sachets vs vials

[motiondo]

Are sachets trust-worthy ( or even more so) due to the way in which they are sealed...vs. vials - which are more easily manipulative - by anyone -
The packaging looks suspecious on sachets....however, not any body or process can seal these...and the dates and product description are laser printed on the back of most...(e.g. TE3...2008.10.6...)

 

[GUARDIAN]

I prefer vials, amps, and then sachets in that order. Too many things go wrong, imo, with satchets. Once you do a few they are not bad.

I know exactly what u r referring to about the suspicious packaging. You can verify those batch numbers. But that will tell you nothing about sterility.

They just suck to use but are great for shipping purposes.

 

[motiondo]

Thanks 8and20 - yeah, the reliability of sterility was a great concern....I'll use the couple I have this go round...and will defer to the Vails and amps hince forth...I only have 4x3ML sachets of Sus_250 each, so they're only going to be used through half of my 12 week cycle...and I have 2 -10Ml vials on hand for the second half of this cycle.....

 

[levi8599]

the satchets are supposedly heat sealed not sealed with glue to keep them sterile. great for shipping but give me vials anyday.

 

[hurricane]

dont like sachets .. to much of a pain in the azz.. vials any day

 

[airsmith2k]

satchets SUCK i dont even think they are dosed rite

 

[bluejay]

Of course everyone is going to prefer vials because they are less work... But come on.... It only takes about 10 minutes to safely & effectively draw the contents from a sachet into a sterile vial. It's not brain surgery!!

That being said I am lazy and if I had a choice I prefer vials too.

 

[jumpmaster82]

i hate sachets, but when i get them cheap and know its really good gear ill go with em.

 

[bluejay]

i hate sachets, but when i get them cheap and know its really good gear ill go with em.

Yea exactly what I was trying to say...

 

[billdance]

Sure wish I would have received mine so I could try.... sucks...