Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES UGL OZ
Raptor Labs UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIES UGL OZUGFREAKRaptor LabsOxygenPharm

Russell Crowe Cast as Superman!!!

crowesupermanposter2.jpg



my April fool's joke 4 days late.
 
Kevin Spacey as Lex Luthor?? hahahah... he'd do better as Jimmy Olsen. =)

-Warik
 
dgreenhill said:
I read that Crowe is being groomed as the next James Bond.

Ah man, I think Pierce Brosman is doing a fine job why swith now? As a sidenote I just saw a picture Roger Moore(he and Sean Connery were the best bond's) man he is 75 now. Can you believe that?
 
curling said:


Ah man, I think Pierce Brosman is doing a fine job why swith now? As a sidenote I just saw a picture Roger Moore(he and Sean Connery were the best bond's) man he is 75 now. Can you believe that?

they change every 3-4 movies

i dont like the guy that much, so i wouldnt liek to see crowe get it
 
I know that's just a joke, but somehow it scares me that it might happen.

Better him than Nicholas Cage, I suppose.
 
damnit....that scared the Hades out of me. They need to cast someone who is 6'3 around 225-230 ripped to play Kal El.
 
I wouldn't say they change Bonds every 3-4 movies since Connery and Moore both did more than 4 Bond movies a piece. Timothy Dalton got the hook because he sucked and Pierce Bronsnan who was the orignal choice wasn't available.
 
Last edited:
The Whole F/N Show said:
I wouldn't say they change Bonds every 3-4 movies since Connery and Moore both did more than 4 Bond movies a piece. Timothy Dalton got the hook because he sucked and Pierce Bronsnan who was the orignal choice wasn't available.

thats the policy now though, its what brosnan keeps saying, this last movie is his last whether he wants to keep going or not.

they started the policy with dalton, i think as a result of lazenby only doing one
 
Really? I didn't no that. Timothy did suck as Bond, which for me is kinda said since my real name is Dalton. Now I think Russell Crowe is a bad ass he seems a little too Buff to play Bond. Maybe that's just me.
 
The Whole F/N Show said:
Really? I didn't no that. Timothy did suck as Bond, which for me is kinda said since my real name is Dalton. Now I think Russell Crowe is a bad ass he seems a little too Buff to play Bond. Maybe that's just me.

yeah, i think he;s a little to brazen. thats why i think he's unsuitable

bond was always ment to be a brazen thug but in a sheep in wolves clothing way:)
 
furious said:
damnit....that scared the Hades out of me. They need to cast someone who is 6'3 around 225-230 ripped to play Kal El.

I agree, with very dark hair too. Jolie would make a good Lois though.
 
Am I THE ONLY ONE who ever notices that HYUGE "thing" on Crowe's forehead? I mean, I think that gladiator was an excellent flick and Crowe was a great in it, but SHEESH! All the freaking money that guy makes and he can't get that "thing" removed? I found it to be VERY distracting and took away from my overall enjoyment of the movie-watching experience.

PS - I disagree with Jolie being cast as Lois Lane. She is just way to "slutty-looking" (not a cheap shot at Jolie) and would be miscast. Someone more like Teri Hatcher (UGH! What happened to her?!) would be better suited I feel.
 
danielson said:


thats the policy now though, its what brosnan keeps saying, this last movie is his last whether he wants to keep going or not.

they started the policy with dalton, i think as a result of lazenby only doing one

Untrue. Brosnan is signed on for two more, that'll make five for him. He may do more, but age could catch up with him since he started the role later in life. Dalton was yanked because no one liked him as Bond and no one went to see his movies. There is no "limit" to the number of Bond pictures an actor can do if he's popular and young enough.
 
I still think they should go with christopher reeves. that would be great. every feel good liberal out there would be like "wow, what a good movie...it gives disabled children so much hope...i havent even seen the movie yet, but it deserves an oscar...what a great idea...sheer brilliance."
 
bikinimom said:
Am I THE ONLY ONE who ever notices that HYUGE "thing" on Crowe's forehead? I mean, I think that gladiator was an excellent flick and Crowe was a great in it, but SHEESH! All the freaking money that guy makes and he can't get that "thing" removed? I found it to be VERY distracting and took away from my overall enjoyment of the movie-watching experience.

PS - I disagree with Jolie being cast as Lois Lane. She is just way to "slutty-looking" (not a cheap shot at Jolie) and would be miscast. Someone more like Teri Hatcher (UGH! What happened to her?!) would be better suited I feel.

Teri Hatcher became anorexic and started doing radio shack commercials? And what thing on Crowe's forehead. Now I had noticed that big knot Van Damme is sporting.
 
The Dude said:


Untrue. Brosnan is signed on for two more, that'll make five for him. He may do more, but age could catch up with him since he started the role later in life. Dalton was yanked because no one liked him as Bond and no one went to see his movies. There is no "limit" to the number of Bond pictures an actor can do if he's popular and young enough.

I liked Timothy Dalton even though his Bond was pretty hard. But that was one 007 no-one would mess with, I could easily see his character killing the bad guys without a care.

It's amazing how one great role can set up someone (like Christopher Reeve) for life.
 
Island Son said:


I liked Timothy Dalton even though his Bond was pretty hard. But that was one 007 no-one would mess with, I could easily see his character killing the bad guys without a care.

It's amazing how one great role can set up someone (like Christopher Reeve) for life.

apparently thats how bond was originally intended to be played, like dalton.

its just unlucky for him as he did his ones in the 80's :D

i HATED lazenby's one, some people think its the best but i cant sit through the thing. i was under the impression there was a 4 max rule as brosnan mentions it everytime he;s on one of our more famous chat shows, but i hope they keep him, he's REALLY good
 
I think Brosnan is doing a good job as Bond but Connery will always be the best Bond in my opinion.
--------------------------------

"Names Ash.....Housewares"
 
I am enjoying Brosnan's Bond. I see no reason for them to change for maybe another 10 years. When Connery and Moore quit during Bond they were both looking kinda old. And who remembers Never Say Never Again when Connery came back? I was young when it came out but thought it was kinda weird to see him playing Bond once again.
 
Top Bottom