Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below Okay I saw this movie last night and it was fantastic. I was dissapointed however in "the dragons'" physique... All this, he's a body-builder, strong, ya di da and he's got his shirt off looking like joe shmoe. Bottom line, he should have done a 10 week cycle, (I know he must be a new juicer), 500mg sustanon, 25mg dbol, 400mg Equipoise. Maybe even some winstrol on top to tighten up that back. I will kick the dragons ass. He was repping out 205 like it was impossible. Puss...
Red Dragon
- Thread starter deify
- Start date
AnabolicusEroticus
New member
Ralph Fiennes performance was very good and beleivable, but I too was snickering under my breath when he was referred to as possibly being a bodybuilder. When Edward Norton described him as such, all I thought was that Norton had a much better physique in American History X than Fiennes ever attained in Dragon. Fiennes had spaghetti arms and a little paunch. And no, he's not new to the sauce... he never did a cycle period. If you actually think he did even one cycle, then that's fucking hilarious.
The Almighty
New member
Its a movie people, and considering more than 1/3 of Americans are overweight slobs, benching 205 for reps would impress the average moviegoer.
Similar threads
