Serono Serostim or Eli Lilly Humatrope?

[SAF]

I can get 6mg (126IU) Serostim kits for $450. I can also get 5mg Eli Lilly kits for $300, although I'm not sure, and neither is my friend, of the total IU content of the Lilly kits. Does anyone know and which do you think is better? Serono or Lilly?

thanks,

SAF

 

[XXXL]

sero is the best way to go IMO

 

[nautica]

I believe Humatrope is actually the best, but serotosim will work well for about 1/3 of the price.

Nautica

 

[SAF]

hey saf I read your other post and it looks like your going to compete in june? are you going to run gh? what does your cycle look like?

This is my bulking cycle, which will probably continue until the end of March.

750mg Sustanon/week
400mg Deca/week

I'd like to throw in some GH, just for the hell of it, but I'm not sure if I should get either Serostim or Lilly.

SAF

 

[jc21]

are u sure u are getting a kit or just one bottle of humatrope for that price. crazy how that humatrope costs so much. i hear it is because it works so good. go with the serostim, much cheaper and has worked good for me.

 

[scrapper]

Serostim worked great for me I got a bunch of lean muscle off of it you just cant beat it for the price!

 

[g-dogg]

I have A LOT of experience with both serano and lilly, lilly is better BY FAR--if you're looking for the most bang for the buck(which you shouldn't when you do GH)-serano is cheaper, as far as gains go, use lilly or nutropin by genentech

 

[PerfectRep]

Humatrope does not make you hold near as much water at high doses. I don't know if that is the reason it seems to work better or not?

 

[ironmaster]

The amino profile and chemical make up of the 3 brands mentioned are the same. (the amino profile has to be the same to be human) It is my opinion that the perceived differences in results has to do with the steroids used, the diet, the training, and the genetics of the individual reporting, not the brand. Remember, GH does not cause gains.........it allows a person using steroids with a high calorie intake to gain lean mass. GH alone will simply lean you out. Nor does it cause water retention....but the gear used with it may.
If I used each brand in seperate cycles, for example, and used insulin with one and not the others, my results would be strikingly different, and I might think the one was better. Or, if I used heavy test with one and simple anabolics with the other, my results would be different....and so on. I come to this conclusion after years of personal use in many different combinations.
Bottom line......get the best price per iu you can get, and you will be happy with any of the 3 brands listed. Currently, Serono is the least expensive, because it is the kit of choice for HIV therapy, and is readily available.

 

[SAF]

are u sure u are getting a kit or just one bottle of humatrope for that price. crazy how that humatrope costs so much. i hear it is because it works so good. go with the serostim, much cheaper and has worked good for me.

I just spoke to my friend and he told me that the 5mg Lilly kits consist of 2 bottles, 1 powder filled and the other liquid. I'm curious as to how this compares to the 6mg Serono kits in terms of duration of use. I've used the 6mg Serono kits before and they last about 1 month on average. Would the 5mg Lilly kit last as long, or less? And is $300 too much or too little for the 5mg Lilly kit?

SAF

 

[g-dogg]

Hey SAF, go to my profile and send me an e-mail

 

[jc21]

I just spoke to my friend and he told me that the 5mg Lilly kits consist of 2 bottles, 1 powder filled and the other liquid. I'm curious as to how this compares to the 6mg Serono kits in terms of duration of use. I've used the 6mg Serono kits before and they last about 1 month on average. Would the 5mg Lilly kit last as long, or less? And is $300 too much or too little for the 5mg Lilly kit?

that is what i thought! actually they dont compare at all. the 2 bottles of humatrope will give you 15iu's of growth, while the kit of serostim will give you 126iu's of growth. now obviouly you can see which one is better.

remember 1mg of growth equals 3iu's

 

[M.O.D]

The amino profile and chemical make up of the 3 brands mentioned are the same. (the amino profile has to be the same to be human) It is my opinion that the perceived differences in results has to do with the steroids used, the diet, the training, and the genetics of the individual reporting, not the brand. Remember, GH does not cause gains.........it allows a person using steroids with a high calorie intake to gain lean mass. GH alone will simply lean you out. Nor does it cause water retention....but the gear used with it may.
If I used each brand in seperate cycles, for example, and used insulin with one and not the others, my results would be strikingly different, and I might think the one was better. Or, if I used heavy test with one and simple anabolics with the other, my results would be different....and so on. I come to this conclusion after years of personal use in many different combinations.
Bottom line......get the best price per iu you can get, and you will be happy with any of the 3 brands listed. Currently, Serono is the least expensive, because it is the kit of choice for HIV therapy, and is readily available.

masters advise is worth its weight in serostim

 

[SAF]

that is what i thought! actually they dont compare at all. the 2 bottles of humatrope will give you 15iu's of growth, while the kit of serostim will give you 126iu's of growth. now obviouly you can see which one is better.

remember 1mg of growth equals 3iu's

That certainly says it all! thanks

SAF