Reasons why every inmate serving life without parole should be exeuted

[Immortal Juicer]

I think it benefits all inmates, guilty or not.

A life sentence without parole is death sentence. Its just a matter of time and until then you get to be raped, dehumanized attacked and if you are lucky murdered.

If by some god awful chance an innocent man is convicted of life without the possibility of parole it would me sadistic to make him live in that enviornment for the rest of his life.

If somene murders another person, they deserve to die. And they should be executed as soon as possible. They should not be allowed to hurt society more by having tax payers pay to keep their worthless ass in prison for 50+ years.

If some innocent guys gets stuck with a life, at least give him the humane option of ending his life painfully.

There is no law for the world. All laws are made up by a society. When try to apply these intangible laws in reality, we end up with a big fucking disaster.

And the longer we force ourselves to believe they exist, the more fucked up it gets and more people suffer.

I cannot think of any more of a cruel and unusual punishment than imprisoning an innocent man to a place where he is tortured every day and Knows that this is the rest of his life until the day he dies and gets put out of his misery.

 

[huntmaster]

IMO---in cases such as Yates recently, where the individual commited the crime and there is no doubt that they did it---they should get the death penalty and they should get it quick--within the week.

 

[dimitrios]

IMO---in cases such as Yates recently, where the individual commited the crime and there is no doubt that they did it---they should get the death penalty and they should get it quick--within the week.

With-in a week?? They should have taken the bitch out the back door to the swimming pool and let her take it like she gave it to her poor kids. That bitch and her f*cked up husband both need to die, now he will end up killing someone and blame it on the stress of the his wifes trial.

 

[Julez]

I am pro death penalty, in fact one thing that I am with some Ismlamic countrys is that I think that the killer should be killed with the same method they used.

But, I think that if we use the death penalty, it MUST MUST MUST be beyond doubt that the perpetrator commited the crime(as in the Oaklahmoma bombings).

Intresting point you make. Here we have a famous murderer(moors murderer) called Ian Brady. Him and his accomplice tortured and killed children in the 60's. He got sentenced to life(we got rid of the death penalty in '65). A few years back he took the government to court as he wanted to die(could'nt take prison for the reasons you describe).

In the end he was being fed through a tube in a secure hospital at a cost of £2000 A DAY!!!!

He is still alive

I think his accomplice(Myra Hindley) has 'married' in a gay wedding and had her autobiography published. (She is also a lifer). Oh and she has been launching a media campaign asking for her freedom as she was 'only' 18 when she commited the crimes