Short Cycle Question for Huck

[Moe]

Huck--

Sorry to make a thread out of this, but, as usual, your expert knowledge has filled your pm box...

In a thread a while back we were discussing the pros/cons of running short cycles versus the conventional 8-10 week shots. Were you speaking from the basis of theory or experience (or both)?

I was thinking of going with the prop/d-bol 2 on 4 off for a full calendar year, while running Arimedex throughout (as per your recommendation). Have you done this (similar) in the past. If so I would be curious to hear about the specifics of your experience.

thanks,

MOE

 

[nautica]

Why not 2 on 3 off. 3 should give you plenty of time to recover.

nautica.

 

[Moe]

the difference is negligible I suppose...though I would get two extra runs with a 2 on 3 off schedule.

Its something to consider.

 

[nautica]

the difference is negligible I suppose...though I would get two extra runs with a 2 on 3 off schedule.

Its something to consider.

That is my point exactly. Your body can return to normal in 3 weeks. and in a 4 week layoff you are more apt to loose your gains.

Good luck.

Nautica