ur sig is too long as admin i say get rid of itperkele said:No one wants shit like this to Movie forum.
Wootoom said:ur sig is too long as admin i say get rid of it
LOl she hasnt even seen itperkele said:
sweet thanks broass_face said:I thought Saw 1 was better. But this movie is not bad. The only issue I had with it was the weak way they reveal the twist at the end. I believe a better director and a better writer could have revealed the plot twist in a manner that does not require a montage. All in all, entertaining.
silverbackn said:I wathced it two nights ago. It's pretty good. Good twist as was the end of the first movie. Saw is playing people like a piano. There were too many characters who weren't developed with any depth. I also didn't like the way that the muscular guy was portrayed (us big folk can't catch a break in how we are viewed).

It hurts! I knew the second I saw him he was gonna be Craig Titus all over againass_face said:Yeah, prototypical muscle head stereotype. Very sad. When are they going to learn we have feelings too.
![]()
ass_face said:I thought Saw 1 was better. But this movie is not bad. The only issue I had with it was the weak way they reveal the twist at the end. I believe a better director and a better writer could have revealed the plot twist in a manner that does not require a montage. All in all, entertaining.
They guy in the first one that was cheating on his wife was easily the worst overactor I have ever seen. Absolutely horrible.hanselthecaretaker said:They didn't even need a montage. That kinda ruined the points that could've made good suspense for the 3rd one. Anyways Saw 2 was marginally better, not nearly as cheesy as the first one got towards the end.
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










