldn't keep their mouth shut. Source talks, gives up all the customer's information, and guess what? now the same big mouth customers who were posting here are now on the government radar.

I'm not saying this happens or it doesn't, but it's something that's just common sense. If I got a penny for everytime on EF I thought to myself, "where's the common sense when posting this?", I'd be a very rich man.

 

[BigAndy69]

How about not allowing open sources/"lab" posts? If they are sold openly on other sites, they can't be posted here? Seems like those are the one man UG operations.

 

[Mr.X]

How about not allowing open sources/"lab" posts? If they are sold openly on other sites, they can't be posted here? Seems like those are the one man UG operations.

That's a good start. Steroid sources are steroid sources, even if the word Lab is after them. But right now the majority voted the other way, so we have to follow their wishes.