Q & A for laws

[Code]

Just wondering why congress doesn't do the same thing we do in the technology industry.

Test laws before they publish them.

Wouldn't be that hard, just run each law through a templated system of quick-n-dirty trial tests.

 

[CrimsonKing]

Ya right.. You want to be the 'test panel'?

And we all know how bug free software is from the great testing they do to eliminate all flaws in the code....

 

[Code]

Hahaha! True, bugs abound in nearly all code.

But at least they'd work out some obvious loopholes.

It would be too costly I imagine to actually write sound laws

 

[Warik]

Hey now... as a programmer I can vouch for "blame the user." Many bugs found in well-written programs after the first release are usually attributed to users doing absolutely STUPID shit. It's kind of like saying: "seat belts suck... if you hit a tree at 100mph the seat belt isn't going to do shit." Well damn... you'd have to be a pretty stupid fucker to drive into a tree at 100mph. The belt works fine... just the dumbass using it who needs to be debugged.

-Warik

 

[manny78]

They're already doing this in Canada. For example here in my province turning right side on a red light is forbidden. SO they legalized it in some cities for a year in order to see if it would have some benefits. They finally decided that it would be a good idea except for Montreal.

 

[Newbie2building]

hey we could test them out on prisoners and the handicapped.