liftingfreak1983 said:
ya i guess the point of DC's workout is being still fatigued while doing your working set. What if I was lifting low volume at high intensity, then would I take more time between sets?
You'll wanna hit me, but I'm still confused, LOL. Maybe I should just describe whwhat I think and do.
In a very low volume routine like DC, I consider the work set--including rest-pauses, statics, or drop sets--only one set.
For example, in my last workout, I did this. Keep in mind I'm still getting over being sick, explaining the weak weight:
Hammer Incline Press--1,375 for 10, 15 deep breaths, then 3 more.
That's it. Then I did pec stretches with a couple of Buicks before moving on to back. Next week I hope to get back to the stretching with the Hummers.
Seriously though, I see that as "one long set." You
could call it two sets, but the rest interval is quite short, and obviously I can't do a third as many reps. I like to think of them as forced reps done without a training partner.
Anyway, after I do the pec stretch, I wait as long as needed to feel good before doing the next exercise. Usually within 5 minutes I'm fresh and ready to start warm-ups for my rows, chins or whatever.
I see no advantage to rushing from incline press to rows, then running from rows to the next thing, and so on...that'd get you out of breath, but not much else to my knowledge.
The same holds true for any low volume, high-intensity routine. If you're rest-pausing, doing drop sets or whatever, lots of rest between those and the
initial "set" of reps to failure defeats the purpose of those things.
On the other hand, if you're trying to do two sets (or more) of ONE exercise at a certain level--say, you want to do 2 sets of 8 on the bench with more than XXX lbs.--then yes, it
would benefit you to rest between those sets. I wouldn't wait around for 10 minutes, but 3-5 is certainly fine in my book.
I hope that helps.