Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
.jpg "Research Chemical Sciences")
.png "Research Chemical Sciences")
My situation is this:
I'm a big guy with good muscle mass, but i don't really want any more. (6'3" 265)However, i want to maintain and keep the strength that i have. The problem is i have about 25-30 pounds to lose (damn gut!). Right now i am doing ok, my weight is dropping slowly.
I've got my diet down, and my cardio routine is pretty set at 4 days a week in the gym, and on sunday i ride my mountain bike up a hill, which kicks my ASS.
So, i don't want to do any 'bulking'.
I was thinking of for 3-4 weeks, cut only, follow by 2 weeks of strength training with elevated calorie intake. In 2 weeks i should be able to hit each major muscle groups 3 times with recovery.
Is this a decent plan? Or should i just keep at the lifting at a regular pace. I really want to lower my overall weight for skeletal reasons, my lower back could use some reduced load. I am thinking my desired calorie deficite can't support the weight lifting that well.
I'm a big guy with good muscle mass, but i don't really want any more. (6'3" 265)However, i want to maintain and keep the strength that i have. The problem is i have about 25-30 pounds to lose (damn gut!). Right now i am doing ok, my weight is dropping slowly.
I've got my diet down, and my cardio routine is pretty set at 4 days a week in the gym, and on sunday i ride my mountain bike up a hill, which kicks my ASS.
So, i don't want to do any 'bulking'.
I was thinking of for 3-4 weeks, cut only, follow by 2 weeks of strength training with elevated calorie intake. In 2 weeks i should be able to hit each major muscle groups 3 times with recovery.
Is this a decent plan? Or should i just keep at the lifting at a regular pace. I really want to lower my overall weight for skeletal reasons, my lower back could use some reduced load. I am thinking my desired calorie deficite can't support the weight lifting that well.
